How the fuck is Google allowed to censor anyone who isn't

>>61966175
fuck of memeist

>>61966175
They're a private company thus can't be held to same free speech standards

>>61966198
True, but selective enforcement of the rules is complete bullshit.

>>61966198
Well I'd agree,
but they have a monopoly, so the "free market" argument goes right out the window

>>61966175
>I'm using a service for free why do I have to agree to their terms of service????!!! Fuck the jews

>>61966214
I agree completely. However, there's little anyone can do about it until the tide shifts. Anything not hard left is seen as Nazi

>>61966230
What the fuck are you on about? A single company having a monopoly *is* the result of an unregulated free market, you disgusting communist.

>>61966175
>not being a white supremacist makes you a hardcore leftist

Why are /pol/cucks so clinically retarded?

>>61966254
t. antifa

>>61966198
They literally are a global monopoly, hence they should be held to the same standards as democratic countries.

File: you are already dead.png (603KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]

603KB, 1024x1024px

>>61966175
STOP SPAMMING MY BOARD

>>61966246
literally not true

>>61966175
it's their service, they can do whatever they want with it
don't like it? don't use it.

>>61966262
Exhibit A

>>61966175
They booted Clover off of the app store too, because even though it defaulted to the main page without images, this site still hosts porn.
Google's guidelines are so inane that if anything even remotely linked to you offends them they'll boot you.

>>61966265
There are several countries that agree and have taken legal action, unfortunately the US isn't one of them..yet

File: 1491601973605.jpg (66KB, 720x707px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 720x707px

>>61966175
Tech companies are slowly setting themselves up to get their ass stretched by govt...
It's going to happen just as it did in the past :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breakup_of_the_Bell_System

Don't worry, they're literally tying rope around their necks for an upcoming series of court cases... because they are that dumb.

>>61966254
A lot of them are simply uneducated. And I don't even mean that in a strict institutional sense, by all means be homeschooled, but they're easily emotionally manipulated.

>>61966267
>not being concerned with free speech on the internet

What are you doing on /g/.

>>61966287
everything offends somebody

>>61966175
Welcome to the free market, you fascist piece of shit. They have the right to impose whatever the fuck TOS they want. Don't like it? Go somewhere else.

>>61966297
this isn't a free speech issue

>Banks start terminating the accounts of people with "bad opinions" because muh freedom.
>People with "bad opinions" suddenly lack one of the essential services for surviving in todays society.

>People in the United States would defend the rights of the banks in such an event because muh freedom.

>>61966287
The less phoneposters the better. You can only argue against this if you think low quality posts are better than high quality posts.

>>61966322
Why would a bank terminate the account of an individual bringing in money?
Oh wait, you fascists are typically poor and stupid no wonder banks don't give a fuck about you.

>>61966311
You forgot part of your sentence. What issue is it then?

File: 1498349798209.jpg (159KB, 1270x1095px) Image search: [Google]

159KB, 1270x1095px

>>61966273
You say "literally" too much, I bet it bothers others around you

>>61966335
>Immediately jumps to namecalling.
Typical.
>Why would paypal terminate an individual bringing in money.
>Why would a cloudfare terminate an individual bringing in money.

>>61966287
shouldn't firefox/chrome/etc be removed because they can be used to watch porn?

>>61966311
>some guy expressed his non-mainstream view in an organization
>gets booted immediately
how is this not about free speech?

>>61966345
the issue is that the app violated google's policies, and as it's their service, they have complete control over what those policies are
google has no legal obligation to host any app

>how to not be censored

1. don't be an asshole
2. if an asshole, get ready to be censored

File: 1391389887367.gif (343KB, 480x270px) Image search: [Google]

343KB, 480x270px

>>61966175
99.99999999% of the World didn't know shit about this. Me included.
Now thanks to Google and the Streisand effect the whole world is aware of them.
Well played Google-tards.

>>61966175

Because they can.

Should have supported the movement to end net-neutrality so that you could start your own ISP that provides services to libertarian hosting services. Probably should have supported to movement to offload ICANN to a private entity, so that they couldn't pick and choose who the feel like granting access too.

Too late now.

Anyway, Gab is fucking stupid. Make your app available through a website.

It's not rocket science.

>>61966380
how is it about free speech?

>>61966175
well thats good news, now normies have to do 3 steps installs and we all know that they dont have the brain power for that

>>61966198

Tell that to homophobic bakers.

>>61966380
you think you have a legal right to have your shit hosted by google? seriously?
think about what you're saying

>>61966397
Define asshole

File: 1497645511494.jpg (97KB, 861x1170px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 861x1170px

>/g/ was all about freedom
>then it wasn't because the same retard shows up in every single thread arguing for 100 posts with every single random poster about how censorship is excellent when it aligns with my brand of partisans
>Then proceeds to insult everyone, moving goalposts and pop random equivalences left and right

>>61966254

>Supporting Free Speech Makes You A White Supremacist

Interesting. Could you expand upon that?

>>61966381
>violated google's policies

Which ones specifically? Letting some racist have an account to post does not constitute the service to be racist or what you think violates something.

>>61966368
The difference is I guess Clover is used specifically for 4chan and nothing else. A web browser could still be used for purely family friendly things.

That seems to be Google's reasoning.

>>61966287

But that's an outright lie.

They have the tumblr app on there.

They have the reddit app on there (I guess that's borderline because reddit links to third parties)

They have snapchat on there.

So they don't really care about pornography or offensiveness.

>>61966251
No it's not. Google and most major companies are protected by towers of patents that act as gates for any new comers. Ever wonder why there are only 2 x86 manufacturers? It's because the government wanted two sources so Intel had to fairly license it to at least one company. Or try making a successful android app that uses list data structures, if you're lucky you won't get sure by patent trolls who making profit just from lawsuits and go after small guys knowing it costs millions upon millions to hire patent lawyers for years on end of appeals.

The US absolutely does not have a free market in the slightest. The patent system itself is the most heavy handed and encompassing regulation that lets larger companies to artificially raise barriers to entry, something that is normally covered by anti-trust regulation

>>61966198
/thread

Don't like the company? Don't use their services. People like OP are pants-on-head retarded

>>61966418
Homosexuality is a protected class under the law. Being a racist isn't

>>61966214
Are there hate speech apps made by leftists?
You're saying selective so I assume you have examples of this.

>>61966297

Raids by /leftypol/ and normies.

>>61966311

It's a free speech issue.

File: Garfield pipe.gif (15KB, 178x172px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 178x172px

>>61966421
>Corporations that are bigger than countries shouldn't have to conform to certain standards.

Why the fuck do people think like this?
Are you unironically retarded?

>>61966431
that's just what they said, and specifics are beside the point, what the operator of the service says they do and do not want, goes. they do not need a reason

>>61966292
I hope this happens, but these companies are very powerful and I have my doubts.

>>61966462
leftypol is like 12 NEETs overdosing on HRT.
They'll probably all commit suicide sooner or later.

File: 1398078127910.jpg (46KB, 456x461px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 456x461px

>>61966175
Meanwhile a mod just deleted our daughteru thread in this very board. Spend your energy in worthy causes instead of a fucking Android app nobody gives a shit about.

>>61966462
>It's a free speech issue.
No, it's not. Google is NOT stopping you from saying what you want. They're just stopping you from using THEIR service to do it.

>>61966322

This has actually happened, almost.

