https://www.intel.com/content/www/u s/en/products/processors

>>61918951
>9W
DOA

>>61918951
>Atom
>8 cores
>8 threads
what

with the same clockrate and IPC shit as the old atom N270 released in 2008

so it's still laggy while browsing the internet

>>61918951
> 8 cores/8 threads
> 25W
> locked 2.2GHz
I just can't imagine any use case for this one.

>>61919034
Home server/pfsense firewall should work beautifully. I don't know what sort of iGPU these have, but it should work well as a low-power HTPC too with a cheap graphics card which can do hardware decode if the iGPU can't.

>>61919065
Until raven ridge arrives that is.

>>61919005
Have you been living under a rock

>>61919005
>not seeing the 16 cores 16 threads one

>>61919086
this

intels only response to ryzen has been to add more cores

SEGMENT
E
G
M
E
N
T

>>61918951
Any tablet shit?

>>61918951
what is this, intel's way of blowing away cheap ARM servers?
like >>61919065 said, small servers/routers are the only thing I'd consider using this shit for.

File: wew.png (22KB, 984x238px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 984x238px

>>61919065
> iGPU
those are aborted Xeons anon, no graphics.

>>61919103
http://www.cnx-software.com/2017/08/14/intel-gemini-lake-block-diagram-and-yet-more-info/

You have to wait for Gemini Lake but I don't know if any company will even make a Gemini Lake tablet

>>61919120
jesus christ

>>61918951
frankensoc

>>61919145
It's for low power servers, what you need iGPU for?

I wonder if it's faster than those gaming consoles' jaguar.

>>61919082
For HTPC? Yeah, Raven Ridge should do great. Will Raven Ridge have ECC like these Atoms? You wouldn't need the kind of graphics hardware Raven Ridge will have for server/router duty anyway.

>>61919186
>>61919209
>atoms for servers
These shitbirds are good for NASs at best.

• Silvermont (22nm) a Airmont (14nm) = 2-wide decode
• Goldmont (14nm) = 3-wide decode
• Goldmont Plus (14nm) = 4-wide decode

Wait for Goldmont PLus for your pfsense/freenas/openvpn machine

Shit, it looks like it doesn't even have a iGPU, DOA DOA DOA DOA DOA DOA


Also lot of coverage including numbers here
https://www.servethehome.com/

https://www.servethehome.com/intel-atom-c3955-16-core-top-end-linux-benchmarks-review/

THANK YOU BASED INTEL

>>61919235
Goldmont Plus Atoms like this won't be available until next year earliest, Avoton/Rangeley had 3 years on the market before Denverton just replaced them today then again it's doubtful since this market isn't like consumer market which needs new products every year

Yeah, gonna need 3 years of testing unless you want another repeat of
http://www.guru3d.com/news-story/intel-atom-c2000-chips-are-bricking-products.html

File: Intel-Atom-C3000-Denverton-Launch-SKU-List-1-Formatted.jpg (104KB, 855x374px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 855x374px

>>61919235
>Intel Atom C3000 series will have at least four different QAT variants
>four different QAT variants

FUCK OFF INTEL

>>61919065
>25w router

No thanks.

>>61919225
Should be fine for most home server use cases and it should be fine in general for SOHO NAS type things or cold storage/archival. Not everything is CPU-intensive, I don't think you know what you're talking about.

>>61919225
Anon, even a baytrail tablet is faster than Core2

>>61919235
>Networking on the Intel Atom C3000 series still appears to require an external PHY

>still no replacement for Xeon-D

Really Intel?

>>61919292
>implying you run your router at full load at all times

>>61918951
>$500 for an atom

>>61919292
Learn what load is you fuckface, these things will be running idle 98% of the time with a burst load of some 10-15W here and there.
Unless you're running openvpn at 1Gbit/s there's no chance it will run at 25W

Since I can't wait for my NAS setup I'm getting this + a lot of ECC for FreeNAS, pfsense machine can wait until goldmont plus, snort will really need that single thread increase.

Otherwise hopefully there's a Xeon-.D replacement in the works, would love a Xeon-D router due to the integrated PHY

>>61919314
>Choosing 25w FULL GAYMIN LOAD chip over 10w load

unless this is going into a 48 port switch, it's horribly overpowered for a pf sense box

>>61919334
>$0.02 has been deposited into your intel account
good goy.

>>61919378
>unless this is going into a 48 port switch, it's horribly overpowered for a pf sense box

That's why the lineup goes from 2 cores to 16 cores

2 cores don't support QAT, so useless for forward looking pfsense setups.

>>61919390
I was specifically referencing the 25w 8c8t model

Only 32GB support? This is in no way shape or form enough to support 60TB ZFS dedpulicated setups (5GB per TB)

>>61919378
>Choosing 25w
You can pick another one you know, they apparently go down to 2C/9W.
>FULL GAYMIN LOAD
>GAYMIN
>on a server-oriented Atom with <3GHz clock
>bringing up games
Never mind, I see now you're just retarded.

>>61919431
256GB is supported.

>>61919030
Not to say that Atom is good on an absolute scale, but there's a world of difference between Saltwell and Silvermont.

>>61919465
>64GB ECC RDIMMs

I'm sorry but lol

>>61919479
These are not Silvermont, these are Goldmont CPUs

>>61919030
Where do you read the IPC?

File: 1436048768676.jpg (102KB, 1089x881px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 1089x881px

>>61919443

No, next time when someone says;
>>61919034
you don't say retarded shit like;
>>61919065
>25w pfsense/firewall is a great use case

Problem solved.

File: Intel-Atom-C3955-Linux-Kernel-Compile-Benchmark.jpg (61KB, 883x566px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 883x566px

Around 50% the IPC of Broadwell-EP

File: Intel-Atom-C3955-7zip-Compression-Benchmark.jpg (57KB, 827x568px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 827x568px

>>61919568
Also dogshit integer performance, pretty good mixed and pure non vector FP perf

>>61919521
Ignore the moron, he still thinks these are the same architecture as 2008 Bonnell Atoms and in-order when Goldmont is fully out of order architecture

>>61919065
>home server

More inclined to go for a Xeon E5-2650 build. Then again of its power efficiency that's of the major goals, its certainly great.

>>61918951
The only good thing about these is the integrated 10GbE support, they're costly as fuck for mere atom chips.

Combined with a 10GbE motherboard + 2 1GbE NICs, it'll cost close to $800

>>61918951
D O A
O
A

https://itpeernetwork.intel.com/intel-atom-c3000-intelligent-edge/

>>61918951
Hadnt they stopped atom development?

>>61919186
>It's for low power servers, what you need iGPU for, goy?

JUSTnich at it again.

>>61918951
Oh, more dying Atoms soon.

>Moar korez
>no iGPU
AMD is literally dead (from laughter). Btw, when mama Su is planning to rape this abomination?

>>61921003
>Btw, when mama Su is planning to rape this abomination?
Whenever it'll get REALLY boring, boring enough to launch K12 to murder Atom.