>testing a low quality game on a 16 core CPU >Linus shill

>>61847275
Is AMD trying to sell TR to the gaymen crowd?
Seems like Nvidia is even saying to buy TR for gaming.
Is this just a way to extract money from stupid people?

>>61847275
Prepare yourself for EPYC vs Xeon gaymen benchmarks.

File: AMD_Threadripper_1950X_review_Better_than_Intel_in_almost_every_way_Ars_Technica_UK_-_2017-08-11_11.09.19.png (77KB, 795x601px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 795x601px

When 4K gaming is a thing processor performance will become less of a thing and more about price and features than clocks.

>>61847275
>"Oi vey don't test any scenario's in which AMD does not come out on top!"

File: 1488932092157.jpg (68KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 400x400px

It a known fact that source games were highly optimised for intel CPUs

File: 5.jpg (72KB, 1267x637px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 1267x637px

And here we have some benchmarks from AMD themselves

>>61847275
> anyone who spends money on a 8+ core CPU for gaming is a fucking moron.
Bought FX-8350 in 2013. No regrets.

File: 1310429820535.jpg (13KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 300x300px

>>61847275
>people buying a 16c/32t cpu to play CSGO
>yfw this will actualy happen

>>61848041
...until GPUs are fast enough to crunch through 4K and then the bottleneck becomes the CPU.

>>61848157
Don't even try it, they won't understand

>>61848139
>t. Mr. Poor

>>61848178
That's ironic coming from an AMDtard

>>61848099
That's because 8 FX cores is equivalent AT BEST to 4 Zen cores.

>>61848213
> AT BEST
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WFoC3TR5rzI

>>61847275
>low quality
Or just very popular.....?

>>61848157
>e
Today the common bottleneck isn't the GPU. Still get a lot of use out of my old (Intel® Core™2 Duo Processor E7400) that is still going strong.

GPU/Shader pipeline is more of a bottleneck with most modern games.

>>61847275
He's a Jew mate. What did you expect.

He is (((PAID))) to push out intel sponsered content all the time.

>>61847275
Because his audience wants to see that shit... Also he benchmarks gayming at 4K while testing the CPU, then acts surprised when even a Ryzen 3 1300 gets the same framerate...

File: asdsads.png (310KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

310KB, 400x400px

>>61848041
AMD BTFO
INTEL BEATING THEM GOOD

File: linus_fanbase.jpg (79KB, 812x621px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 812x621px

>>61850065
>his audience

>>61849606
there is no point in testing a game like csgo on any >4 core cpu , as the engine is unable to utilize em and clockspeed wins , simple as that

>>61849660
That was my point.

File: 1476607773112.png (80KB, 500x421px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 500x421px

>>61850122
>These same kids are also on /g/

File: amdfag.jpg (3MB, 8624x3896px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 8624x3896px

>>61850122
>linus and amdfags.jpg

>>61850081
>1 fps faster on maximums
>7900X 5 fps behind 1950X on 99 percentile
suuuure

>>61850122
Is Linus a pedophile?

File: average nvidiot.jpg (865KB, 5312x2988px) Image search: [Google]

865KB, 5312x2988px

>>61852213

>>61847832
Look at all tr gaymer led mobos

>>61850684
Both CPUs are bollocks for this test.
Intel will win due clocks/IPC/latency. For a mixed usage Intel still better, but if someone is using PC just for gsyming grab a 7700k or coffee lake. Amd is somewhat okay, if you don't want 144hz.

>>61850684
yeah but how would people know how these cpu perform with this very popular game ?

>>61848139
I expect maybe pro players to do it, who knows.

>>61847275
Funny thing is, if you stream while playing that game TR pulls ahead.

File: 1498966262127.png (37KB, 1109x582px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 1109x582px

>>61847832
There's gonna be dum-dumbs showing off their sick thread ripper gaming PCs soon enough.

>>61852213
You post this as a joke, but I still wanna go beat the shit out of this kid's brother

>>61847275
Lol, my old i5 easily beats your shitty threadripper.

File: intel ceo JUST.jpg (119KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 1000x1000px

>>61853141
Back to work, Brian.

>>61852379
Without a doubt.

File: 1487789493624.jpg (156KB, 633x758px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 633x758px

>>61847275

DELET DIS

File: 1502378233499.jpg (65KB, 1242x778px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 1242x778px

>>61853245
AMD BTFO

File: amdloo.png (316KB, 882x758px) Image search: [Google]

316KB, 882x758px

>>61853261

>2 fps different

at what settings?

The cheap intel, 7700K BTFO high-end intel and Ayyymd.

I like to see what 8700k can do.

AMDrones would consider suicide.

File: intelshit.jpg (143KB, 2179x226px) Image search: [Google]

143KB, 2179x226px

>>61853312
what out for those frame dips its a doozy

File: 1463434655833.png (42KB, 653x726px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 653x726px

>>61853475

what game?

>>61853491

savage.

>>61853312
Pages and pages of autistic anti-AMD screeching. https://rbt.asia/g/search/filename/amdloo.png/

>>61853312
>I like to see what 8700k can do.
You mean "I'd like to see", you fucking vacuous shitstain? 8700K is going to be X299 part two. Rushed, housefire abortion with insane clockspeeds and TDP that could be best described as a mild suggestion.

>>61853491
It's obviously a Digital Foundry video. Spoilers: i5 loses, you wojak spamming failure. http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2017-ryzen-5-1600-1600x-vs-core-i5-7500k-review

>>61847275
woah