Multiple banks refused to service accounts for poeple inolved in pornogrpahy or prostitution.

Anyway, we have the Civil Rights Act and Faggot Wedding Cakes, so it's clear that people are comfortable extending the notion of free speech beyond the boundaries of government institutions.

We've seen a large debate about whether private businesses can refuse to furnish rest rooms for sexual deviants.

It's not unreasonable to ask if businesses who have monopolies based on government intervention, benefiting from a public utility, should have a more neutral political position on the services they provide.

>>61966441
Nobody wants to be associated with 4chan, by hosting a 4chan browser app Google is basically going against their far-left views.

>>61966427
Anyone I don't agree with.

>>61966365
Except DS wasn't bringing in good money at all, in fact, they were costing money due to all the DDOsing going on.
But alas, this is too much for you to understand when you get triggered by 'namecalling' on 4chan of all places.

>>61966175
Because anyone without a swastika on their forehead is a hard-core leftist, and all news is fake news until Trump tweets otherwise.
Eat shit and die.

>>61966175
>Google allowed to censor anyone who isn't a hardcore leftist?
Wrong. Google just wants hate speech gone from their app store, it's their choice.

>>61966262
Case on point

>>61966453

Right.

So we need to make being a racist a protected class.

>>61966494

Google is a company that resides on a public utility and profits from said public utility. If it wishes to engage in political persuasion, it should be removed from the public utility and create it's own private networks (which it is).

The small hitch here is that google ultimately decided to support the continued government control of the public utility it resides on.

So really, it's not THEIR service, it's OUR service.

They are finding this out the hard way in Europe right now, which is ironic, because Europeans are so very touchy about Naughty Speech.

>>61966524
Got it.

Anything not conforming to the position deemed "good" is hate speech

https://tiny.iavian.net/ij2q

>>61966175
Because they are ignoring net nuetrallity as they continue to privately lobby against it.

>>61966325
High quality post

>>61966198
/thread

>>61966429
Nice strawman.
Nobody got censored for supporting free spech, they got removed from a service Google owns for being an overt platform for literal white supremacists (e.g. daily stormers)

>>61966175
What was the app?

>>61966487
this

File: 1455971773323.gif (67KB, 230x230px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 230x230px

>>61966527
>Lol you got so triggered
Except name calling isn't an argument, of course you wouldn't understand this though.
>They were costing money.
Yea that service that was made to handle DDOS attacks sure were having a hard time handling DDOS attacks, and it SURE must have cost so much money.
Can you prove that DS were actually costing them money or are you just pulling that out of your arse?
Thought so.

>>61966535

So this is the power of /leftypol/

>>61966537

Let's hope Trump removes Google from the internet. It is, after all, a public utility. If they can't behave in the public interest, they really ought not get to benefit from public infrastructure.

File: a.png (10KB, 533x96px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 533x96px

>>61966427

File: 410ef54701f2613f38206a6f624c966a[1].jpg (52KB, 613x793px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 613x793px

>>61966537
>hate speech
>memes are hate speech
>disagreeing with me is hate speech

>>61966198
>>61966559
>>61966449
Read here >>61966418 plus many other institutions that have been forced by the law or by some fine hurting someones feelings or denying them. This sort of shit only applies to the left stop being a blind libertarian kike.

File: 1503066681467.png (119KB, 296x296px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 296x296px

>>61966571
>Let's hope Trump removes Google from the internet.
Trump does not like anti semitism.
See: "his" daughter

>>61966466
>and specifics are beside the point

How are they? The specifics are important because the attack is coordinated across different entities at a specific target and it's presence on the internet. CANN, GoDaddy, Google, TOR. Everything you can cover.

>they do not need a reason

Well they certainly have one. And it's certainly in the name of silencing free speech.

>>61966175
> hate speech policy
W O W

>>61966560

>No one got censored for free speech
>They got removed for being a platform without speech restrictions

Hmmm.

Interesting and enlightened perspective you have, young man.

>>61966254
What is white supremacist care to explain to me what you mean by this?

>>61966456
If you're going to ban an app because racists use it then by that logic no social media app should exist.

And you're calling Gab a hate speech app, which is complete bullshit. I suppose you have examples of Gab being developed for hate speech purposes, right?

>>61966587

>Free Speech is Anti-Semitism

Hmmm. Interesting. I didn't realize censorship was an innately Jewish trait.

>>61966593
Did you read what I wrote?

>>61966535
The left when the right was in power:
>A Columbia University dean, John Coatsworth, has defended his university's invitation to Iran's anti-American ruler, Mahmoud Ahmedinejad, by saying that it would have been equally appropriate to invite Adolf Hitler to speak back when he was alive.

ISIS uses twitter and facebook to recruit and spread hate, but I suppose that doesn't matter.

>>61966591

Meanwhile, the reddit app remains.

The google app remains.

The twitter app remains.

The instagram app remains.

The youtube app remains.

The facebook app remains.

Now are you seriously going to tell me I can't find hate speech on these apps?

>>61966606
>>61966585
le ebic jew maymay is free-speech and anti-semite. Anti semite speech is not allowed in Google's terms of service. You didn't comply with it and got banned, and so you are whining here in /g/

Plain and simple

>>61966610

Yes. I summarized it quite succinctly, didn't I?

>>61966617
The left loves shitskins, this is no news.

>>61966447
The main reason Google is so dominant is due to network effect, which isn't caused by government intervention. The idea that government regulations are the only source of market power or barriers to entry is beyond absurd.

>>61966617
>>61966619

That's facebook's problem, they don't allow such activities either in ther ToS. If you see any valid complains, report to them instead of crying.

>>61966617
NOT ALL MUSLIMS

>>61966639
It's like saying
NOT ALL RIGHTES

>>61966629
No.
Take your medication and read it again, maybe this time your brain will work.

>>61966646
No, it's different. Not all Muslims are terrorists but all right-wings are racists.

>>61966449
>Let's outsource critical functions in today's society to private corporations!
>Yes, that way we can get around all those pesky limitations and duties placed on the government
What a time to be alive. Next up: Answering a political questionnaire before qualifying for help from 911.

File: Hmmm.jpg (44KB, 814x260px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 814x260px

>>61966626

>le ebic jew maymay

I'm sorry, but I don't have an opinion on the Jewish people. You are the one who just told me that being Jewish automatically made a person censorious.

This was something I wasn't aware of.

>You didn't comply with

I?

>got banned?

I?

>Anti semite speech is not allowed in Google's terms of service

I just googled an anti-semitic slogan using Googles own app.

Isnt' that interesting. It appears Google themselve are anti-semitic. Can we get them to remove themselves from themselves?

>>61966254
>calls others cucks
>hate his own race
why are leftist subhumans so stupid?

>>61966668
There are many right winger that actually are ill-informed, their hearts are at the right place. Same applies to the arabs

>>61966494

Private businesses operate under license from society. Fuck off lolbertarian

>>61966638

I reported the google app to google.

How long until you think they remove it from the Play Store?

File: rmyt.jpg (18KB, 583x328px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 583x328px

>self-styled "conservatives" complaining about a private entity doing what they want with their own property

>>61966651

Do you find that replacing logic with ad hominems usually works, or are you trying out something new?

>>61966692
read >>61966586

>>61966675
>>Let's outsource critical functions in today's society to private corporations
We did choose this

>>61966679
>I just googled an anti-semitic slogan using Googles own app.
>Isnt' that interesting. It appears Google themselve are anti-semitic. Can we get them to remove themselves from themselves?
Great, now report them for hate speech, and Google will take action, anon.

