Save your fanboy shit

>>61956328
No.

>>61956346
thanks, mate appreciate it! I heard the %30 performance difference can translate to like 10 fps at most depending on the game.

>>61956328
1080 ti is worth it, in two years you can probably add another one onto it and play in 4k for a year or two before it starts getting outdated.

The 1080 will last you 2 years at 1440p not sure about max but close to it!

>>61956441
1080 will play every game at max or almost max settings at 1440p 60fps.

>>61956549
1080 Ti is only worth it for 4k resolution.

>>61956328
the Ti by itself is probably the second best card you can get in terms of pricing and gaming.

>>61956364
You might also want to get a Gsync monitor (or Freesync if you go with Vega, same performance but could be cheaper depending on country and electricity).

>>61956588
on it but thanks good to know on the right track.

>>61956588
Does running a game at 4k on a 1440p screen or 1080p screen make much of a difference in terms of looks?

>>61956328
An extra $400? No. 1080ti offers roughly 20% more performance, but that premium doesn't justify that.

What exactly is the price of them anyway? It's meant to be a $200 difference at MSRP.