Explain to me why this browser is a meme? >not sjw (Firef

>>61858801
Very, very far behind in features and insecure. Exploitable, too.

I used the linux version for 15 minutes and felt it was slow as fuck. Like, miserably slow even compared to Firefox.

I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you’re referring to as Botnet, is in fact, SJW/Botnet or as I’ve recently taken to calling it, SJW plus Botnet.

It's Firefox for people people stuck in 2004.

>it's not old, it's "classic"

Not going to even entertain the notion that waterfox is better.
It is compiled with the (((Intel))) C compiler

>>61858829
How is it exploitable. Many parts of the browser are regularly updated with newer FF source code.

>>61858801
I am in search for a new browser atm and I give every browser a chance (apart from botnet shit) using PaleMoon atm, you can make it look good with a click but damn its much slower than firefox or chrome not like 0.1 but images take like 1-2sec to load sometimes fucking unacceptable. I would use Opera its pretty ok but its horrendous bookmark option is just horrible. you only have a bookmark bar and if you actually have any sorted bookmarks it takes like 3 clicks to get to them and they this fucking bookmark sidebar is fucking shit tier. I don't understand how you would ever make bookmarks not 1 MAX 2 click via a simple icon like firefox or chrome does.

>>61859268
OP here. Yes I've noticed the speed is not up to par with others, but I think I'm willing to stick with it now at least until I find a browser that isn't SJW that actually works.
I don't use bookmark sidebars on any browser so can't comment there. I use the bookmark toolbar place right of the search/domain bar.

theres one major problem with it

It's painfully slow compared to chrome, ff nightly or brave

>>61859326
>brave
stop shilling this piece of ass

>>61858861
That's a RoTT-tier argument, it means nothing in an age where everything is compiled and/or assembled.

>>61858852
> implying shitty interfaces are a step forward

>>61858801
>Explain to me why this browser is a meme?
because the developer is a furry
other than that the browser is pretty good
By default it has more security settings on and it's free of google analytics

File: brave.jpg (58KB, 700x400px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 700x400px

>>61859343
BE BRAVER FAGGOT!!

>>61859343
I'm not, actually its a piece of shit. A fast piece of shit compared to pale moon mind you but still shit nonetheless.

>>61858829
sadly true

I used it 2 years ago. But, some features that websites needed were missing. Is it better now?

File: brave-volley.jpg (9KB, 266x189px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 266x189px

>>61859373
>just install brave guys

>>>/v/

>>61858829
>>61859399
it is not true you literal faggots go fuck back to mozilla

>>61859326
noticed, you said ff and nightly, but not ff beta. why?
how often does nightly crash?

>>61859438
>implying they arent chrome botnet users

>>61858849
A hidden gem kind of post

>>61859411
>pais platform
>ZERO FF add-on support

kys shll

>>61859457
Been using it for 2 days, not a single crash so far. I didn't use firefox before so I can't compare.

>>61858801
I heard it's made by literal FURRIES.

>>61859473
chromos don't fear the moon, it's the mozillafags that can't stand the success of a fork while they're hemorrhaging.

>>61859507
the founder (moonchild) is, the rest are just autistic assholes. however, unlike 99% of /g/, they actually know what they're doing.

>>61859507
Furries >>> FBI >>> SJW

>>61859605
furry ok uninstalled that shit are there no mentaly healthy people in programming ?

>>61859706
>>61859641

>>61859706
>mentally healthy people
>in an industry that revolves entirely around looking at a screen for the entire day trying to get a bunch of binary switches to suck your dick
???

>look everyone we compiled firefox with gentoo ricer CFLAGS and called it something else, everyone please use it
lel

>>61859841
>i think this is all it take to make a fork
lel

>>61858801
slower an more bloated than ff 57+ and chromium. also "muh sjw" is not an argument when discussing software quality, believe it or not

>>61859706

>are there no mentaly healthy people in programming ?

considering a manchild compared a cushy desk job to a gulag no we don't

>>61859936
well technically it is

File: catboner.jpg (11KB, 212x237px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 212x237px

>>61859373
Turn on brave and it runs about 6 seperate processes and uses over a gig of ram with no pages opened.

No support for Tree Style Tabs.

>>61858801
>okay addon support
you mean literally no addon support at all?
You can't even use iMacros on that shit.

>>61860293
It is when the devs waste time removing every instance of "slave" from the source code.

>>61860481

seems to run just fine, slave or no slave

you're getting triggered over a word, who is the SJW now?

>>61860481
they could be jerking off 99% of the time instead of working on the browser for all I care
also I'm fairly sure they leave the search and replace work to shitty interns who would be otherwise useless