Firefox 57

i like this new feature where non of my addons work. makes the browser 10x faster.

LEGACY

Telemetry

File: 2017-08-03 04_12_41.jpg (45KB, 411x520px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 411x520px

>>61702639
>>61702634
what kind of addons are you using?
>open with
dev confirmed webextension update
>umatrix/ublock
same
>exhentai
now i'll have to manually edit the cookie, oh no

basically
>works on my machine

>>61702686
>he has to use an addon to be able to access sadpanda
kek look at this loser

Developer>Nightly

>>61702686
findbar tweak

File: Screenshot from 03-08-2017 04:24:05.png (166KB, 1678x744px) Image search: [Google]

166KB, 1678x744px

Every one of these has to work or nothing for me.
I can deal without textlinks, but everything else is critical.

>>61702837
greasemonkey and self destructing cookies have replacements, ublock/umatrix will get an update.
the rest will probably be gone. your best bet is waterfox or some other fork that will stay on esr. but i wouldn't get my hopes up, eventually it will all be gone.

i had like 20 add ons installed, most of which have no alternative.

>>61702906
>greasemonkey and self destructing cookies have replacements,

Which are?

>>61702991
https://tampermonkey.net/
https://github.com/mrdokenny/Cookie-AutoDelete

install vivaldi

>>61703117
more like vivirus

>>61702686
>being too retarded to just log in to sadpanda
what the fuck is wrong with you

>>61702625
https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/nightly/all/

>>61703039
>tampermonkey
How good is that vs Greasemonkey?

>>61703774
It's probably missing some features, but it runs scripts, that's all I need it to do.

File: 1486957189791.png (75KB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 2560x1440px

>>61703117

>>61702748

epic

>>61702686
TreeStyleTabs

>>61703039
>tampermonkey
Proprietary garbage, use Violentmonkey

>>61702625
This is all I use at work

>be me
>work in a corporation
>multiple locations
>all controlled by lanspan
>noone is admin except it
>we got Chrome and ie
>ie sucks hard especially with bromium
>Chrome is there but it fags fixed the registry so it only uses one site
>enter firefox portable nightly.
>1 64 bit DLL for flash and I can play all the YouTube I want
>no admin right required
>holà would jump over web filter until they moved to checkpoint.

>>61702837
you can fake your user agent with uMatrix though I don't know if it works as well as a dedicated extension

>>61702686

>So stupid he can't delete a cookie when he fucks up getting into exhentai

Yeah, I'll disregard anything you have to say.

Does treestyle tabs still work?

>>61702686
>undo close tab
ctrl+shift+t

>>61702748
bretty much

About fucking time they focus on making the browser usable again. We're getting there.

Replacements for these?
Session Manager
Tab Groups
Classic Theme Restorer
Grab and Drag
Stylish
Scroll Progress

>>61706672
A therapist

>>61706692
What do you mean?

>>61702625
lol, bullshit.

the only reason I even launch firefox anymore was for Downthemall! and tab groups.

File: 1499034304249.jpg (287KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

287KB, 1080x1920px

>>61706672
>>61706692
>>61706698
i lol'd

>>61702686
>Undo close tab
Am I being trolled?
Is this the new "reddit tabs on browser screenshot" meme?

>>61706672
Pale Moon

>>61706692
kek

>>61706672
>Session Manager
The basic save and restore functionality is possible with webextensions but I don't know if there's a replacement right now.
>Tab Groups
The api required to make it got approved a few days ago and there's several new addons that will probably implement it.
>Classic Theme Restorer
Depends on what you use it for.
>Stylish
The Chrome version works.
>Scroll Progress
I couldn't find an addon with that name but showing a number in the corner of the screen is possible.

There's still more than 3 months left for mozilla to implement additional apis and for addon developers to create replacements.

File: Screenshot_2017-08-03-01-24-26.jpg (129KB, 1440x674px) Image search: [Google]

129KB, 1440x674px

Of course it runs the fastest

Lel

2ez

>>61707099
>Depends on what you use it for.
To move some UI elements around.
>The Chrome version works.
Chrome version doesn't style UI, I'm using stylish to style FF's UI.

>>61707194
userChrome.css isn't going anywhere and I'm sure some kind of an easier interface will be available later.

>>61707218
Stylish is much more convenient than userChrome.css.

>>61707245
>and I'm sure some kind of an easier interface will be available later

>>61707247
Aren't web-extensions specifically banned from changing the UI?

I need ublock and noscript to work, otherwise no deal.

I only need uBlock Origin. I know you need uMatrix too but I simply don't care about tracking any more.