>I
Yes? No? Doesn't apply to you then

>>61966686
Not being an ethnic nationalist does not mean you hate people of your own race. That's like saying not being a creationist makes you a misanthrope.

Gab doesn't support hate speech, they just don't enforce any rules against speech (so long as it breaks no laws).

Google is trying to say its a hate speech app because it doesn't police what you can and cannot say, and that's just fucking wrong.

>>61966691
>I reported the google app to google.
If they see your report is valid they will take actions

>>61966690
Ok then, don't use their services

>>61966668

Not all racists are terrorists though, so I guess we're in the clear.

>>61966711
But anon, just remember the decreased taxes we were promised? Those that never happened?

I imagine Google will have to crack down on ISIS sympathizers now since all the shit going on in Spain, right? They can't allow that hate to continue.

>itt alt-right realizes big government regulation is a good thing and communism isn't so bad afterall

>>61966750
>since all the shit going on in Spain,
Finland too

>>61966712

>Google will take action

Imagine getting BTFO this hard that you have to devolve into fantasy to maintain your crumbling world view.

>>61966703
Complaining about ad hominems when there isn't any doesn't make your argument sound. You just made the same strawman twice without ever giving actually engaging in the discussion. Make an actual argument or fuck off.

>>61966750
Are they not doing this?

File: Alt-Left.jpg (264KB, 500x513px) Image search: [Google]

264KB, 500x513px

>>61966721
why do you "people" defend black and Jewish ethnic nationalists?

>>61966729

No tech oligarchs have a monopoly over the infrastructure of the internet and their services offer a wider service and utility to the public therefore they should be regulated and forced to provide a platform. It should also be illegal for companies to fire employees for their political speech

>>61966604
I don't know shit about Gab and don't care to know. All I saw was the OP saying it was removed for hate speech. If they feel they aren't a hate speech app maybe they should appeal and figure their shit out.
Google isn't taking your tax money, you have no rights with them. In fact you adhere to their TOS by using their service.
Go to a competitor if you don't like it.

I can't go to a newspaper and force them to take my classified ad. Why should an app store be forced to host your shit? Why should a domain registrar be forced to manage your domain? As long as they aren't barring you for illegal reasons you can fuck off.
You can't come to my house and host a nazi rally even if it is 100% legal. I don't want you there, and I can invite all the traps and leftists I want and you can't go whining about free speech. It's my fucking property that I pay for. And google developed their shit and the fact that they did it so well does not give you any fucking claim to it.

It's really fucking simple as long as you look at it objectively. You don't have to use Android, and even if you do, you don't have to use the Play Store to distribute your app, figure your shit out if someone doesn't want you in their house and stop fucking crying.

Frankly this goes to that homophobic baker bullshit too, but gays are legally protected so that causes problems, but frankly they shouldn't be forced to bake a cake for someone they don't want to bake for. Everyone is so fucking entitled to private businesses like they are fucking slaves who must do what you want and it's hilarious.

>>61966763
Why did you deviate from the argument?

>>61966773
>should
>should
Well, it's currently not

>>61966724

Will they?

I hope so. I feel bad about people no longer having google, facebook, twitter, reddit, instagram, snapchat or YouTube anymore though.

And as you said, google surely will delete all these services from their app store because it's an empirical fact that all of them can be used to communicate and receive hate speech.

>>61966778
>an actual reasonable post
a little surprised desu

>>61966704
Except that is a false equivalence because Google and Twitter aren't forced by the law.

>>61966778
Papers and tv stations are mandated by law to provide coverage and guaranteed cheap advertising for all political candidates before elections

>>61966770

No. They actually promote Islam on many of their services.

>>61966797
>Will they?
Yes, if they see your report is valid

File: fashy goys.png (542KB, 1060x510px) Image search: [Google]

542KB, 1060x510px

>>61966771
>you "people"

What part of "not being a white nationalist does not make you an antifa liberal retard" do you not understand?

>>61966771
Zionists are overwhelmingly right wingers. Trump himself is busy swallowing jewish semen since he got into presidency.

So ISP's are supposed to be net "neutral" and not censor any websites, yet all these SV companies are allowed to censor any non-leftist app/website ???

Hahahahah gtfo NN shills.

Give me 1 good reason why "net neutrality" shouldn't apply to tech companies as well.

>>61966768

Has avoiding the argument, projecting, and being needlessly crude worked for you in the past? Or is this also a new strategy your fine tuning.

>Fuck

That definitely makes what you say sound more emphatic, although I think a logical response is more appealing than tantrums.

That's one man's opinion of course.

>>61966805
Shouldn't they be forced by law? How is that false? The equivalence is that google and twitter SHOULD be forced by law.

>>61966811
why did I even bother asking

>>61966836
You're the one avoiding the argument. I already explained why your argument was fallacious (an strawman), and you just simply made the same failed argument again. Add something of substance to your next post, retard.

>>61966778

But you can go to a bakery and force them to bake your cake.

>Why should a company be forced to service you

Hmmm. Why are companies forced to provide google with equal bandwidth at a flat rate?

It's almost like the government routinely intervenes to force companies, especially public utilities, to service customers in a manner they don't wish to.

>Hate Speech

Hmmm. So Free Speech literally is hate speech now?

Someone better wake up the founding fathers and let them know they dun goofed.

>>61966750
>>61966811
American companies have to comply with the US's "anti-terror" policies, so they already are. Twitter has banned hundreds of thousands of accounts for supporting terrorists.

>>61966778
>Why should an app store be forced to host your shit?
Apps are a main mean of exposure and getting your voice out to an audience. Google play store controls about all of the app market of the Android ecosystem. Smartphone are an oligarchy with only really two ecosystems to choose from. Due to their importance in the public forum and lack of real competition they should be regulated heavily and forced to align their restrictions with the 1st amendment.

File: 1493866903615.png (85KB, 291x344px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 291x344px

>>61966175
> Gab speculated the move was related to the fact it apparently offered a job to James Damore, the Google engineer fired for penning a controversial memo about diversity.
Lmfao
/pol/ got cucked hard (HARD)

>>61966826

Do you honestly believe google is going to delete google and YouTube?

Sincerely.

Or are you lying.

Ask yourself...if you need to lie, do you think perhaps your initial assumptions might be wrong?

>>61966936
Why are you doing this?
You know the point he was making.
Googles actions are hypocritical.
To bad that does not count for anything today.

>>61966907
>not being a subservient leftist cuck makes you a cuck

>>61966778
>Google isn't taking your tax money
wew lad

>>61966880

>I simply dismissed your argument with an ad hominem and continue to deflect

Hmmm. I honestly think you can do better anon. Maybe try contributing to the discussion instead of avoiding it.

>>61966936
First of all, what's with your cringe inducing reddit spacing?
Second of all, for the third fucking time, if they see your report is valid, they will take actions, it's their decision.

>>61966846
That doesn't make sense. Crying about muh gay wedding cakes doesn't change the fact that Google made its own private decision.

>>61966963
ahaha
kekekekekeke are you actually implying you didn't just get cucked
lmfao

>>61966907
memo says diversity is great
it also says you should hire people based on their skills rather than their skin color

thats what the media defines as controversial

>>61966198
What about net neutrality?

