Is the errata sheet for AMD Ryzen publicly available somewhere?

>>61822164
No, and it likely won't (unless you're big money) be until AMD documents all the errata even they likely don't know about.

>>61822211
>No, and it likely won't (unless you're big money)
That's a shitty move, even Intel being as jewish as they are have public errata sheets

>>61822304
Public errata sheets for an architecture that's been used for the last 7 years, it's well documented.

>>61822317
I thought the errata sheets were per processor generation?

e.g.
https://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/specification-updates/7th-gen-core-family-spec-update.pdf

https://www3.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/specification-updates/desktop-6th-gen-core-family-spec-update.pdf

>>61822346
Starting with Sandybridge, they're basically the same shit.