>>61707301
they will both work

>>61707298
Don't know if you got the memo but Firefox will have addon apis that Chrome doesn't have.
They have tracking bugs for several addons. E.g. noscript >>61707301 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1214733

>>61702748
wasn't the original comic portraying IceFrog and DotA?

>>61707341
It was.

>>61707301
>>61707336

Did chrome ever developed a plugin like noscript?

So what's the difference between this and regular firefox? In layman's terms please.

so which is the last version i can update to before turning off the ability to update? 56?

>>61707563
Nightly is made with the latest code and a release comes out every day.
Three months later, once the features are stabilized and any potential bugs are removed, that code reaches Firefox Stable.

>>61707604
Cheers cobbah

>>61707114
>NIG
>NOG

>>61707405
noscript is completely incompatible with chrome because of the way it works.

>>61707584
Yes, 56. Or you could get 52 ESR.

>>61707844
not unless firefox opens another api for georgio

File: addons.png (262KB, 899x947px) Image search: [Google]

262KB, 899x947px

just fuck my shit up, mozilla

>>61702625
I tried using nightly for a few months but it kept breaking everything all the time so I was forced to switch back to stable

>>61708324
switch to esr instead.

>>61702625
I prefer dev edition logo

>>61703249
No.

>>61708324
You should have anticipated that

>>61702686
>he uses an addon to access sadpanda
lmbo xd downboated

>>61702748
nice meme

>>61707298
Yes

File: Untitled.png (295KB, 1366x738px) Image search: [Google]

295KB, 1366x738px

I think Chrome is still faster than this.

>>61709980

It's not.

>>61709980
57 isn't the full update on Nightly.
Nightly works by having features and bug fixes land every day rather than all at once so a major version update on Nightly is a bit meaningless.
You need to wait for a few weeks until the rest of 57 is released on Nightly.

>>61702625
>nightly, we only guaranty you bugs

>>61706238
Random does a lot more than spoof the UA.

>>61702734
>tfw can't even get into sadpanda with the extension
Fuck anyone using a site that complies to dmca requests though

>>61702625
>Updates to 57
>Profile missing dialog box appears every click
>reinstall
>problem still persists
>fuck this

>>61702625
its bretty fast in deed

File: 57.png (617KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

617KB, 1920x1080px

57 is pretty dope
everything working fine

>>61702625
One question: What the fuck happened to my FDV Speed Dial and why is it "not compatible" anymore?
I need a speed dial of some kind.

>>61711075
close nightly
copy content from old profile folder to desktop
create new profile in nightly
close nightly
paste content from old profile folder into newly created profile folder

>>61702748
More like

>I'm going to find a better cook!
*2 days later*
>Everyone else is even worse

so.... all the legacy addons still work

>>61711603
I'm using Fast Dial. It's not as intuitive as Speed Dial (have to make the icons yourself) but it's way faster once you set it up.

Why are umatrix and ublock still LEGACY in nightly if they're using webextensions?


Do you need to disable the xpinstall.signing.somethingsomething about:config option?

File: dog going to sleep.gif (2MB, 325x222px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 325x222px

>>61705601
>someone on /g/ reposts a thing you made years ago

File: Capture.jpg (59KB, 1117x480px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 1117x480px

Οk /g/

Explain to me why would i want to switch from regular Firefox to Nightly. Pic related is all i use.

Btw im on a toaster running on [spoiler]ddr2[/spoiler]

File: 1363813602166.jpg (16KB, 186x169px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 186x169px

>>61711780
>The Fast Dial will stop working in Firefox 57 with the Webextensions exclusive requirement for addons. See https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2016/11/23/add-ons-in-2017/ for details.
...
>By the end of 2017, and with the release of Firefox 57, we’ll move to WebExtensions exclusively, and will stop loading any other extension types on desktop. To help ensure any new extensions work beyond the end of 2017, AMO will stop accepting any new extensions for signing that are not WebExtensions in Firefox 53.

I'm sorry. Am I allowed to customize anything anymore?? Whose dick do I have to suck to just browse the goddamn internet without some bullshit going on?

I'm on nightly right now. Holy shit it's fucking fast.

I'm really surprised desu.

How does it compare to Brave?

>>61711841

I don't about the status of those extensions, but the answer for the last question is no.

>>61712068
#beBrave

I'm glad I listened to /g/ for once!
I've had very noticable gains from version:45(last version I used.)

File: otter.png (177KB, 1600x900px) Image search: [Google]

177KB, 1600x900px

>>61703117
You mean Otter.

I gotta say I'm pretty fucking impressed

This is way faster than ungoogled chromium right now

File: 1500342060963.jpg (33KB, 378x408px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 378x408px

>chrome

>not poor or a wagecuck that needs to use a portable computer
>use a powerful gaming PC
>no difference in speed between firefox and chromium
>no difference in speed between firefox 54 and 57

just build a new PC and you won't be having any speed problems with your web browser.