>>61966963
>being a subservient cuck is okay if you aren't a leftist

>>61966970
An insult is not necessarily an ad hominem. Go read what it means before you make an idiot out of yourself again. If you are so averse to people insulting your low intelligence, perhaps reddït may be more of your taste.

Still no sound arguments from your part.

>>61966896

Twitter quite literally supports multiple Islamic personages and promotes Islam.

Why are you lying?

>>61966971
>cringe inducing reddit spacing
Are you 12 years old?

Good, apple rejected that shit because it was hosting porns

>>61967027
its a meme you dip

>>61967015
It says that there are some posts that should be restricted to women, right?

>>61966903
It's extremely easy to use app from outside the play store, your argument doesn't quite make it.

>>61967027


Hi


Fuck off to


plebbit

>>61966971

>reddit spacing

Hello newfriend!

>if they see your report is valid, they will take actions, it's their decision.

My report is valid. It's empirically correct. It's not about "seeing it as valid", it conclusively is.

Gab allows hate speech on their app. Google does too, as does Amazon.

Google will not remove the Google app or the Amazon app, and your claims that they will are blatant lies.

And when a person needs to lie to defend their position...well..it's obvious isn't it?

>>61967022
>Why are you lying?
Because I am not mentally ill and therefore cannot understand your warped concept of truth.
http://nypost.com/2016/08/18/twitter-bans-360k-accounts-for-supporting-terrorism/

>>61967054
Do you really think the average people have any clue about that? For them if it doesn't exist on the Play Store it doesn't exist.

>>61966831
NN is needed for ISPs because it's goddamn impossible to enter the ISP market. Google, one of the richest fucking companies on the globe couldn't keep up their attempt at entering the ISP market. That should tell you enough.

Conversely, you have tons of registrar options for domains and you can become a registrar for measly amounts of money. You can also develop and host your own app distribution method of your choosing.
You're literally comparing something that would cost something like 200k to develop (a simple website could distribute your app by downloading it to your phone if you wanted). Or to keep on the registrar option, it's significantly less. Like 40k or less. Entering the ISP market would cost billions. And you'd be actively lobbied against by the existing ISPs. No one is going to fight you becoming a registrar or creating a website.

Not to mention the people gave ISPs a metric fuckton of cash to put this infrastructure in to begin with. Tech companies didn't get their fucking money by hoarding taxes.

There's two reasons for you.

>>61967045
Nope. It does acknowledge that there's differences between how men and women work though.

>>61967069


Why do you type like this?


In 4chan, you don't need to add new lines to separate paragraph.


Is that hard to grasp?


What's your problem?

>>61967055

Jesus christ, I can't tell if this is /pol/ false flagging or a genuine newfag.

>>61967054
You don't get the exposure of the platform which is a main part of the argument. Plus Apple has denied their app like 8+ times can you gotta jump through hoops to get anything 3rd party on there.
>>61967075
this

>>61967086
>t. newfag

>>61967075
So what? You're not entitled to have your opinion easily accessible to two digit IQ people

>>61967054

Is it? Cause I don't know how to do it.

>>61966778
Basically this. It's also Church's right to refuse faggot marriage too. I find it funny that lefties said marriage isn't religion thing but they want faggot marriage to be allowed in Church which is sacred place for religion.

>>61966230
>>61966265
They don't have a monopoly, you just don't want to give up their services.

>>61966380
Freedom of association is just as basic of a freedom of free speech, if someone doesn't want to associate with you they don't have to, it's their platform, and even if they make it shit by removing decent social media platforms or blacklisting views they don't like, they have the right to do so, and you have the right to disassociate with them as well, in fact there are far better reasons to do so than this.

>>61966232
>>61966447
This

>>61967069
>all this reddit spacing
My eyes

>>61967069
>My report is valid.
Not for you to decide

>>61967071

Right, yet I can go on there right now and find multiple Muslims with blue checkmarks.

So, again, why are you lying?

>>61967069
>>61967086
>>61967115
Samefag

>>61966198
Monopolies don't get the free market excuse because there is no competition

>>61967077

>The free market is hard

>Therefore a handful of people should get to profit from the regulated market but then studiously avoid regulation and espouse free market values when it suits them

Noice.

>No one is going to fight you becoming a registrar or creating a website.

Interesting. Because ICANN banned The Daily Stormer.

If someone doesnt like you and they can hurt you they will
Stop fucking complaining about it
Host the bare repo on a private server with instructions to install
Ask for donations
Stop fucking shitting up the board you piece of shit
Your not fucking savvy or intelligent if you suck megacorp dick and dont know how to live without it
Learn how to fucking use computers god dammit

>>61966175
>Google
>hardcore leftist
Hm, didn't know Google was an anarcho-communist company.
themoreyouknow.jpg

>America
Liberals - left, conservatives - right

>Rest of the world
Liberals - right, conservatives - right

Why is everything in America so twisted and fucked? There is no real difference between liberals and conservatives.
t. hardcore leftist

>>61967097
Why do you even open your mouth if you're gonna backpedal after someone disagreed with you?

>>61967115
>find multiple Muslims with blue checkmarks.
Not him but what do you mean? Muslims can't have verified accounts?

Im pretty sure if that happened in the EU Google could expect some mega fines again.

>>61966322
I'd say start a new bank, but people like you are the reason the government enforces central banking that makes that impossible. Also, you'd have had to agree initially to some contract or terms that allowed them to do this, which would be your fuck up. Also, if no one wants to associate with you because of how shit of a person you are maybe you should reconsider where you stand.

A private organization not wanting to deal with you isn't a problem, come back when someone is actually threatening you physically like the government does.

>>61966560
A platform for people to excercise their free speech.

>>61967085

The fact that your asking demonstrates your extreme newsness, and to explain to you would see you rectify your newness, which would allow you to hide in plain site.

I'm not going to explain anything to you, because I want other people to identify you easily.

I will give you a hint - the text box altered sizes several years ago.

>>61967131
Jesus fuck, stop pressing enter twice you dumb mongrel

>>61967154
>the text box altered sizes several years ago.
Yeah, and people moved on. Are you autistic?

>>61967106
>I find it funny that lefties said marriage isn't religion thing but they want faggot marriage to be allowed in Church which is sacred place for religion.
State-recognized marriage is not the same as ceremonial marriage.
Leftists are no worse than the rightists that demand government be involved in personal life to begin with.

>>61967121

>the same person posted multiple times in a thread

...Wow.

Great work detective reddit.

>>61967135
By European standards the democrats are right wing. But because the democrats have to cover for the entire left wing they also get hardcore progressives mixed in.

>more /pol/ spam
why do they love /g/

>>61967136
How am I backpedaling? You can easily use apps from outside play store. That a large part of the population is too dumb for something so basic doesn't give you legal grounds for forcing Google to host an app on their store.

>>61967016
It's only important when bashing corporations.

>>61967165
Spot on

>>61967135

>Anarcho-Communist

pls stop, my sides can't take it anymore.

>There is no real difference beween Liberals And Conservatives

This explains how you overcame the cognitive dissonance when trying to meme anarcho-communism into existence.

>>61967109
>They don't have a monopoly
So why is Google constantly under fire by the EU antitrust regulators?

>>61967170
You're apparently too dumb to grasp the topic at hand, too.

>>61966586
Two things can be right at once, people shouldn't be forced to wed or bake for faggots and commies can do whatever they want with their botnet.

How hard is this concept?

>>61967138

Well, aren't we deplatforming people promoting hate ideologies that support terrorism?

