Is Unity pajeet tier for game development?

>>61862092
Yes

If you dont put my retarded arbitrary restrictions on yourself you are a pajeet

>>61862092
yes

Usually when a game is made using Unity, it is good to steer clear from it.

>>61862092
No. Unity is a fine engine and can produce great things
since it has a freeware version that always shows the Unity splash, people associate it with low-skill low-budget garbage.
Hearthstone was made in Unity, and no one thinks it's shit because of that

If you care about your freedom then use Godot

the vastly white blizzard uses Unity in Hearthstone

>>61862257
>can produce great things
>unoptimized engine producing unoptimized games is a good thing
Retard

At the beginning it was a nice engine with nice API for nice games, which did not need AAA graphics. I used it many times to create creative games.
Then they bloated it so much it cannot be normally used anymore and has graphics still worse than Unreal.

>>61862305
Elaborate

>>61862092
I don't think it's pajeet tier. Unity is not made for large projects.

Maybe it's the hipster tier. You can be a """indie creative game dev""" and code all your game in a Starbucks with Unity.

It's a great prototyping tool tho. And it's cool for game jams.

>>61862092
Not really. It's just the Wordpress of game engines, aka extended beyond its original scope.
If you want that, you might as well use Godot as soon as v3 is there.

>>61864463
Not him but Godot, is free and opensource, released under the MIT licence.

File: c1.png (464KB, 960x540px) Image search: [Google]

464KB, 960x540px

>>61862092
No.

Unity is itself not that bad. It is too easy to find shitty tutorials and guides. And so many shitty games are made with it. I suppose that makes it pajeet tier.

Unity graphics is ugly and makes everything look like plastic.

unity is greatest of all time because it allows the japanese to make more pervert games more quickly

>>61862257
Fuck off jim

I stay with ue4. Its actually professional software and open source