Just off the top of my head all I need is uBO, DownTheMall, Greasemonkey, and Tree Style Tabs. Everything else I can't say on demand so they're probably unessential.

>>61712534
This is actually what I notice too lol but I'm on a laptop.

>>61702686
>>open with
>dev confirmed webextension update

Is this true? When did it happen?
Isn't the open with functionality unavailable on the webextensions api?

File: 1167201711796.jpg (147KB, 766x960px) Image search: [Google]

147KB, 766x960px

I just want:
>Good mouse gestures that work on non-Windows systems and on the browser's internal pages.
>Vertical tabs that display newer tabs on top and don't hide when I open a bookmark or history sidebar.
>Session management that can handle a dozen saved sessions and will correctly restore the history of each tab.
I can ignore the rest of the awful redesign and questionable politics. Yet they still managed to fuck it up.
I spent 2 hours searching for webextension alternatives and found none that fulfilled the above. Apparently some of the necessary APIs are even blocked or super low priority. How did the manage to fuck up so bad?

>>61711841
They aren't webextensions yet. They will only switch when 57 gets release on the main channel.

File: 1389071036838.jpg (50KB, 550x800px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 550x800px

>>61706050
Bypass your proxy with CNTLM

I get through Bluecoat proxies with it.

But you need a SSH tunnel that accepts SOCKS5 proxy mode.

>>61702748
Literally wangblows users every fucking time.

is this shit also based on chromium?

chrome > firefox

File: 1390778567197.gif (2MB, 325x244px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 325x244px

>>61714174
That was a weak bait, but I chuckled a bit.

>>61714196
Yeah, I moved from chrome to firefox too.

Don't forget to set

layout.css.servo.enabled

to true

>>61702625
I'll check it out once they stop voicing their political opinions on MY start page.

>>61709980
is this the default theme? regardless it looks sexy as hell

>>61716110
>not having a blank or custom start page
why don't you just set msn as your homepage grandpa?

File: fx.png (12KB, 939x855px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 939x855px

>>61716110
this is the new tab page

File: Capture.png (119KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 1920x1080px

>>61716165
That's the default dark theme.
pic related is what the default theme looks like.

>>61716257
This has been a weird pattern lately. Opera and Edge both have a theme very similar to this. For once chrome is the one that stands out.

File: Untitled.png (26KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 1920x1080px

>>61716193
Wow, anon weren't lying for once. I'll keep it around then.

>>61716323
i know, it is pretty fucking based

>>61702625
I keep having an error where changing to some tabs just does nothing.

The URL will change, but it will still show the normal, interactive version of the old tab.

Buggy piece of shit. I'd move back to Chrome if it wasn't such a spying piece of crap.

>>61716057
this^
the largest perf improvements since e10s

File: 1501599009111.jpg (68KB, 664x595px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 664x595px

57 is stupid fast. I'm impressed.

>>61716452
my penis is getting hard anon. Is this really true? please give it a real good rub

File: typical australian.png (107KB, 332x333px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 332x333px

>>61716443
>>61716452
>mozilla intentionally delayed huge performance improvements so they can ship them in the first release that disables third party addons so people won't complain or switch

THEY CAN'T KEEP GETTING AWAY WITH IT

>>61716452
Don't ignore me you piece of shit

>>61716276
Firefox seems to just copy other browsers since 4
4 -> opera copy
28 -> chrome copy
57 -> edge copy

>>61702625
Can I get rid of australis yet?

File: Untitled.png (4KB, 482x66px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 482x66px

>>61716930
Tabs are square again, they also brought back the small icons option (under "Density").

>>61717127
Hm, it's an improvement. Can I put tabs underneath the search bar?

When will firefox beta prompt me to update to 56?

>>61717144
Not that I know of, no.

>>61717195
That's such an easy option to have..or just not remove. wtf man

>>61717177
september 20th
You can check https://wiki.mozilla.org/RapidRelease/Calendar for when new builds come out

>>61717213
Shouldn't it be today according to that chart?

>>61717234
oh you are correct. I misread your post as asking when 57 is coming to beta.

56 should be out by the end of today for you.

>>61702748
True

>>61717177
firefox beta is for betas

>>61717247
I like it because I can have stable or esr + a bleeding edge version installed, with dev edition, that uses a different profile by default. There's probably some way to set it up with nightly but I don't feel like reading documentation.

tampermonkey vs violentmonkey?

File: firefox_2017-08-03_19-17-12.png (6KB, 254x299px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 254x299px

Anyone else got this problem with webextensions just showing a blank menu?