Or are you saying Google has ulterior motives for removing an app like Gab?

>>61967153
There is no private entity in existence that truly promotes free speech because some things are straight up illegal to say for reasons other than the act of speech itself. It may not be right, but that is how the world works.

>>61967202
REEEEEE HOW DARE YOU CONSIDER NUANCE
FUCKING COMMIE FASCIST SCUM

>>61967168
>actions that shape the future of the Internet don't belong on /g/
Hello shill

>>61966449
I wouldn't use google if I had the choice between only two companies, apple or google and apple is even more puritan than google is

>>61967077
>NN is needed for ISPs because it's goddamn impossible to enter the ISP market.
Wrong.

Every other country on earth has healthy broadband competition.
Only USA does not, because only USA makes it legal for monopolies to exist and for ISPs to sue competitors into not providing service.

>>61967193
Because the EU is a bunch of communists that need to be firebombed.

>>61967162

I'm as autistic as you are new.

>>61967197
Not an argument

>>61967188
>cognitive dissonance
Anarcho-communism isn't Marxism so technically there is no paradox. It's a stupid ideology, but no more so than anarcho-capitalism.

>>61967222
Nice to see you ran out of arguments

>>61967217
This thread and the topic at hand is unarguably more politics than technology you dumb faggot.

>>61967121
>>61967180

samefag.

>>61967158

You can always go back, if you don't like how we format around here.

Hey. I got an idea. Try yelling reddit spacing again and then embarrassingly trying to claim you aren't summer.

>>61967207
>aren't we deplatforming people promoting hate ideologies that support terrorism?
Yes, what's your point? Are you going to pick the oldest 4chan meme of "lul muslims means terrorist" and then somehow claim that "lul christians doesn't automatically mean KKK"?

>>61967166
Democrats are right wing. The LGBT issues don't really matter in the grand scheme of things. It's all smoke and mirrors to make people think they're 'progressive' while supporting the status quo.

Getting transexuals into positions of power won't improve the lives of the working class. But liberals are dumb.

>>61967188
>meme into existence
An ideology with fleshed out theory which has existed for 200 years. Read a book, Ameritard.

File: 5fbabf08826827ec51a6a24284119a6e.jpg (27KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 400x400px

>>61967151
>I'd start a new bank.
Lol no you wouldn't.
>Also, if no one wants to associate with you because of how shit of a person you are maybe you should reconsider where you stand.
You do realize that the people deciding what is hateful and not are the same people who said that a drawing of a green frog was a hate symbol, right?
>You'd have to agree to these terms beforehand, so it's your own fault.
How about if suddenly ALL banks had those terms? Now what? That is the situation with the internet currently.
Also this >>61966500

>>61967236
You can't argue a non-argument, thanks for pointing that out.

>>61967222
>EU
>one of the biggest political defenders of market capitalism on the planet
>communists
Words have definitions, you retard. Not everything is about culture wars.

>>61966175
I'm happy they took down your dumb frog program.

>>61967228
Apparently, autism prevents you from learning to adapt. I get it now. How sad.

>>61967247
>faggot
Back to >>>/b/

>>61967256
>It's all smoke and mirrors
Getting lgbt into the workplace without fear of being fired due to what they do at home, will improve their lives, and in turn boost the working class.
But alas.

>>61967251
>if you don't like how we format around here.
>we
Are you ACTUALLY suggesting that there are other people ITT that are hell-bent on plebbit spacing?

>>61967251
>we
No, it's only you, mongrel

>>61967077
>NN is needed for ISPs because it's goddamn impossible to enter the ISP market.

Except there's hundreds of ISP's in America. Fact. Google failed because they had a retarded business model.

>You can also develop and host your own app distribution method of your choosing.

Except that actually costs billions. That's why there is only TWO legitimate app stores in all of mobile. Google PLay and Apple App Store. That's a true monopoly unlike the hundreds of ISP's.

>Not to mention the people gave ISPs a metric fuckton of cash to put this infrastructure in to begin with. Tech companies didn't get their fucking money by hoarding taxes.

Tax breaks is not the same as receiving money. Ask Elon Musk.

Apps are a legit oligopoly controlled by Apple and Google.

>>61967285
>Getting nazis into the workplace without fear of being fired due to what they do at home, will improve their lives, and in turn boost the working class.
But alas.

File: 1482046126139.jpg (260KB, 449x1197px) Image search: [Google]

260KB, 449x1197px

>>61967222
Never change, /pol/

>>61967131
I don't think ICANN banned them, first of all. The current registrars (who anyone can apply to be) have chosen not to host their domain, not ICANN.
So, again, they can just spend some money and become a registrar for themselves and all the other racist shitholes on the internet, if they want.
I guess you can take your
>The free market is hard.
and shove it back up your own ass.


And I'm not even sure where you're going with that first point anyway. You can do just about anything you want on the internet. You just can't rely on other people to hold your hand and push your message through their service. It's my megaphone. I created it. Get your own and fuck off. This doesn't apply for ISPs because the government gave them the money which they used to create the megaphone, so they don't get to just do whatever they want with it.

>>61967237

>No more than Anarcho-Capitalism

Capitalism and Anarchy can both function simultaneously. Anarchy and Communism can't. Anarcho-Communism requires democratic decisions, hence group consensus, and organization bodies. You could have Communism WITHIN Anarchy, but you can't have a mutual exisitence.

>>61967304
At least with google you can easily install apps from outside of the walled garden

>>61966778
Your post is riddled with lies

>>61967255

Oh. We're doing the "All Libertarians/Conservatives/White Nationalists Are Terrorists, but All Not All Muslims Are Terrorists" routine.

Gotchya

>>61967285
>Getting lgbt into the workplace without fear of being fired due to what they do at home, will improve their lives, and in turn boost the working class.
How is this not fundamentally a right wing argument? You could replace "lgbt" with some conservative demographic and the argument would be exactly the same.

>>61966427

someone who promotes incendiary conversation aimed at the undermining of a peoples based on a factor of their selves that they had no control over i.e. age race sex.

>>61967326

But normies won't be able to find your app.

That's why Floens pretty much gave up after Clover was removed from Play store for literally no reason.

>>61967289
>>61967300

Man, you guys really do know a lot about reddit. You sure do talk about it a lot.

Ever thought about going back?

>>61967219
Ok, so I figured we were talking about the US here based on (ALL OTHER CONVERSATION IN THE THREAD) and then you went on to say that it is, in fact, hard to enter the market in the US. Nice.

>>61967259
>Lol no you wouldn't.
I didn't say I'd do it, I said 'I'd say to do it', reading comprehension man, also you'd clearly have a market of all those hate speech violators, I'm sure you or someone else would love that clientele with no other options.

>same people who said that a drawing of a green frog was a hate symbol, right?
Wrong, most people laughed at this idea because pepe has been a normie meme for years.

>How about if suddenly ALL banks had those terms?
Unrealistic situation not accounting for the central banking monopoly government has. But I'd say to hide your cash under your mattress or something, this is assuming anyone hires you, I mean I'd imagine the same situation where everyone is denying you service they're also denying you employment, the banking thing might end up being a non-issue when you're homeless.

>That is the situation with the internet currently
No, it isn't.

>>61967356
Clover is still being updated, faggot.

