Are there any secure digital currencies that can be transfered

>>61880680
If it's not connected to a network then how do you verify transactions and prevent someone from hacking the software to have unlimited money?

This is probably the most retarded thing I read today

>>61880723
Fpbp

buttcoin was really never designed to be anything like that, but there are memecoins that do what you describe. Regardless, fuck off to >>>/biz/ because grypto monies discussion on this board is basically spam.

>>61880743
Cryptoniggers are deluded, "infinite growth" has made them extremely sensitive to any kind of cryptocurrency criticism. It's impossible to have a discussion there.

>>61880723
By having the digital currency be issued by a trusted body and having an electronic transaction system that's secure and tested? The point is to change hard currency to a digital one without banks or relying on spoofable technology like cellular or internet (mitm attacks).

why don't you just walk down the hall and just give someone that $5 bill instead you dumbfuck

>>61880812
What if that $5 bill is fake?

>>61880807
The only reason Bitcoin requires verification is because creating "counterfeit" coins only takes a few clicks. If USD or Euros were able to be counterfeited in high quality easily with just a few pen strokes, you can be sure that the gubmints would enact similar verification procedures.

So I guess there's no digicurrency that fits the description?
I've taken a look at GNU Taler, it relies on bank transfers to get money into the system. Unlike cryptos it uses existing currencies so it's more like a middleman.
https://www.taler.net/en/

>>61880922
Euros and dollars do get counterfeited, just not to a ridiculous degree.

Actually dollars get counterfeited by nations too. North Korea is very famous, with diplomats carrying fake currency.