>amd fanboys actually find ways to defend this

>>62007264
>kids will make shitty threads

File: 1497150233764.jpg (109KB, 588x647px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 588x647px

>>62007264
>$600
>for only 8 cores 16 threads

>>62007264
Ryzen is fair.
RX Vega is shit.

>>62007342
but muh single thread

defend the 7820x getting raped by the 7700k in gayming

>>62007414

>intel defending itself against itself

lol, everyone knows even AMD used 7700k in its GPU presentations

the 7820x is just to silence all the memes AMD'ers are trying to use with the x299

>that 20 minute cringy linus tech tips video walking in the rain complaining about the mobo price
>turns out TR mobos are almost 150 more for the cheapest price
>and now overpriced cpu by 50% from an i7

>>62007471
This mad that intel released an inferior product.

File: 0820171657a-1.jpg (1MB, 1725x2898px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1725x2898px

Do not fall for this meme

>>62007558
Good thing it's been fixed on Epyc and Threadripper.

File: IMG_0699.jpg (67KB, 600x885px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 600x885px

>>62007264
Lets be honest, if it wasn't for amd, these motherfucker Jews would still be charging 1k for the 5960x. In fact the price of that bitch dropped right after ryzens release. 3 years marked as 1k!! 3 years!!

>>62007599
Yea I should've shelled out $1000+ to have a functioning cpu

>>62007558
GENTOOMANS BTFO

>>62007609

the i7's have never went up in price

its always been 100, 200, 300

and the i5-6700k at just $220 in terms of just gaming is still the best price to performance

>>62007558
I see you're still mad

File: 1499042031529.jpg (61KB, 1136x640px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 1136x640px

>>62007687
C-can you hold my hand

>>62007558
>xorg failed
how's that Ryzen's fault?

>>62007640
How about educating yourself instead of buying R3 garbage dies? The castaway of castaways.

>>62007783

Personally I game and do normal tasks at the same time (like everyone). I wonder which gets less of a performance hit? My 7700K would get retarded if I had a 10bit video playing on another screen, or even just a few browser windows

>>62007885

I mean simultaneously

>>62007885

so then get the new x i7, its faster in all that plus has more cores and threads

also the mobo costs $150 less than TR4's starting price

Ryzen is great, Vega is SHIT

File: doitfgt.jpg (85KB, 835x703px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 835x703px

>>62007264
>muh fox and chicken analogy

>>62007668
>and the i5-6700k at just $220 in terms of just gaming is still the best price to performance
How are there this many useless cocksucking shills flooding the board right now? Must be the upcoming Coffee Lake housefire.

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2017-ryzen-5-1600-1600x-vs-core-i5-7500k-review

>>62007471
>that 20 minute cringy linus tech tips video walking in the rain complaining about the mobo price
He was bitching about product segmentation and how stupid Kaby Lake X is, which all holds true even after release, dipshit
>turns out TR mobos are almost 150 more for the cheapest price
$120 at most.
>and now overpriced cpu by 50% from an i7
You mean those shitty 6-8 cores that aren't worth their weight in lead and have gimped PCIe lanes because fuck you we're Intel?

>>62007471
>and now overpriced cpu by 50% from an i7
But the TR is 60~70% faster in multithreaded workloads.

>>62008204

>faster in shit nobody here actually needs

File: Capture.png (308KB, 1183x655px) Image search: [Google]

308KB, 1183x655px

>>62008019

nobody cares about your 1 site's 1 solitary review

also its only 212 dollars

>>62008238
>its bad because no one here needs it!
Your logic is astounding.

I'm not saying that everyone should run out and get a TR, but there is actually sense to AMD's pricing if you are in the market for a workstation CPU.

If you're just a gamer then buy a fucking i5.

>>62008256

in case you didnt figure it out, the site lists every CPU in effective speed

ryzen CPUs suck ass and arent even faster than the 7700k

those are done and out of the conversation, the TR9500x is the only one near the top

>>62008281
Yeah, but in price to performance the Ryzen CPUs are still competitive.

>>62007264
>>62008267
You keep making these threads but what do you gain? I already established that Ryzen is a better CPU for real world users what do multitasking. Not everyone is a gamer manchild that buys PC for gaming only.

File: 118.gif (68KB, 500x293px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 500x293px

>>62008238
>I don't have a use for it, therefore nobody does!

>>62008267
>Actually thinking this is even a remotely valid comparison
You are dumber than a sack of dogshit that's been dropped off a cliff. If you didn't notice, the link was 1600/1600X vs i5, retard.

>>62007558
>Using a shitty x server running on a shitty OS running on a shitty CPU
>It works like shit

Shocking

>>62007558
http://phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Ryzen-Segv-Response

>isolated to these early Ryzen processors under Linux

This is not segfaulting while compiling because Ryzen, it's just xorg crashing because it's shit. 0x0 = Null pointer.

>tfw the only reason i give a shit at all about amd is because they make intel/nvidia products cheaper for me

>>62007342
Name one commonly used program that can utilize 16 cores

>>62011567

HowToCureAutismAndGetBetterBait.exe

Might help you

>>62007558
If you're actually having segfaults you can contact AMD and they will issue an RMA. It seems to only effect some early production units so it's possibly a manufacturing defect.

>>62011567
GCC.
Excel also is multithreaded.

>>62011567
:(){ :|: & };:

>>62011567
Linux

>>62011567
Windows, The Linux kernel and pretty much any OS

>>62011567
Handbrake.

File: dfgdfgdfg.gif (83KB, 379x387px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 379x387px

>>62011622
>so it's possibly a manufacturing defect.
Which means it's shit?

I think the memes went out of control with the ryzen and now it's flaws are coming up more.

>>62011567
Adobe Premiere

>>62007264
>userbenchmarks

>>62011567
>One
You don't get it do you?
It's 2017, people don't sacrifice their PC for one task at a time. I can play games, encode video and compile shit all at the same time.
Enjoy your 1 task CPU, loser

>>62008267
>comparing 12 core to 4 core

File: new game bear scare.webm (2MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1280x720px

>>62007264
The ultimate get shit done PC of 2017 is a R7 1700 and a 1080.

>being a brand shill in 2000+17

>>62012477
This desu.
I'd ignore the radeon, but still get the Ryzen for value.

Expect the intels to come down drastically in price as they try to compete.
I love those delicious intel tears.

>>62012477

does it compute game physics faster than intel options?

>>62012663
Even if it was slightly less it would still beat intel for value for money.

>>62012372
thats more multiprocessing than multithreading

>>62012663
I'd rather have a cpu capable of playing games while I render shit in blender and premier, or streaming, instead of a cpu that will give you 20 extra fps in a couple of games.

You'll still run most shit at 120+ fps. Does it fucking matter if it's 130 or 150?

File: 9b5[1].jpg (38KB, 611x404px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 611x404px

>>62007264
Double the amount of cores but not double the performance

>>62012710
You're right, but it is still taking advantage of the additional cores to improve performance because we can scale up more cores easier than scaling up clock speed to match the multiprocessing performance.

>>62007599
No it wasn't, PEBCAK could never be fixed by hardware.

>>62007352
/thread

>>62012477
worth trading in 4790k to a r7 1700?

File: 10 cores uses more power and still loses lol.png (952KB, 1920x2160px) Image search: [Google]

952KB, 1920x2160px

>>62012714