What bleeding edge GNU/Linux distro is your favorite? I've already used a couple and want to use one of the following; Debian Sid/Unstable (or testing, for a little bit of extra stability), openSUSE Tumbleweed, or Fedora Rawhide?
>>61672755
I picked Arch in 2015 and haven't changed it since.
Enjoy your bugs.
>>61672773
The point is, I'm using Arch on my desktop and am distro hopping in my laptop. I wanted to try a new bleeding edge distro.
>>61672755
void
>>61672755
Bleeding edge sucks. Stable is more more comfy. Just avoid hardware that's not supported by stable yet.
Had to install a backport kernel on Debian once for hardware support. Never again...
>>61672755
KDE Neon is quite nice
>>61672755
>What bleeding edge GNU/Linux distro is your favorite?
None. I need a stable system for work and can't afford any downtime.
>>61672953
Good luck then. I hope you find some decent distro out there that isn't arch.
>>61673428
Did you just accidentally place arch into the "decent distro" collection?
>>61672755
I use expect scripts to fetch the latest releases from FTP and compile them myself
my dude
>>61673282
This.
Rolling releases are meme (at least at the moment)
>>61673282
>>61673355
>running rolling release bleeding edge distro
>0s downtime
maybe the problem is you
Hereby I thank Arch Linux for making rolling release a meme and destroying all hope that stable bleeding edge distros like Gentoo would ever catch on.
>>61672755
LFS-dev + direct git checkout when available, mainline kernel from kernel.org
>>61672755
One distro to rule them all.
>>61676227
fekkin kek
long live debian