>intel will have no response to ryzen for at least another 4 years

>>61983942
Well, AMD had no response to SB and onwards for 6 years.
CPU R&D cycles are long when you're not iterating on your previous uarch.

how about you wait 2 days and then talk?

>>61984692
>skylake v3: moar coars edition
ok

>>61984692
>14nm double plus good edition
>blowing VRM since 2018

>>61983942
Is that Poettering?

>>61984692
http://www.strawpoll.me/13728399 lul

>>61984692
>skylakelakelake
>14nm+++++++++
>no ipc improvements in sight
okay

File: 1349521585968.jpg (24KB, 320x400px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 320x400px

>>61984948
>mfw six core consumer i7s with thermal cum instead of solder
Enjoy you're 4GHz heat limit before needing to delid

>>61984692
>no IPC improvement
>95W TDP is a lie
>still using Jew semen under the IHS, so expect 90C temps under moderate load
I'm sure AMD is very worried

>>61984692
DOA

>>61985015
I'll deli like I usually do and be fine with my arctic chill

File: profile_large.png (51KB, 580x135px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 580x135px

http://www.anandtech.com/show/11722/intel-reveals-ice-lake-core-architecture-10nm-plus

But that's wrong

Intel Ice Lake will have 8 cores and demolish Rypoo in performance and power efficiency 10nm+ process is better than Global Floundries garbage process

Cannon Lake had 8 cores in the original design

File: kaizad-mistry-2017-manufacturing(1)_29_575px.png (103KB, 678x381px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 678x381px

>>61985188
Except that 10nm+ isn't even going to be any better than 14nm++ according to Intel's own slides.

Also
>w-wait for coffeelake
>w-wait for icelake

lol.

File: india inside.jpg (387KB, 1500x1164px) Image search: [Google]

387KB, 1500x1164px

>>61985188
>Rypoo
>poo

File: 10nm by 2015.png (123KB, 547x261px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 547x261px

>>61985188
>10nm+ process is better than Global Floundries garbage process
lol I knew it, the faggot Intel shills are starting to attack Samsung, GF and IBM as well as AMD. Intel's 10nm is a delayed disaster.

File: nm process details.png (31KB, 707x797px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 707x797px

>>61985668