>>61967324
>Anarcho-Communism requires democratic decisions, hence group consensus, and organization bodies.
And capitalism inherently requires hierarchy in the form of property ownership. Capitalism (in the actual definition, not American garbling about freedumbz) requires a state by nature; an "anarcho-capitalist" business would essentially be a state by definition. Same bullshit, different sphincter.

>>61967356
That's why people need to know play store isn't the only store, when there is no competition the monopolies can do whatever they want

>>61967345
You literally are doing the exact same fucking thing

>>61967363
No one else got healthy competition by lottery - we had to fight for it.
Tooth and nail in some cases.

Worth it.

>>61967356

And that's why Tech CEO's are afraid to defend net-neutrality because they massive hypocrites:

http://gizmodo.com/techs-biggest-ceos-are-too-chickenshit-to-defend-net-ne-1797412398

>>61967362
I was sent from /r/ the donald. Am I one of the kool kids now?

>>61967266
>EU
>Defender of market capitalism
Yeah, no. The EU is a regulatory body.

File: frogposters.jpg (155KB, 500x492px) Image search: [Google]

155KB, 500x492px

>>61967397
>/r/
like clockwork

>>61967377
KYS degenerate phoneposter enabler

File: be9.jpg (42KB, 460x500px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 460x500px

>>61967207
Fuck, how retarded can you possibly be?

Also, banning fucking idiots on Twitter is free speech. Twitter has every right to choose who has the right to talk on their site.

Literally, all you have to do to not get banned is not be a dick. How hard is it to not be a dick?

>>61967409
>>>/r/ xd

>>61967285
But they don't feel themselves a part of the working class. That's where liberals differ from real leftists.

Leftists see workers as working class, not because it's an identity, but because that is something they don't have control over. People are working class because of their relationship to the means of production and the goal is to make everyone an owner of the means of production and therefore get rid of classes, class society and working class 'once and for all. A leftist sees a black transexual worker and they see a worker.

Liberals on the other hand believe working class is just another identity among hundreds. When they look at a black transexual worker they see someone who is black AND a transexual AND working class. They rank people in some sort of oppression olympics and the more non-white male identities you have the more oppressed you are.

Liberalism also differs from leftism because liberals want to change the system and make it more friendly to the people who have a non-white male identity. Leftists want everyone to be the owner of their means of production because that will empower you.

The idea is that oppression only works if there is someone who CAN oppress you. If you're a worker, you can be oppressed by being fired. If you're your own boss, then no one can fire you and you can't be oppressed.

Liberals also want to change how people think. In their mind if someone thinks racist thoughts they're oppressing the people against whom they're racist... magically. Which makes no fucking sense. You can't change the way people think, but you can create material conditions in which real oppression is impossible.

A person who rents out apartments hates transexuals. He can deny renting to transexuals or increase their rent, and thus oppress them. But if you remove private property and landlord-renter relationships you remove an avenue of oppression. That person can continue hating transexuals all they want without any real effect.

>>61967402
>The EU is a regulatory body.
...And? Regulated market capitalism is still capitalism. There is no contradiction here.
It's only contradictory by the Austrian definition of capitalism, and the Austrian School is even more retarded than Marxism is.

>>61967317

>I don't think ICANN banned them

I'm dubious on the claim, but that's what is being reported. Which is a big problem if true, considering they don't host illegal material.

>The free marketis hard
>and shove it back up your ass

I could, but that still wouldn't change the fact that you are claiming;

>It's okay to utilize government intervention when it suits me, but demand free market privileges when it doesn't

>You can do just about anything you want on the internet.

Sure. Except register domains that upset people.

>You just can't rely on other people to hold your hand and push your message through their service. It's my megaphone. I created it. Get your own and fuck off.

Funny this logic doesn't apply upstream from google though right? Funny that I should get my own and fuck off, but I get my own ISP and tell google to fuck off, we need the government to step into dat durr free market and grab the reigns.

>This doesn't apply for ISP's

Of course not, because that would make your entire argument defunct.

>the government gave them money

The government gave google money too.

>So they don't get to do whatever they want with it

Good. We agree.

>>61967417
Twitter strives to be an open platform compared to sites like 4chan that try to be exclusive and elitist

>>61966431
Google is censoring Gab.ai because it's the only surface web location left for the neonazi 'The Dailystormer.' They publish as screenshots via the owner's Gab account. Google wants to eradicate DS. My conspiracy theory is it is a test of capability like Facebook tested its ability to manipulate user emotions

>>61967382

I'm aware of that, my man.

>>61967390
They know it'll help them against smaller competitiors. They're too big to be left out of the equation, so ISPs will offer them better deals. The small competitiors will pay full price and die.

>>61967430
To add: people can hate whomever they want. I don't care about changing minds. You want to be a racist and hate niggers and not hang out with them? That's your prerogative, I won't spend any time trying to change your mind.

Liberals want to change mind and control thought, leftists want to change material conditions, our relation to the means of production and give everyone control over their lives.

File: 1496444863111.jpg (87KB, 637x622px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 637x622px

>>61966478
Government is the biggest, most powerful, and largest revenue corporation of the world pulling in ~$4 trillion in a single year.

Dumb-ass upstarts forget this once they've gotten gotten big enough to throw around their weight. Then comes the reminder that they're nothing ...

They're literally being provided the rope to hang themselves but are too arrogant to see it.

>not using fdroid

File: f98.jpg (61KB, 511x511px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 511x511px

>>61967432
>Regulated market capitalism is still capitalism
>Austrian School is even more retarded than Marxism is
>He actually believes this

>>61967430
>>61967465
Wew lad someone is behind the times. The 70s called and they want their leftism back.

>>61967312
nazis have easy access into the workplace and have for decades tho

>>61967417

>How retarded can you be

Not an argument.

>Also, banning fucking idiots on Twitter is free speech. Twitter has every right to choose who has the right to talk on their site.

1. That's not speech.

2. Do I have every right to tell faggots to bake their own cakes and cross dressers to piss in the male bathrooms?

>not be a dick

But that's not true.

>How hard is not to be a dick?

Well, you seem to be struggling with it?

Also...Why are you talking about twitter?

Can we please stop calling the SJW-gender-fluid-proudly-bipolar-safe-space nonsense (which is mostly specific to USA only anyway) "leftist"?

Here's an actual leftist idea: how about tech workers fucking unionize? I can assure if anyone at Google wrote a memo about that, the management would literally shit themselves and fire the person the very same day. But yeah, Google is "leftist".

>>61967478
The fact it's still quite obscure is saddening

File: 1455759418155.png (110KB, 398x345px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 398x345px

>>61967374
Jesus fucking christ this flat denial.
>No, it isn't.
Except it is, if it wasn't then we literally wouldn't have this discussion in the first place.
>Wrong, most people laughed at this idea because pepe has been a normie meme for years.
Except the ADL is working with google as well as twitter, the ADL being the very ones who classified it as a hate symbol in the first place.
>Hide your cash under the mattress.
Avoiding the point now, eh?
>Situation is totally unrealistic.
Except for when it happened, but you'd just ignore that as well, wouldn't you?
Not having a bank will prevent you from even paying for a lot of the most basic and essential things, since so many services today flat out require you to pay through the bank.

>>61967441
The government gave google money to develop their products? They took taxes from people to fund Android development and the Play store and Gmail etc.?
Where did you get this information I've never seen this anywhere.

File: 1485296430111.png (261KB, 1048x1024px) Image search: [Google]

261KB, 1048x1024px

You could've prevented this

>>61967500
Could you please tie a rope at a tall, sturdy structure and then around your neck on top of a tall chair and then kick off the chair?

