Why do Apple products always perform great in synthetic benc

Because you're in denial.

>>61873211
Because people mostly see the synthetic shit thanks to amateur reviews.

To be fair a lot of phones do this. Don't people always complain about samsung flagship phones being outperformed by iphones despite having like 16gb of ram and such

All the apps on the oneplus were already preloaded while the iphone had to open them fresh.

>>61873249
Didn't look that way.

File: 1486835945867.jpg (274KB, 1000x710px) Image search: [Google]

274KB, 1000x710px

>>61873249
>video clearly shows him opening up recent apps and force closing everything on both phones
>iToddler mentally blocks out reality

>>61873211
It's like me in college

I ended up not practicing and training to learn the material, but training myself to be better and better at taking tests

>>61873243
You could have an equivalent of a high-end gaymen desktop in a phone running on Android and it would still get BTFO by an iPhone. I have never seen such a bloated mess of an OS. It doesn't matter how much "horse power" you have, the end-user experience is going to be trash if the software can't properly utilize it.

>>61873211
>absolutely destroyed
>0.5 sec

There's a lot of variables in there. different OS, Hardware, input detection, ui latency etc

synthetics remove most of the variables just test the actual hardware

>>61873311
(You)

>>61873274
>a video can't be faked

I bet you also believe all these Nazi gas chamber "footage" from the Americans

>>61873328
>the state of mactoddlerism

>>61873211
Cause synthetic benchmarks measure the CPU and/or GPU performance while these tests just measure read speeds?

>>61873385
I thought iphones were supposed to have 5X faster read speeds, why are they still slower?

>>61873402
Who knows?
It's a shame it's not a thing that's commonly benchmarked.

>>61873385
>>61873402
>>61873452
>""""""faster""""""" cpu and gpu
>actually faster storage
>still ends up being slower than a $300 chinese phone

iToddlers will defend this.

File: 1474262831554.webm (1MB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 640x360px

>>61873328
>an objective test has shown my fruit religion in a negative light, it must be fake!!!111

The absolute state of iToddlerism.

>>61873508
I'd wager iToddlers aren't even aware of it, to be honest.