how will intel even compete? https://www.amazon.com/gp/new-r

File: 1489100922662.png (246KB, 882x758px) Image search: [Google]

246KB, 882x758px

>>61723518
DELEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEET

Every fucking Intel cpu I see on that list is 3.5 stars . I didn't realize quite how fucked Intel currently is

The whole kabylake-x line-up is shit

They still hold the best gaming cpu's with the skylake/kabylake i7's though

It will be interesting to see what Cannonlake will do

File: 006_image.jpg (33KB, 251x251px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 251x251px

>play a game
>put the fire out

did they even know what they were making?

>play a game
>it's eve online
oh wow it can play my space spreadsheet simulator where I pretend to be a jewish scammer who just had his NAP violated

>>61724841
Intel is subliminally still dreaming of that ancap society where they could legally murder their competitors and scam consumers.

>>61724705
1600 is literally tied with 7700k
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UfNMn7RWgLw&t=256s
costing less
with less tdp
there is absolutely zero reason to buy intel for the next 2-3 years

File: t-bird.jpg (370KB, 1165x1168px) Image search: [Google]

370KB, 1165x1168px

seems not too many at Intel bothered to remember their nightmare that was Thunderbird
>new Intel chips certainly cant run hotter than their Pentium 4....

>>61724705
>They still hold the best gaming cpu's with the skylake/kabylake i7's though
Sure if all you care about is playing CS-GO at 500fps at 640x480 then kabylake is great.

File: ddda.png (35KB, 362x435px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 362x435px

>>61723518
rush another Refreshlake on a new Socket

File: kekekekek.png (1023KB, 728x1232px) Image search: [Google]

1023KB, 728x1232px

>>61724705
>The whole kabylake-x line-up is shit

WHAT DID YOU SAY, GOYIM?

File: stateofintel.png (458KB, 615x450px) Image search: [Google]

458KB, 615x450px

>>61725160
OY GEVALT!
DELID THIS! YOU HAVE TO TEST IT ON 480P LOW SETTINGS

>>61725160
>1600 is literally tied with 7700k
>this is what AMDrones actually believe

File: Bomb has been delid.jpg (43KB, 679x367px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 679x367px

>>61726205

File: aaaaa.png (36KB, 377x432px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 377x432px

>>61726129
update!

>>61726358
I know that this is some form of launch craze, but still, pretty EBYN

File: 1470962064089.jpg (48KB, 500x380px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 500x380px

>>61723518
caught me off guard

>>61726205
https://www.notebookcheck.net/Ryzen-5-1400-and-1600-Review.225218.0.html

The i7 7700K is still better in single core workloads, but loses if all cores can be used.

Cincench R15:
Single core: 194 vs 148 (+31% for the i7)
Multi core: 984 vs 1143 (+16% for the R5)

File: 1501757011554.png (162KB, 633x900px) Image search: [Google]

162KB, 633x900px

>>61723518

>>61726635
That's not even a fair comparison anyway, because the i7 7700K is 100 dollars more expensive. Also the board for the i7 is more expensive.

>>61726205
30 games tested
half wins on amd
half wins on intel

literally the same shit

>>61723518
>ref=
Yeah, no

>>61727804
well 1800x launched
amd compared it to 6900k literally destroying it
shills constantly tried to compare it with 7700k

i guess its time to return the favor
a cpu that costs less
has less tdp
and 2 more cores
literally destroys the sole reason 7700k exists

>>61727804
Ryzen 5 1400 is $160
7700K is $320
Based on PC part picker. That's twice as much.

>>61727859
He's comparing R5 1600. That's about 200 bucks.

>>61723518
>raven doing oribtal bombardment

Buying X299 will bring Dust back??