BTRFS IS OFFICIALLY DEAD

>>61729325
So ZFS won?

>>61729325
Old news, dumb frogposter.

i still use the good old ext4 so i dont care but how its dead when RHEL/CentOS drop it, its not the only distro on the world

>>61729325
Suse still support it.

File: 1501773653701.jpg (117KB, 750x911px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 750x911px

>>61729325
Who uses RedLennart Linux anyway? The fuckers gave us the retarded interface naming because eth0 was deemed racist.

btrfs has been deprecated in RHEL but SUSE still uses it and is actively developing it.

>>61729480
https://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=150160776028329&w=2
Oracle aswell. In this case patching up the remaining flaws of the "RAID5" mode.

>>61729325
I'm using it my linux. Should I consider to go back to ext4?
It's kinda a pain in the to format my drive, but it's my main pc so I guess I will do it if it's worth it in a long run.

>>61729325
On HN someone said this is because Oracle took CentOS and made it into their own product, so Redhat discontinued btrfs in order to hurt them. Anyone know the story?

>>61729747
Xfs for single drives or mdadm configuration. ZFS for archival.

>>61729875
>XFS
Enjoy your partition disappearance after a hard reset.
>>61729747
Stick with ext4. That shit is borderline dark magic when it comes to performance and reliability. You don't need and you don't want XFS on home systems.

>>61729461
>eth0 racist
Wat..?

>>61729325
More like BTFOFS :^)

File: cotton-picking-negro.jpg (232KB, 938x969px) Image search: [Google]

232KB, 938x969px

>>61729461
WTF? How is eth0 racist?

>>61729875
I thought that xfs is dangerous if you ever hard reset like for example a power outage without ups?

Let me remind you, btrfs scrub of death it real, I lost some data because of it. Non raid. Single drive.

DO NOT USE BTRFS EXCEPT FOR TESTING IT.

DO NOT USE IT WITH ANY VALUABLE DATA.

>>61729325
bcachefs will be the fs of the future.

>>61729747
No. This is typical Red Hat doing business and try to hinder their competitors offerings, as they've always done.

>>61729924
>Enjoy your partition disappearance after a hard reset.
Nice meme.

>>61729461
Wait wut?

File: 05f592866019d48b011c367f1aee966f.jpg (77KB, 1136x640px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 1136x640px

>using Red hat products
>using systemd

>>61731446
Fuck, Skelly is getting thicc

File: Opensuse-logo_type-wog.sh-600x600.png (76KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 600x600px

>>61729325
No it's not. Only Red hat backports are. It's still developed by Suse

>>61729325
and?

>>61729939
>>61730055
>>61731249
It's fake.

I use btrfs with void and nothing has ever gone wrong

All the fearmongering around btrfs is a spook

I switch off my computer by cutting off power. Ext4 works fine for me.

>HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
I don't understand.
Why is this funny? It's not like anybody even used it.

>>61732795
>All the fearmongering around btrfs is a spook
Except it isn't, and there has been many a mailing list to have a chuckle at.

>>61729461
Sauce??