http://www.anandtech.com/show/11688 /toshiba-announces-bg3-l

>512GB of storage
maybe because im not poor and have 2TB of storage

>>61709852
because 250GB is enough.

>>61709852
Because
>It's not out Yet
>Because it has no Price
>Because this SSD is going to be mainly for OEM

I have a simple ultrabook with 22gb SSD 520mbps and a 750gb HDD.
With Debians "/" and 2gb of swap in ssd, and in the hdd Debians "/home" with 500gb and windows 10 with 250gb

>>61709852
>Those traces
Has the PCB been laid out using tape??

>>61709852
Because I have a 256 GB 840 Pro and 500 GB 850 Evo. Only SATA though.

>>61709852
because I got 960GB of SSD storage.

>>61711397
Do you even high speed electronics?

Because NVME is not suited for desktop use.

>>61709852
Fuck, you got me.
I only have an 850 Evo 500GB and a Sandisk Extreme Pro 480GB

I'm poor

File: tape.jpg (219KB, 1600x900px) Image search: [Google]

219KB, 1600x900px

>>61709852
I do have a few TB of storage.

A bunch of these 330TB tapes would be nice though. THAT is what I wished I had.

>>61711647
dum

>>61711647
Please explain, this is the first time I've heard that

>>61711481
> Only SATA though.
But when is that ever not fast enough for /g/ shit?

>>61711689
>30 MBPS write speed

>>61711778
Who are you quoting, senpai?

>>61711792
your shitty tape drivers are slow and useless. it would take a year to fill up half of them.

>>61711778
It's faster than that, I'm pretty sure.

But I'd certainly love even 30MB/s if the drive and tapes were quite affordable (Maybe ~$1k for a drive + $50-100 a tape? Absolute pipe dream, I know.).

Yea, it's not like I need faster SSD or faster RAM or whatever. But bulk storage like this is what I don't currently have.

>>61711827
LTO7 is 750MB/s you stupid negroidal shit.
kill yourself

>>61711827
Heh. LTO-7 already writes at 1100 MB/s.

File: 1465919544758.jpg (29KB, 543x533px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 543x533px

>>61711853
>>61711870
>theoretical rates
>not even half of that irl

>>61711884
Sure, I'm hyped for the storage density and data transfer rates that can be achieved, but the 360MB/s or whatever it is now models seem to be what's currently economically viable. Is that not fast enough for your cool shit?

330TB tapes obviously also aren't on the market yet. I also want these, but it's not that I get them.

>>61709852
Because I already have a 1TB SSD and 20TB worth of HDD space on my server.

>>61711979
but 220TB are.
Imagine all these dick pics archived forever...

>>61711763
if it doesn't win in benchmarks it's ABSOLUTELY WORTHLESS by /g/ standards and any owners of such hardware should just kill themselves or switch to <other brand> or upgrade the fastest.

>>61709852
It's to small and slow compared to my 1TB 960 Pro

>>61713683
I guess I'd also be happy with 220TB. Ah, why isn't every household hoarding dick pics?!

>>61713752
I guess so. Not that I mind striving for better technology, but this kind of storage already has more performance than applications require.

>>61709852
Because I have 7.5TB of storage.

>>61709852
>That size
>NVMe

Shit will throttle the fuck out or will need to be connected to the heatsink.

>>61711884
Haven't seen vapeman in a while

Is he still a meme?

File: 36.jpg (137KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 500x500px

>>61715238
Yes.

>>61711778
my sata3 laptop harddisk is actually 30mb write. sad