>>61702625
OH MY FCKING GOD IT'S SO FAST I CAN OPEN TEN YOUTUBE TABS AND SCROLL INSTANTLY ON THEM ALL SHIT MOTHRDFUCKER

>RIP furigana inserter
Dowmthemall have a good replacement?

>>61717427
Violentmonkey. Tampermonkey is a proprietary binary blob botnet.

>>61702837
vimperator will not work, I hope you like using a mouse

>itt mozilla """contributors""" damage controlling
fucking pathetic tbqh...

>>61718086
really? could you go into more detail?

>>61702625
>FIREFOX IS BACK BABY
It never left in the first place. Only shifaces left the best browser for a subpar alternative with a catchy name

File: astolfo 12.png (513KB, 650x920px) Image search: [Google]

513KB, 650x920px

>>61716657
>layout.css.servo.enabled

With this it's even faster. Holy shit.

>>61702625
Piss off, I'm staying with Waterfox fag

File: waterfox_2017-08-03_18-26-25.png (42KB, 189x825px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 189x825px

>>61702686
I literally use tons of legacy addons and have tons of personal customizations. I'm never moving to 57+. Waterfox for life

>>61718395
you cute bimbo. I want to fuck you.

I can't believe I'm using Firefox and it's shitting all over Chrome. Chrome has NEVER been this fast.

Bravo, FF. NOW FIX THE ADDONS

>>61718498
>her

Anon... I...

>>61710663
What else does it do? Does spoofing your UA screw anything up with logged in accounts?

>>61707218
userChrome is a pain and a piece of shit.
>>61707194
Move to Waterfox. I'm in the same boat, need to customize my UI

>>61716276
>>61716257
Yeah looks fucking ugly. Metro can go die

File: 1303568270288.jpg (14KB, 155x202px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 155x202px

>he doesn't use chromium

File: ai638.jpg (22KB, 314x462px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 314x462px

>>61718794
>he uses a botnet

>>61708005
I think your shit is already fucked.

After testing it for hours i can confirmed that Nightly is better than Firefox stable release. Even the addons work and if some dont then theres a work around too.

But... >>61719183
seriously its annoying

>>61702625
F

I don't think I've ever used a browser this fast.

wtf i hate release build now

>>61718652

you got pavlov's dog'd into hating it. I honestly like it but you'd have to pay me to use edge.

File: fire-deez-nuts.png (12KB, 782x117px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 782x117px

B R A V E
R
A
V
E
https://brave.com/

>>61711841
They are hybrid extensions, so in 57 they run webext only. It could be displayed better.

>>61721641
>pavlov's dog'd
No I didn't. If anything it would be the opposite into liking this new design. This is the same reason why I stick to Windows 7, hate flat design.

>>61713766
I see Linus, but it's anyone else here a major player?

>>61721799
BOTNET
O
T
N
E
T

>>61721985
RETARD
E
T
A
R
D

its so vulnerable

>>61702625
>All the extensions are literally just Chrome-shit tier now
What a crap browser, might as well just use real chrome not this knock-off.

>>61702625
Man I sure do love these flat ass modern designs

>>61717207
isn't most of firefox's problems that they left all the ui design in the hands of some chick

>>61702625
who cares?

>>61702625
>"Nightly does not have the polish, quality and stability of the Release channel as this is a work in progress"
Why should I use Nightly over stable? I don't want a broken browser or my CPU fan to go overdrive.

Can I tabs-on-bottom yet?
Can I have a single close tab button at the end of the tab row?

>>61702734
>>61703551
>>61706308
>>61709720
I always open sadpanda in private mode, and this addon saves my login account.

>>61722931

so don't use it. be patient and wait.

File: 145.jpg (9KB, 255x197px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 255x197px

>>61718395
so fast!!!!!!!

File: internet_lies.jpg (52KB, 475x356px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 475x356px

>>61702625

File: 1489542651826.jpg (11KB, 225x225px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 225x225px

>pacman -Syu
>See new Firefox
pfffttt, probably some shit bug fixes ive never runned into
>Update finishes
>Firefox for good beats
FUCKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK
>Proceed to youtube faster than Paul Walker slamming into a pole
>mfw

>>61724776
I'm always tempted with talk of Nighlty, but I'll do just that.

>>61702686
>classicthemerestorer
>the theme I prefer
>basically anything that alters the GUI at all, which XUL can do and WE can't
>menu wizard
>download statusbar
>cleanest addon manager
>s3.google translate
>image search options
>speed dial
>half the other shit that makes firefox usable

bascially
>fuck off, shill

>webrender is still a stuttering mess
>stylo is nothing special
Yeah, it's a bit faster but it's still slower than the competition. Hurry the fuck up, mozilla.

