REEEE WHY THE FUCK DOES THIS TAKE SO LONG TO LAUNCH THE FUCK

File: nightly.png (30KB, 1200x627px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 1200x627px

nightly doesn't have this problem

I'm using Vivaldi right now and having no launch time issues. What addons you got running? I'm using Ghostery, uBlock, Bunch of greasemonkey scripts, JS switch, WebRTC protect.

Maybe we can get to the bottom of your problem?

>>61732820
Just use firefox now that it's good again

>>61732851
Not OP. Had only uBlock and it took significantly longer to launch compared to Chromium. That's the only reason I do not use it, otherwise it's comfy.

File: Screenshot_436.png (57KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 1920x1080px

>>61732832
stop using the old logo

>I'm using a single core amd chip from 2005, why is opening 24 YouTube tabs on autoresume making it slow?? ;(

>>61732967
Wow, looks great

>>61732967
I don't have this logo, and I'm in Nightly rn

>"worse than firefox"
>he hasn't tried Nightly

>vivaldi license: proprietary + (((freeware)))
>blink engine ie chrome clone

>>>/v/

>>61732967
Is this real?
Looks comfy.

BUTANE-FOX

>>61732967
How do I get this? Please teach me your ways anon

>>61732832
fpbp
OP is botnet enabler.

takes a little less than 2 seconds i forget if thats slow or not but you know made me become aware of it and i dont like it

>he doesnt use ungoogled chromium
freedom is at the reach of your cursor

>>61732967
SAUCEEE

>>61733990
>he uses a school software project which relys entirely on a botner ridden browser

Have you even checkout of the projects commits?

>>61732832
>>61732967
>using firefox
>in 2017
I seriously hope you fucks don't do this. Literally using windows 10 tier.

>>61734002
I think it's a shoop.
Not half bad, I'll admit!

>>61732967
I don't like the tabs, will they fix them for the stable version?

>>61734040
If the Tor project and Gnu IceCat use it as a base I think it will suit my needs just fine.

What do you use by chance?
What are your reasonings for the hate?
In my experience it's generally windows users who are actually throwing shade on FF without a proper argument.

File: Vivaldi Bait.png (75KB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 2560x1440px

>>61732820

>>61734053
It's un-wasted space now..

What's not to like?
No more clicking right on that curve or behind the tabs by accident.

File: Screenshot_2017-08-04_20-54-26.png (86KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 1920x1080px

>>61732967
>>61734002
>>61734048

hes right fresh install of nightly

>>61732820
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vivaldi_browser

>License Proprietary

This has to be bait...

All freetards can go eat shit.

>>61734124
That's awesome!

I hope it stays on nightly so we can distinguish between stable.

I'm a fan.

File: comfy-stallman.jpg (15KB, 340x180px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 340x180px

>>61734148
This is a /g/nu board
>>>/v/

File: QEPrv.jpg (70KB, 680x451px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 680x451px

>>61734080
>throwing shade
BTW, listing 2 failed projects isn't a proper argument either. You know that though you're just playing dumb. Enjoy firefox w/ botnet built in. I'm lovin it™

File: google.chrome.png (126KB, 1045x580px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 1045x580px

>>61734210
>"failed projects"
still in development
>botnet
citation needed

The fact that these projects can be built proves it's not a botnet.
Everything is in the source and can be rebuilt without components or forked.

Everything is optional and the purpose stated and you are presented with that information on install.

They don't attempt to hide spying features like chromium does.

What browser are you using that isn't a "botnet" btw?

>>61734162
The logo of Nightly has always been different than stable dummy anon

>>61734319
Not him but are all of these things proved?

>>61732851
>ghostery
Nice botnet, anon.

>>61732851
http://betteradvertising.com

Is Waterfox /g/ approved?

>>61732820
It's collecting your data and sending it to the botnet. Give it some time

If I switch browsers to some other variant of firefox can I easily move my browsing history/cookies over? I don't want to start from scratch again, it's very bothersome.

>>61732851
They are bunch of faggots you lack dosh for some proper hardware.

>>61737667
Yes, just start the new firefox version and it'll open your default profile (except developer edition, that defaults to a new profile). You can also start firefox with -p to get a profile manager and picker. But once you go v57, you can't downgrade your profile anymore. There are breaking history/bookmark db changes.

>>61732872
>it took significantly longer to launch compared to Chromium. That's the only reason I do not use it
How often are you starting it to make that a big deal? A long start up time isn't a big deal if you keep it open for a while.

>>61734053
Yeah they confirmed they would fix it and add more animations.
https://dolske.wordpress.com/

>everything I don't like is a botnet

>>61732820
For the last 3 builds (I think) I can't reply on 4chan anymore, only the Reply at the top works.
I'm on Ubuntu Gnome, anymore with this problem?