wats the highest quality image format

RAW

>>61946497
Literally a search away.

https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-highest-quality-image-file-format

PNG is the FLAC of image file formats

>>61946526
That's tiff and bmp shithead

>>61946535
shutup bitch you don't know what you're talking about. you probably think FLAC is true lossless

>>61946552
What's archival grade audio then fuckboi
Flac can range in compression just like PNG bmp and tiff do

>>61946526
>>61946535
tiff and png can both be lossy. BMP is the only one that can't be lossy. Big as fuck, though.

>>61946566
Note: CAN BE
If you're not retarded then this isn't an issue

>>61946561
WAV ? You tell me mr know it all

>>61946497
4K

>>61946566
But do PNG and BMP support 12-bit color depth?

File: E9Mp2wb.gif (4MB, 720x480px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 720x480px

>>61946601
>Wav
Get off /g/

>>61946566
FLAC can be lossy as well
Ever tried converting lossy like mp3 back to lossless?

>>61946624
quit stealing reaction images from imgur transplant

>>61946526
This.

.dng

>>61946566
>>61946653
BMP can be lossy as well
Ever tried converting lossy like jpg back to lossless?

ITT: People don't know that difference between lossy and lossless compression.

this thread is confusing

>>61946497
.jpg but just set it to 100% quality, dumbasses

>>61946512
This because i can basically retake the photo of the lighting is off. Its the digital negative

>>61946653
You're retarded. Aren't you?
You made a lossless copy of a lossy file

>>61946526
>>61946535
>>61946566
>>61946616
BMP is great and all, as is RAW, but if we're going for quality here and not features or much else, there's a reason astronomers use FIT/FITS. Each pixel isn't restricted to integer values. If you divide out flats, far less is lost as the values are floating point. It's a format literally designed for astronomy, for people whose livelihood depends on quality in their image format. Surely not practical for most use, and it certainly isn't practical for use with a monitor, but it is definitely better than those two when it comes to quality.

>>61947987
>This scanner sucks it wont fix and make a perfect copy of this crumpled up ripped picture

H.265, AV1 or Daala intra would be the best lossy image format.

Is there an image format that can only be posted on 4chan?

>>61948108
webm?

>>61946624
Are you retarded? You rip audio as a .wav and then convert it to FLAC you mong.

ICCv4 compatible and RAW~some decent and latest img format

>>61948159
or you could just rip directly to flac

File: 2624954118.jpg (139KB, 630x628px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 630x628px

>>61948465
>wants perfect rips
>rips directly to a compressed format

>>61946526
>not FLIF

>>61949186
>listens to anything but WAV
enjoy your lost data

>>61946512
/thread

>>61949610
This guy gets it.

>>61949610
Had no idea about FLIF. The compression ratio... Woah. The progressive decoding beats the living shit out of adam7. That's impressive.

>>61946526
flif. \free lossless image format.

>JPEG-XR will never get traction even though it is open sores for ages.
Literally the only good format microsoft made in ages and we still use fucking jpeg to everything, It is pretty amazing to compress images with 4:4:4 colors at very small sizes.

>>61949669
I can't tell who's meming who at this point.