>>61711986
>To help ensure any new extensions work beyond the end of 2017, AMO will stop accepting any new extensions for signing that are not WebExtensions in Firefox 53.

>make signing mandatory, no user-side opt out

>make giant unwanted change under the hood breaking everything

>start refusing to sign addons that don't follow along

Soon they'll be going "oh, you need to update, it's not secure because your extensions are out of date!"

>>61702625
i need frigate, otherwise no porn for me. does it work?

>>61724990
>classicthemerestorer
Why? Australis is long gone.
>inb4 tabs on bottom

>>61702748
it's the web comic version of this;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5AvrBFlJeMs

>>61725067
Australis isn't "gone", its left its "modern+minimalist+mobile" jizz all over the GUI. For one thing, I need to not have basic features like bookmarks hidden behind a hamburger menu because I'm not using a god damn phone.

>>61725104
>I need to not have basic features like bookmarks hidden behind a hamburger menu
You have two options. You can enable the bookmark toolbar or you can add a bookmark button to the main toolbar.

>I'm not using a god damn phone
Set the theme to Compact Light/Dark and density to Compact

Maybe Chrome would be a better fit for someone with your level of intelligence.

File: Screenshot_2017-08-04_15-34-19.png (84KB, 724x492px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 724x492px

memory usage is almost the same.
1.6gb with 23 tabs on 54
1.3gb with the same exact tabs on 57

>>61725158
>20% less memory
>almost the same

>he isn't using waterfox, the fastest fork

>>61725171
oops, i meant to write 1.6gb.

isn't this supposed to be the latest beta build which is buggy as fuck?

why has firefox taken control of the gui away from its userbase?

>>61725470
This is nightly. The new api is still in development.

any good downthemall alts?

anyone see the cnet article proving that this is a plot made by the shell of Mozilla?

keep an eye on beard, moving toward firefox os, google chrome return, disabling the main difference between it and the old IE, workers stopping to recommend working at mozilla, and how the CEO thinks of current Firefox editions pre 57.


https://www.cnet.com/special-reports/mozilla-firefox-fights-back-against-google-chrome/

>>61725447
It could be but it's not.
Aside from very minor ui issues which pop up from time to time because they are completely reworking the theme I didn't run into any bugs lately.

old theme looks good https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/blue-bricks/

Come on, it still takes several seconds to launch even on a fucking SSD. It's slow as shit. It's slower on my current 6600k than chropera was on my old q6600 rig.

Fuck you mozilla, you should probably make your piece of shit faster instead of "correcting sexist code" you bunch of blue-haired faggots. Fuck xou, xir.

>>61725735
just clean up your tabs anon

>>61725822
>just clean up your tabs anon
It launches with 1 tab on google as a start page... Face it, it's a piece of shit. I still have hope for the servo implementation but shit, if it takes as much time as electrolyisis, I fear it won't happen before years have passed and the other browsers will probably be even faster.

>>61706613
>About fucking time they focus on making the browser usable again.

It's a bit sad that Mozilla had to see their market share completely disappear before they finally realized that they were doing it wrong.

The only thing I don't like so far is that the menu looks like Opera 11 or 12. Too many options.

>>61725050
>frigate
Enjoy your botnet.
>does it work?
No, and they probably never update it.

>>61726110
>too many options
fucking faggot, i bet you use macbook and iphone

File: firefox.png (136KB, 1332x568px) Image search: [Google]

136KB, 1332x568px

>>61725934
My session has 250 tabs and it takes "several seconds" to load.
A fresh session starts instantly.

That's sad, zoom isn't per site basis anymore.
There's no alternative to firefox, it's a shame...

>>61726194
>majority of the start up take at least a second
>instantly

>>61726194
>doesnt have flash

>>61726256
>having flash
just let it go

File: 1496180106169.gif (1MB, 540x540px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 540x540px

I'll keep using chromium until I can modify firefox gui again.
Also better alternative for rikaisama since I dislike yomichan mechanism when doing translating.

I figure this is as good a place as any, but in chrome there was an addon for twitter to see tweets you're following like push notifications on phone.
I can't find anything like that on firefox.

>>61707405

>NoScript

You should use uMatrix, it does virtually the same except allows for a finer grade of control and presents it in a clearer way.

>>61726870

It seems like it, does it comes with a white/black list?

>>61726913

Of course. It is developed by the same guy who develops uBlock Origin

>>61726944

Too bad, I don't like them.

>>61702625
Shut the fuck up with the "so fast" bullshit.

Open one twitch stream, after 20 minutes firefox slows to a fucking crawl, to the point it's unusable. Chrome has NO problem streaming channels.

Fucking Mozilla has no clue how to compete with Chrome when it comes to stability and performance.

