Give me one reason why this isnt the greatest media player ever made.
>rebuilding font cache
It's glitchy.
>>61736466
/thread
>>61736457
The shills literally /can't/
>>61736457
its not mpv
>>61736473
glitchy
very fucking glitchy
It isn't as good as MPV or it's various forks or MPC-HC. It does literally nothing better, so it can't be the greatest.
>>61736457
There is none. It is the greatest media player ever made.
Gnu-linuxtards can't use it on their shitty os. :^)
>>61736470
>>61736486
Works on my machine.
Its stupid logo.
>>61736495
>MPC-HC
Deprecated software. Not an argument.
>>61736457
while it supports lots of platforms, it's not especially optimized for any (in particular hardware acceleration or assembly optimization).
it's really meant to ubiquitous and versatile (as seen by the number of platforms, file formats, protocols, and codecs supported), not lean and fast. it's good (but not great) for general purpose use.
it does have an awful logo though
>>61736457
install mpv
>>61737103
Literally art
VLC wins again
>>61736457
This is not a media player but a deployment ration in the new grounds, made to be delivered with parachutes.
As it don't depend on external codecs etc.., you can just build it whole in any sort of new OS or CPU architecture.
It's what you have until the reinforcements come.
>>61736457
>>61736457
>Being able to play one song after another without having to create playlists/folders
SM player exists
SVP is the greatest thing ever. If it supports VLC then you're partly right
>>61736860
He literally said forks you neanderthal.
Here's one reason: play a video back on vlc, screencap, play the same video on any other media player, screencap, then revel in how fucking washed out vlc is.
Also the scaling algorithm is not configurable and looks like pixel AIDS.
>>61737198
>SVP is the greatest thing ever.
Disgusting
Anyways, mpv supports it.
>>61737241
>>61737308
Not him, but what is wrong with SVP? I'd rather watch things with it on than without it. It needs decent hardware but it works pretty good for what it is
>>61737359
Prone to creating nasty artifacts
>>61736466
I've never seen this happen
>>61737103
This however does get irritating
>>61737427
Maybe 2-3 times during a span of a movie, on weak hardware it probably would be more frequent, but I never found it that distracting to turn if off unless what I'm watching has a variable framerate because people can't rip shit right
>>61736457
mpv exists