Why are QT applications always better than their GTK equivalents?

>>61940642
i want to fuck whatever that thing is

>spats
M U H
U
H

>>61940642
It is because C++ programmmers focus on important features while C programmers focus on shit tier ecosystems, reimplementing linked lists and on being sperglords.
It even shows within the GTK ecosystem, if you compare MyPaint with other painting software for GTK.

>>61940711
>C programmers focus on shit tier ecosystems, reimplementing linked lists and on being sperglords.

nah thats c++ folks too

>>61940642
They can do much more things in the same time in c++ than in c at a cost of minimal performance loss

Krita fucking sucks. I'm actually pissed at how shit it really is, like holy fuck, why cant we get a proper Paint Tool SAI replacement. Their excuse for a brush engine is horseshit.

>>61940737
C++ programmers use things like boost while C programmers implement their own library because all of the existing ones aren't minimal enough for them.

>>61940737
only the 3rd
>>61940743
if at all, most c stuff is probably slower because most c programmers can't compete with std::ANYTHING

>>61940642
Have you ever tried extending a GUI application written in C?

There's your answer.

>>61940642
GTK Is shit rotten and old shit, QT modern Framework for development aplications.

Like compare PHP4 and Java 9

>>61940642
Because these Qt applications are comparatively newer and more fresh

>>61940642
most of qt applications are ugly and full of bloat and bugs

>>61940642
Krita and GIMP aren't exactly "equivalents", Krita is a digital painting program and GIMP is a tool for photo editing.