Dooble Thread

>>61904075
I don't know much about browsers, I have heard this botnet crap about chrome, my question is, are all chromium based browsers using botnet? Is it something inherent with chromium? Or is that not the case?

I would use Dooble, except there isn't a userscript written for 4chan on it. And I don't think it has a feature like uMatrix. And I love uMatrix, so that's a problem for me. If I'm wrong, please tell me.

>>61904579
>Is it something inherent with chromium
Well, botnet, in this case, isn't really a very specific term, so I suppose it could be construed that the ``botnet" in Chromium is its forcing integration with the Google ecosystem.

As I understand it--but don't take my word for it, because I haven't found anything that shows me clear, definite proof, although I would love to see it--Chromium will download some binaries one it's installed. Or something like that. I keep searching for it online, but nothing really clear comes up.

>>61904675
>uMatrix
I'm also worried about the lack of a script blocker. Pretty much the only thing keeping me from using it. It seem like it has everything else in order.

>>61904579
I didn't even realize it was based on chromium.

>>61904793
Oh, I didn't mean dooble, not sure about that, I was mainly wondering about brave, iriduim and vivaldi.

>>61904838
Oh. I get it. You're that guy from that awful thread. Yeah, okay, so, Brave, while built on Blink, isn't really a fork of Chromium. Their business model is polarizing, and it would be in your best interest to research it.

Vivaldi is proprietary. Otter tries to do the same thing, though, but it's definitely not as good is Vivaldi.

Iridium is pretty much like UnGoogled Chromium. Just do your research.