TV specs

Depends on size, really all I worried about was the resolution being at least 1080p, refresh rate marketed as at least 120hz, and reasonably priced. Believe in yourself OP

>>61951347
At 40-50 inches range, not something extreme

>>61951324
Must
>4k
>65"+
>LED back light

Not a neet
>HDR

Your rich
>OLED display

>>61951364
>>>4k
>>65"+
no monies for that unfortunately, looking into 1080 40-50 inches range

>>61951347
Unless you want 3d 120hz is unecessary. 60hz is in the necessary catagory.

>>61951378
I'd go 4k at that size

I had a 65" LG oled and had issues with burn in after a month which pissed me off so returned it. Got a Samsung qled and it's been great for 5 months so far. Image quality isn't quite as good as the oled but no burn in worries so fuck it. I will go oled again if they ever sort the burn in issues. For normal TV it's fine I'm sure but games with his elements really fuck with oled still

>>61951378
What exactly is your budget? Walmart sells 4k 50" for $279.

>>61951394
True, a lot of tv's will say 60 but really only have a refresh of like 30 or some garbage. I bought a 49 inch Toshiba and it's 60hz and I have no complaints desu. I'd say brand is more important for like longevity and warranty

>>61951436
I'm in Greece and prices are a bit inflated

https://www.skroutz.gr/c/12/television/f/356338/4K-Ultra-HD.html?order_by=pricevat&order_dir=asc