>>61727019

?

How does "liking" pertain to anything? It does the job better and is developed by someone who keeps the add-on completely FOSS.

Anyway, your loss. But you might do well to reflect on your decision-making process

File: ok.png (197KB, 1524x938px) Image search: [Google]

197KB, 1524x938px

how bad is it doc?

>>61727150
>watching streams on a browser
The point of a web browser is to render html documents, not to be a fucking gay js operating system.

>>61727183
yes grandpa, just like the point of a phone is to make phone calls

File: piston1.gif (2MB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 300x300px

>gimping the firefox performance slowly
>accidentally forgot to apply gimp for ver 57
>OMG FAST

>>61727198
Fucking retards like you are the reason firefox has gone to shit, trying to pander to normalfags. If you really want to be a faggot and use your programs in the most inefficient way then stay away from firefox.

>>61727183
Ho Li Shit, that's got to be the neckbeard comment of the century.

File: ss-2017-08-04-15-05-00.png (1MB, 1680x1050px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1680x1050px

>>61727239
haha u mad

>>61727280
>>61727329
>>>/v/

>>61727280
He's right though.
Multimedia should be handled in another process. Now, the browser can totally handle the other process, but it should be isolated from the main browsing.

>>61727329
>twitch

so you are a cuck "gamer"

>>61727183
I miss the 90's too

>>61702686
>undo close tab

FF 57 is fast with Twitch. Idk what you fucks are talking about.

Where did my tree style tabs go?

>>61729690
Doesn't work on the latest nightly. Welcome to the future, nerd.

>still slower and more of a resource hog than chrome, opera, and edge
that's amazing how do the sjws do it

Not even greasemonkey and 4chan x works any more.

>>61730097
They will soon (hopefully).

File: firefox.tabs.memory.png (38KB, 962x598px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 962x598px

>>61729775
>citation needed

Reminder: WebExtension is a protocol standard will work between chrome and opera too!

Reducing required workloads and allowing portability and allowing more developers to work together.

EDGE BTFO

>>61718132
>vimperator will not work
bu-but I like it.

>>61717127
You might have missed it but the last few builds also allow you to rearrange the navigation icons again. You can remove the stop/refresh button or move it wherever you like and you can also indirectly move the back and forward buttons by placing buttons between them or the location bar. You still cannot remove the back and forward buttons or the location bar but you can now move them around somewhat

File: ok.jpg (25KB, 527x204px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 527x204px

>>61730254
don't mind the botnet it was the last to load

File: firefox.56.startup.tabs.png (39KB, 958x597px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 958x597px

>>61730358
Seems like a skewed result.

I'd prefer to see a video with a fresh install and profile and evidence that you don't have tabs open.

Not a obfuscated picture of your desktop.

>>61730432
They were all one tab, on /g/ catalog.
Test it yourself babe, you'll see firefox is still just as useless as it has always been.

>>61730488
>They were all one tab, on /g/ catalog.
Learn to read you retard nigger and redo the test with 1691 tabs.

>>61730488
Get back to me when you are running freedom respecting software for your operating system.

>>61722200
That'd explain a lot.

Just tried it and it seems like only e10 incompatible addons are disabled

>>61702625
haven't used firefucks in ages, first thing I noticed is that the fonts are way better than in chrome

>>61730254
But why should ram matter nowadays?
16gb is becoming mainstream. 32gb is enthusiast.
And if I have 32gb of ram. Firefox should use that. I don't want Firefox to write to disk. I don't want to re-render all the time.
Please use the ram available efficiently.

>>61727238
>>gimping the firefox performance slowly
Integrating servo components is making firefox faster tho

There's so much misinformation spread about firefox on /g/ wtf

>>61732732
>There's so much misinformation spread about firefox on /g/ wtf
It's because most firefox users are so bitter about the retarded direction the project took that they don't call out shills anymore.

File: chrome_2017-08-04_14-26-09.png (10KB, 136x63px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 136x63px

>>61707114
this can't be a coincidence

Does anyone have an issue with Keefox not auto completing logins?

What happened to that other thread with the neon firefox icon and 80s wallpapers and shit? Did one of you niglets report it? If so FUCK YOU. I was just about to open it on a different machine to get the papes. Now I have to go to a stupid board like /wg/. Fuck off.

Why does Nightly keep locking up on 4chan or youtube? Or when I try to open any video? Wtf? Is it always this bad? Only installed it on Ubuntu a few days ago for the supposed speed boosts. This is bullshit.

>>61733985
Well shit. Went back to regular Firefox and keefox works again. Goddammit, are all my extensions going to get fucked now?

>>61734039
Just doing my part cleaning up this place from toxic men like you.