File: lain_laughing.gif (295KB, 700x704px) Image search: [Google]

295KB, 700x704px

>>61966175
>Itt: /pol/ trying to make convincing arguments, but failing because they're fucking retards with no logical capabilities

Can we just fucking stop? This shit is stupid and is making you guys look like retards. Using big words doesn't make you smart. Using circular logic doesn't make your argument stronger.

This isn't fucking preschool, where you can wave your dick around and impress people

>>61967450

The Daily Stormer is a twitter/reddit clone retard. Not a host. Daily Stormer isn't "on" there.

Gab was nominally deleted because it's a platform that endorses free speech, and they claim (without proof) it's because they offered an ex google fag a job.

>>61967491
There's many of us on the left who don't like that the movement is being co-opted and infiltrated by liberals who want to push their idpol agenda.

It's basically capitalism trying to destroy an anti-capitalist movement by making it 'work' within the system.

I find it disgusting that many who call themselves 'leftist' voted and campaigned for Hillary, or Bernie. In an unfair game the only right move is not to play.

>>61967430
>But they don't feel themselves a part of the working class.
ummmmmm

>>61967497
A guy was literally just fired from google because they disagreed with his opinions, meanwhile lgbt will have a literal quota and as such a massive advantage when searching for jobs.

>>61966198
These rules no longer apply when the entire world relies on your company for day-to-day survival.

File: richard_stallman_75.jpg (68KB, 1200x794px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 1200x794px

>>61967518
They wouldn't listen

>>61967465

>give a small cadre of people control over everyone elses life

ftfy

Why are /leftypol/ and friends raiding so hard lately anyway? Is it just over the speed bump rally incident?

>>61967465
That's bullshit, even far left political groups that claim to be against identity politics will kick you out for being prejudiced in some way. The far right is just honest about their biases, they don't pretend to be rational because their ideology doesn't require rationality.

For most people, all politics are identity politics, because most people are either narcissistic or too stupid to have self-awareness and a sense of objectivity.

>>61967527
Leftism has been completely destroyed by those who don't give care about the working class, it's the right who strive for the working class now

>>61967441
If ICANN bothered banning people why would they leave shit like stormfront up? I don't think they police domains that way, but if 30/30 of the registrars don't want to maintain the DS domain they would be effectively "banned' until some 31st registrar signed up and hosted it. All it takes is money, and not much either.

>>61967550
People don't suddenly die one by one if Google was shut down, retard.

File: everyone I dont Like.jpg (57KB, 600x774px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 600x774px

>>61967523
>Using big words doesn't make you smart.
but none of those words were big. unless if you have problems reading.

>Using circular logic doesn't make your argument stronger.
there was no circular logic either

>This isn't fucking preschool, where you can wave your dick around
you must have went to one fucked up preschool

I don't get it. Google gets money from apps. Why do they don't allow apps as long as they are not malicious?

>>61967500

It's illegal to fire a person for discussing union formation.

Tech workers don't unionize because the positions that suck are confined to temp visa holders from overseas who can't unionize.

Why do you think the techn industry is so furious about discussions regarding immigration restriction?

Same reason the agricultural sector is. Choking off maleable labor.

File: 20620748.jpg (49KB, 640x791px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 640x791px

TLDR:

>Fuck with google
>Hurr durr google come at me, I'll hire the faggot you just fired lol
>kys silicon valley trash hahahaha xDDD
*google kicks you out*
>waaaaaa
>waaah what did we do waaa
Who saw this coming

They are a private company and are not beholden to free speech.

Maybe you should have all thought of that before giving any one entity so much power.

>>61967553
>>give a small cadre of people control over everyone elses life
If your argument against someone's ideology is that they are lying about actually believing in it, that's quite a compliment to the ideology itself.

>>61967587
btfo
/Thread

>>61967587
Google literally bullied them out

File: 1464479715826.jpg (107KB, 593x676px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 593x676px

>>61967019
only leftists can be cucks

>>61967544
He was fired at google primarily because Google cultivates a certain perspective. That's like going to a gay gym and being perplexed they aren't fine with you blaring a mein kamph audiobook.
Also, there is zero lgbt quota in existence. It's only race and gender.

>>61967517

Google received 254 million dollars from North Carolina alone to build a Data Center in the state.

Do you really want to keep having this discussion?

>>61966175
will they remove all muslim prayer apps as well?

>>61967526
Sorry that trying to inform people makes me a retard to you. I don't share the same love of Nazi propaganda that you do so I don't know the details though I have a gab account and I've seen the screenshots of the Dailystormer are being distributed on Gab by its owner. (repeated against because you are a fucking idiot) Google banned Gab because Nazis. (And you don't agree despite the recent Cville rally, fucking idiot confirmed) Maybe it was the Jews

>>61967587
Why do right wingers cry so much about everything? lol

I have a hunch the ONLY reason why we have so many /pol/t_d crosspost spammers these days is because they're scared other groups will treat them the same way they've been treating minorities for centuries now.

>>61967562
Politics exist outside of the American two-party system, senpai. The Trump administration isn't even that different from what Clinton would have likely done.

>>61967587
>Actually taking a miniature app seriously enough to remove them entirely
That's too overwhelming

>>61967581
Google has outed themselves as a hardcore leftist organization that don't allow any diversity when it comes to political views, Gab is popular amongst the alt-right, hence them allowing it on their market would be against their views.

>>61967218
nobody is forcing you to use Google OR apple
get a phone with sailfish

>>61967517
>>61967610
it is quite obvious to anyone who doesnt keep their head up their ass that Google, along with Facbook, are supported by the government because they are used as spying engines to keep tabs on people in the US and worldwide

Has the right built anything in technology LMAOOOOO
They're like niggers of the tech world

>>61967568

They do police domains that way, just usually not domains that aren't involved in illegal activity.

From what Weev said it appears no registrars will touch them and ICANN won't allow them to sign up. He's a notorious liar though, so who knows.

It's so censored by Google that you can use Google to find the apk in 5 seconds.

>>61967592
Maybe you should have read the thread before posting the same shit that's been posted a dozen times.

>>61967625
>for centuries
i didn't know 4chan or reddit is that old

>>61967641
Weev is a might white activist who takes down big government and jews, he never lies

>>61967610
>Google received 254 million dollars from North Carolina
In tax breaks I would assume?

>>61967625
That's your main problem alt-left. You think that I have anything to do with tge group or my ancestors. I'm an idividual and I demand being judged only based on my personal actions.

>>61967595

My argument is that that is the ideology unless some sort of magic occurs to bridge a gap in the ideology not yet filled.

Sort of like Hitler explaining that Lebensraum would solve the bread basket issue, and yet not specifying exactly how this land would be occupied by Germans and not millions of Slavs.

>>61967587
>>61967598
>>61967625
>>61967639
Ultra low quality poster pretending """""pol""""" is the problem of this board.

>>61967603
>He was fired at google primarily because Google cultivates a certain perspective.
>I'll just rephrase it so it sounds better.
It's more like being fired from working at a gym because you disagreed with the other employees blowing each other during working hours.

Nobody forces you to use Google services and there are plenty of alternatives. Shut your national Socialist whore mouth.

