>his operating system doesnt use NTFS for its filesystem

>>61659987
>his OS doesn't support much more efficient and better file systems like Btrfs while Linux can handle a wide variety of them, even that piece of shit NTFS.

File: 1481763072137.jpg (56KB, 907x661px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 907x661px

>his os doesn't use redoxfs

>>61659987
>his OS is still stuck with a filesystem that’s over 10 years old, that has a lot of limitations and lacks a ton of features
Thank god I’m using APFS now.

>he cannot name a single advantage of NTFS (it has none).
>his OS can ONLY use NTFS

>>61659987
>his OS doesn't use FAT16 by default

>>61660115
>APFS
I'm hoping this will get ported to bsd

>>61659987
ZFS above all

>>61660115
What advantages does Btrfs have over ext4?

File: 2017-07-31 09_11_15-Desktop.png (4KB, 349x61px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 349x61px

>his filesystem can't handle filenames over a certain length or certain characters

>>61660188
snapshots (for backups) and subvolumes (moving the concept of making partitions to divide your storage into segments to the filesystem, allowing your "partitions" to share the same space so they can all grow to the maximum instead of having partitions with excess space on one and too little on the other)

File: kek.png (9KB, 706x669px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 706x669px

>>61659987
>he doesn't use F2FS on his HDDs

>>61660142
Keep dreaming.

>not using superior APFS.

It's like you guys ENJOY being spied on.

>his OS doesn't support device access through file IO
>his OS doesn't support logical volume management
>his OS doesn't support ZFS (stfu about LVM being redundant)
>his OS only supports PE executable formats
>his OS can't be recompiled at will

>>61660110
>SWJware
no thanks, I'll stick to ext4

>>61660110
a filesystem named after the shittiest kind of chemical reaction

>niqqas feeling smug but can't into ReiserFS, the only /g/ approved FS

Why is NTFS considered shit?

>>61660192
What's the explanation for this?

>>61659987
Why would you? You can't even pass around anything over 10gigs

>>61660949
backwards compatability

>>61660948
Because it's shit

File: 1500935501053_01_01.jpg (6KB, 149x58px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 149x58px

He doesnt use Exfat

>>61659987
>bragging about NTFS

Good goy. Next, brag about all the feces you consume.

My god can't you guys just use windows? Who cares about ntfs,apfs,ext4 or any of these shits when you can have a fully fonctional os who doesn't break everytime u try to tweak it to make it look a bit more like windows

>>61660037
>btrfs
it's certificated horse shit.

>>61659987
But that's literally the main reason I switched to Linux, to get away from this piece of shit filesystem and general restrictions. On Linux, I can choose whatever I want, even NTFS.

I remember there was a patch you could apply to Windows XP that gave you EXT2 support. Or maybe EXT1.
Either way, one of them.
Are there any for modern Windows?

Seems there is a few:
http://www.ext2fsd.com/
https://www.diskinternals.com/linux-reader/
https://sourceforge.net/projects/ext2read/

>>61660192
It's not the filesystem, it's the OS. You can use at least some of them on Linux.

>>61659987
In what way OP?

File: Screen Shot 2017-07-31 at 12.34.04 AM.png (771KB, 2880x1800px) Image search: [Google]

771KB, 2880x1800px

>>61659987
>his operating system doesn't use APFS for its filesystem

>>61661384
There is even an oc btrfs port for Windows.

>>61660903

Reiser4 > ReiserFS

>>61661439
No, not enough murder.

>>61660115
>>61660142
>>61660608
>>61661427

>no checksums
>no compression
>no unicode normalization
>case-insensitive default

kek

>>61661450

That's OK, I never planned to marry anyway.

>>61661485
I couldn't understand the unicode normalization thing while setting up zfs, could you explain it please?

>>61661510
No

>>61661510
Unicode characters can be represented multiple ways, é can be represented as U+00E9 (single code point) or as U+0065 U+0301 (the character e AND the character ´)

Unicode normalization is when you always choose one or the other, when you DON'T normalize you can have two filenames with the same character (to you) but it's actually two different characters because they weren't normalized (so for example you could have two files named é.txt). This problem is exasperated because Apple used to do it in HFS and now doesn't and the fact that APFS has both case sensitive and case intensive modes which further fucks things up.

You can read more on it if you want:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unicode_equivalence
https://eclecticlight.co/2017/04/06/apfs-is-currently-unusable-with-most-non-english-languages/

>>61660338
Didnt know about subvolumes, does this let you then easily run different linux distros on one hdd? Instead of particioning them

File: 1501459928764.jpg (253KB, 960x1280px) Image search: [Google]

253KB, 960x1280px

>>61659987
>he didn't write his own filesystem for his own os

>>61661370
One time, I grew a pound of some gnarly shrooms in horse shit. I made a few thousand bucks. I literally turned shit into cash.

>>61661749
Thank you, Got it now.

>>61661770

You can boot with root on a subvolume, so it should be theoretically possible.
Might get a little tricky setting up the bootloader though.

ntfs is garbage

File: 4151123475_4b5ab94cf8_o.png (25KB, 496x306px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 496x306px

lol

>>61661833
Did you have to sterilize them?