Why would anyone get a glued together hack job cpu when they

>>61676572

I'd rather have a glued together hack job cpu then a cpu showing unexpected behavior when using core functionality.

File: intel-skylake-x-delid-tim-image-1.jpg (101KB, 1814x1122px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 1814x1122px

You tell me, OP.

File: 1496423670269.png (234KB, 882x758px) Image search: [Google]

234KB, 882x758px

>>61676572

>>61676608

>>61676849
You know it's funny, nowhere did I mention AMD or Intel yet everyone seems to know that with intel you'll get the proven supported performance chips why with AMD you'd get a glued together hot mess

File: delid_this_logo.png (334KB, 679x702px) Image search: [Google]

334KB, 679x702px

>>61677933
No we just know that's the line Intel shills use, shill

>>61677933
Brian, you need new talking points to avoid being labeled as a shill immediately.

>>61677933
>nowhere did I mention AMD
it was obvious with your shitty bait. stick with your overpriced housefire underperforming glued CPU

>>61676572
We could ask the people who bought the Pentium d, pr the core 2 quad,

File: Capture.png (62KB, 710x830px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 710x830px

>>61677933
it sure is a mystery

>>61676572
You're right, Intel CPUs are glued together with rat piss while AMD has them soldered, the proven method for good thermals.