>>61734097
clean up the consumer shit before you clean up actual tech threads, dipshit.
here's an example of what you should be cleaning up you fucking faggot
>>61733748
and yes i will tell you what to do, try and stop me

>>61734118
pape threads aren't actual tech threads
break the rules, thread gets deleted it's that simple
so let's get back to talking about technology instead of whatever your autistic fit is about!

File: Add-Ons.png (287KB, 1444x2131px) Image search: [Google]

287KB, 1444x2131px

>>61702686
Good addon selection anon

A lot of mine broke though

File: 1474723486114.jpg (13KB, 168x215px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 168x215px

>>61723941
> Tfw anon doesn't even have a seperate password-protected porn profile with bookmarks, history, settings and add-ons
Your perverted taste is leaking anon-chan

>>61716917
>57 -> edge copy
that would imply that someone gives a dam about Internet explorer
Square tabs for Firefox are not new.

File: Untitled.png (16KB, 163x154px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 163x154px

IT'S HERE

>>61735409
>firefox
>nightly icon
Just wait until they release the updated one for stable.

File: LMAO.jpg (9KB, 238x250px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 238x250px

>Still no a small sum of available restartless add-ons

>>61727685
Go stumble on a chode.

>>61716499
Sorry you got no replies, the firefox shills are on high alert this week.

How are people getting this new icon?

File: Untitled.png (46KB, 699x389px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 699x389px

>>61735616
Manually check for updates, Nightly has gotten a few over the course of today and the new icon is in the latest of about a couple hours at most.

>>61713398
>Good mouse gestures that work on non-Windows systems and on the browser's internal pages.
On internal pages, never.

>Vertical tabs that display newer tabs on top and don't hide when I open a bookmark or history sidebar.
Probably never cause vertical tabs uses a sidebar and afaik you can't have more than one opened.

>Session management that can handle a dozen saved sessions and will correctly restore the history of each tab.
There's an approved api for that so maybe soon.

>>61702686
Open-with will most likely require you to install additional software and it will act as a service listening for calls from the addon. Kind of sucks but got to make do.

>>61735656
Way better than the lone globe

File: firefox_2017-08-04_17-48-41.png (309KB, 1336x349px) Image search: [Google]

309KB, 1336x349px

its the 32bit flavor that has new style

>>61716499
You can use legacy addons on nightly flipping some about:config values.

All legacy extensions that are full e10s compatible should work at least for some time, the ones using shims will stop working soon.

But everybody will say that all this improvement is thanks to removing old extensions.

>>61735706
>people are using a 32bit browser in 2017
no wonder /g/ is constantly enraged

>>61717535
Check if you're running the latest nightly cause that it's supposed to be fixed already, if you're on the latest version try with extensions.webextensions.remote False

>>61717942
Scroll works asynchronously now, so even with the page frozen you will be able to scroll smoothly but not interact with it.

>still a ram hog
HOW DO THEY KEEP GETTING AWAY WITH IT???

>>61718075
No, can't be done with the actual APIs and the requested ones got WONTFIX status, the webextensions download managers available have less features and can't use multiple segments per download.

File: Screen Shot 2017-08-04 at 6.59.40 PM.png (267KB, 915x562px) Image search: [Google]

267KB, 915x562px

garbage defaults already

Does nightly still have the Firefox telemetry ?

>>61718501
> Bravo, FF. NOW FIX THE ADDONS

Already requested, they decided not to do it:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1199718

What should I use, as htitle is no longer compatible?

File: file.png (73KB, 683x365px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 683x365px

>>61735706
?

File: eb7pz9wwesdz.png (66KB, 735x405px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 735x405px

>>61735706
Wrong, see pic related. 64bit also has the new style.
>>61735852
You can disable those by clicking on the gear.
>>61735870
Why wouldn't it?

>>61719487
I have no over scrolling... check if apz.overscroll.enabled is set to true but afaik it should be on false by default.

>>61735930
>You can disable those by clicking on the gear.
oh how the mighty have fallen

>>61735930
/g/ thinks Telemetry is botnet

>>61735930
you seem to not understand what default settings are, they are the thing 99% of people never change.
Literally cancer / 10

>>61735945
there is no "x thinks..."
it's the textbook example of a botnet

>>61735945
>telemetry the tracking and monitoring feature of firefox is not botnet

Is HTTPS Everywhere migrating to WebExt?

>>61735946
>the thing 99% of people never change
And the thing 99% of people don't care about.
Only asper/g/ers like you think pocket is useless

>tfw it beats chromes benchmark scores by like 66% on my machine

Officially not a meme. Impressed.

