>A mobile CPU is better than 600 dollar ryzen JUST

>>61787529
>this is what intel shilling is reduced to

lel

>>61787529
>post datasheet
>>hurf durf this is better
Thank you for your input.

Do you even know how TDP limits work?

wow op
this is a really bad thread
like, really genuinely awful
you should go somewhere else

Oy vey. Intel processors are battle tested.

>>61787529
>i7 cpu
>really just a shitty downclocked dual core
This needs to stop

how dare you all treat a member of god's chosen race with such disrespect. can't you schmoes just admit that 4 of intel's fantastic threads are better than anybody elses 16?

>people can't accept a 15W CPU for 400 dollars beats $600,99+tax ryzen

>>61787529
You know a spec sheet isn't a benchmark, right?

File: intel battle tested.png (87KB, 927x527px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 927x527px

>>61787584
sure are

how can I install windows 7 on this?

>>61787529
>>61788339
Yeah, there's a reason it beats the $600 Ryzen CPU. There is no Ryzen CPU at that price point, so I guess it wins by default.

But just for shits and giggles, let's compare it to a $300 Ryzen CPU that's currently in a laptop made by ASUS.

http://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i7-7660U-vs-AMD-Ryzen-7-1700/m274151vs3917

http://www.pcworld.com/article/3199028/computers/asus-debuts-the-first-ever-ryzen-laptop-with-a-mobile-radeon-surprise-too.html