Welcome to the botnet.

File: 1478288849662.jpg (54KB, 396x382px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 396x382px

>>61871762

I don't care if I'm on a botnet, I have nothing to hide.

>>61872066
credit card info pls
access to all your pics pls
access to all your social media pls
phone numbers of all your friends pls

>>61872066
>I don't care if I'm on a botnet, I have nothing to hide.

I hope you're joking

>>61872066
https://www.wired.com/2013/06/why-i-have-nothing-to-hide-is-the-wrong-way-to-think-about-surveillance/

>>61872066
It's not that you don't think you have anything to hide. It's if THEY think you have something to hide. How many times have we heard stories of people having photos developed, and suddenly they get the cops called on them because of child porn -- only to find out that it was simply a picture of their baby getting bathed for the first time. And it's clear from looking at the photo that it was innocent, except to the stick-up-the-ass photo warrior (sjw?) at the photo lab who was convinced that something needed to be done to save the baby!

In the future, it will be someone, somewhere, behind several layers of botnet ... maybe the wonderful diversity people at Google, perhaps ... that will have their AI detect (by parameters the SJWs have defined) "inappropriate" material on your machine. And maybe they won't call the authorities; maybe they will simply delete your files. (Similar case with a musician who uploaded his own song to iCloud, only to find it deleted by Apple who claimed a DMCA was filed ... against the artist's own song!)

They will delete your photos; they will delete your animu; they will delete your reaction pics; they will delete your text files. Once you allow the means of access, next comes the thought police. You have been warned.

>>61871762
>lists a bunch of optional features
>there is nothing you can do
Ok

>>61872137
Good read, thanks