>>61735990
t. mozi//a shill
go back to sucking dick you're better at that

>>61735995
>benchmark scores
>not a meme
what happened to all those times furries dismissed benchmark scores? :thinks:

File: nightly.png (255KB, 930x508px) Image search: [Google]

255KB, 930x508px

>>61735930
Nope didnt change for me?

>>61736014
Maybe they didn't update the windows build for some reason.

>>61735990
So anyone with differing opinions and different preferences is a shill?

they probably changed the icon because it looks similar to pale moon's

File: ffin2k17.png (979KB, 1552x976px) Image search: [Google]

979KB, 1552x976px

what gives with the white min-max-close buttons?

>>61736047
the new icon looks pretty awesome

HTITLE!!!!

Reminder to disable Pozilla's creeping botnet
https://github.com/ghacksuserjs/ghacks-user.js/raw/master/user.js

Comb it through and comment/tweak it according to your needs. Drop it in your user profile folder (~/.mozilla/firefox/<profilename>/) and restart your browser. Take backups!

>>61735971
People still use that trash?

>>61735971
https://www.eff.org/files/https-everywhere-test/index.html
yeah, works well
>>61736261
I find the alternatives worse than the small performance hit of HTTPS Everywhere

File: Untitled.png (57KB, 1692x610px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 1692x610px

How fucked am I and is it true that my Greasemonkey scripts will all work for nu-Firefox?

>>61730097
extensions.allow-non-mpc-extensions;true
extensions.legacy.enabled;true

If it still not working reply to this post.

>>61730298
Edge supports web-extensions too.

>>61703039
Shit layout and absolutely proprietary. When you install it you get a window with terms & conditions. Wtf? Violentmokey is the way to go.

>>61718547
Not him but it can change your user agent at random intervals from a big list and lets you whitelist sites. Although honestly spoofing your user agent doesn't really give you much of a privacy bonus because your IP remains the same, if anything an administrator looking at the logs might notice you more because one IP keeps having esoteric user agents like "opera on freebsd" which is way more uncommon that Firefox on linux or chrome on windows.

>>61711841
They are hybrid extensions, WebExtensions packaged in the old XUL extension format. The point is that the dev still has access to the old API and can export the settings/data from the add-on to the new format. They are a migration step to be later upgraded to full WE without any configuration change/loss.

File: 1501863016839.png (313KB, 524x433px) Image search: [Google]

313KB, 524x433px

damn you niggas weren't kidding

>>61702625
Cool. How can I install this on my chromebook?

>>61736355
>is it true that my Greasemonkey scripts will all work for nu-Firefox?
Greasemonkey is changing up some of the GM_* API, so some scripts will stop working. Some scripts may never work properly again due to limitations in Chrome's extension model. Chrome is designed to load the page FAST, and there is no time to wait to read user settings from the hard drive before starting to load stuff on the page.

I'm liking it a lot but getting the fonts to look right is a pain in vivaldi it just worked

>>61724990
>classicthemerestorer
The new theme is fine, I didn't like it at first either but realistically it's just rounded tabs and the menu on the right instead of the left. The newest Firefox nightlies dropped the weird icon view in the menu and it's a list again.
>download statusbar
You can just click the download icon for a quick overview or open the library if you really want to watch the download the whole time.
>cleanest addon manager
You don't need to manage your addons everyday, just use the default addon manager.
>s3.google translate
I think there are other translate addons, or you could just use the site.
>speed dial
Pretty sure that's the default new tab page.

>>61736261
>>61736286
what are the alternatives?

>>61736669
SSD is the standard now anyway, what a retarded reasoning.

>>61736048

.titlebar-button:not(:hover) { background: transparent !important; }

I'm using that on the dark theme with density compact, it's a bug present if you have changed your windows theme.

if you need to change the button color you can use this:

.titlebar-button:not(:hover) { 
    background: transparent !important;
    color: white !important;
}

Ps. add the xul namespace and put it inside your userChrome.css file

m-muh tree style tabs

how do I get 4chan X and ublock origin on it?

File: 1484788018366.jpg (103KB, 540x720px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 540x720px

>>61737491

> not using tree style tabs

>>61725011
Go see for yourself for updates
http://www.arewefastyet.com

>>61725158
Which task manager is that?

>>61727150
Update your drivers and deactivate Flash then. I'm leaving Firefox open for weeks with several windows with hundreds of tabs, and performance stays the same. Also, are you using the 64bit version? Maybe your tabs are hitting the 4GB limit.

>>61734072
I'll bite.
Update your drivers, make sure you're using the 64bit version of Firefox, install latest uBlock Origin, update uMatrix to the latest 4chan bug fix release (if you use it), and *most importantly* flip layers.acceleration.force-enabled in about:config to true and restart - Hardware accelleration is disabled by default on Linux. This enables it.