>>61967671
>so it sounds better
That wasn't the intention at all, but whatever, grasping onto petty shit in hopes one wins an argument online. Truly enlightened!
Also he wasn't even hired because of his skills LMAO how embarrassing

>>61967668
>/pol/
>high quality posts
Don't kid yourself

File: 1494033868339.jpg (135KB, 800x580px) Image search: [Google]

135KB, 800x580px

>>61967498
You have every right to say whatever you want. However, I have every right to not let you say it on my website.

Spouting hate speech is the textbook definition of being a dick. If you step onto my private property and start saying dumb shit, I have every right to kick you out because it's my private property. I don't have to enable your dumbass.

Banning fucking idiots on Twitter is can be symbolic speech. It's saying that dumb shit isn't allowed on their site, so go find somewhere else to talk.

And yeah, asking you how retarded could you be isn't an argument. It's a fucking question, so answer it.

>>61967641
"won't allow them to sign up" likely translates to "you have to pay us to become a registrar sir"

>>61967535
Well, the thing about class is that it's not a feeling. But liberals equate feeling like something with being something. That's why being gay or a transexual has become a radical action in itself.

They feel like members of minorities, of LGBT, of whatever, and among all those things they may feel like working class. But thing about working class you're it whether you feel like it or not.

Lumpenproletariat are those who are working class but without any class consciousness. Basically sheep.

>>61967562
Listen. I'm not going to deny that fascism as an economic system doesn't work. Yes, everyone feeling like one homogenous nation and pulling towards a common goal creates a successful society, no shit.

The problem with fascism is that the reality is that nation-states aren't homogenous. Going far enough back in time you realise most countries were tribes who were then united under the same banner and name because some rich fucker called himself king and wanted to wage war against another king.

Hitler invented the idea of an Aryan/German race, described it and said we are that. He wasn't even German, and he wasn't blonde.

People didn't live in a vacuum and people got mixed. That's the reality. And I don't mean mixed black and white, I mean some Germans mixed with Slavs, or Nords, some Anglos mixed with Nords etc.

Having a truly homogenous nation-state is impossible and therefore fascism is impossible. It's just reality.

HOWEVER, those who work the means of production but don't own them are workers, no matter your race, colour, sexual orientation or flavour of mental illness. ;)

>>61967659

Right. Just like the Telco's.

Unless you're saying the Telco's being paid for providing a service to the government in building fiber networks is a "handout", rather than a private company being paid for a service.

>>61967689
who are you quoting?

>>61967509
>Except it is, if it wasn't then we literally wouldn't have this discussion in the first place.
But it isn't. Not even in the slightest.
>Except the ADL is working with google as well as twitter, the ADL being the very ones who classified it as a hate symbol in the first place.
Google's hate speech policy wasn't written by the ADL, and they work WITH them not for them, Google makes their own decisions on who and what to remove. Find me one shred of evidence this decision was made by the ADL.

>Avoiding the point now, eh?
No, I attempted to provide a solution to your hypothetical problem, you'd expanded it to the point that every bank, as unrealistic as that is has denied you service. I'd imagine you need some other way to store your funds.

>Not having a bank will prevent you from even paying for a lot of the most basic and essential things, since so many services today flat out require you to pay through the bank.
My rent and electric bills can be paid by cash, not sure about you. But I'm curious what exactly you're considering essential. Also, I'd suggest paying someone else to use their accounts. I mean, I'd pay your bills for a "transactional" fee.

>Except for when it happened, but you'd just ignore that as well, wouldn't you?
I'm curious.

The funny thing is, even if you couldn't live in this situation, the fact is that no one is responsible for you who doesn't want to be. Even if every single other person in the world decided to say fuck you because of your opinion they have no obligation to serve you in any way, whether the result of this be your death or not. But you're not alone in your opinions, and I'm sure you and people who agree with you can help each other out, and separate from those who've denied you.

Of course, the only people who could stop you would be... the government. Are they leftist too?

>>61967709
That's all nice and dandy, but they do feel like the working class and they are the working class.

>>61967689
I don't know, I don't go there. But something on the Internet happens and you might want to talk about it on /g/ and here come hoards of shit flingers like >>61967677.

maybe they should make progressive webapp instead so that hey don't have to rely on kike cartel for app distribution and updates
it looks like they can't into apple store for similar reasons anyways so no reason to worry about ios browsers incompatibility

this would reach more users than alternative app marketplaces

>>61967724
Or low qual posts like >>61967668
and >>61967665
or how about >>61967602
oh wait, you agree with them therefore you didn't call them out
interesting
you aren't anywhere near as objective as you pretend

>>61967723
They don't, though. That's the problem. If you mention class as the uniting factor they call you a 'class reductionist'.

>>61967741
>relying on google funded and built tech
So this is why "the right" is so pissed they fired that guy. They love google services and products, they just can't get away huh.

>>61967628
holy shit, dont tell this to the normies theyll start calling you a centrist, as if its the new pejorative term to use, and saying your stupid and tell you that the ONLY option is to pick the party that is slightly less shitty than the other party

>>61967677
>NatSocs taking the Soc part too far
Kind of refreshing

>>61967575
Maybe I shouldn't have quoted OP.

My statement still stands though. This thread is what I said it is.

Can anyone post the list of all tech companies' actions against the alt-right?
I need to make a GNU/meme

>>61967701

>However, I have every right to not let you say it on my website.

Call me when I have every right not to bake a faggot a cake.

>Spouting hate speech is the textbook definition of being a dick.

Yet it covers every square inch of twitter, with very little of it resulting in repurcussions for the poster.

>If you step onto my private property and start saying dumb shit, I have every right to kick you out because it's my private property.

Do you though? Because under Net-Neutrality I don't have the right to kick twitter off my ISP.

I have to enable your dumbass.

>Banning fucking idiots on Twitter is can be symbolic speech.

>symbolic

lol

Kicking crossdressing faggots out of my restaurant is also taking a stand - It's saying that I find your sexual dysfunction sad and pathetic but I won't entertain it.

>It's saying that dumb shit isn't allowed on their site, so go find somewhere else to talk.

But dumb stuff is allowed on their website - and if you go and try and find somehwere else to talk, they'll try and shut that down too.

>And yeah, asking you how retarded could you be isn't an argument. It's a fucking question, so answer it.

Well, I don't have to deflect from my lack of logical arguments with ad hominems and vulgarity. So I'm pulling ahead of you on that point.

>>61967761
Ok first things first, don't have arguments on twitter.
Second, they do 100%. Hence why socialism and communism are relatively popular, because they place emphasis on the working class.
Finally, reducing everything to class does seem to be a little limiting though.

File: 1503057747324.jpg (94KB, 480x359px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 480x359px

Thd Dailystormer "controversy" that kicked off the censorship was instigated by a viral article about why Heather Heyer deserved to die because she was fat and childless.
O the irony. Neonazis poison everything they touch. Google did nothing wrong

>ITT: Leftists and Rightists hate on each other rather than the government that equally allows both sides to be oppressed, spied on, taken advantage of, and stolen from

Yes Goy, they are playing right into our hand

Why is "right-wing" and "hate speech" being used synonymously this past week? Isn't there a bunch of "left-wing" stuff that basically promotes the same thing, but with different targets? It's not like i'm hearing about Jezebel or certain Tumblr's being removed?

Meh, maybe i sound like /pol/, but I just think this whole thing is stupid. It internet isn't this serious, all this "hate speech" is nothing more than activist being activist. They always end up fighting and get rowdy, ask the hippies;