musk you magnificent bastard
>>61619795
>crumple zones are bad
>>61619861
That's a T-bone collision. The driver of the Volvo would be dead.
>>61619861
>humans are crumple zones
>>61619919
>>61619935
In Europe these tests are done by independent agencies who use very advanced crash test dummies to measure exactly what happens to the occupants.
When it gets 5 Euro NCAP stars it means it's very safe.
American cars are death traps exactly because they think a single picture tells them what is safe and what isn't.
When a manufacturer makes safety claims it means nothing.
>>61620097
...
the driver in vulva dead. read test
>>61620123
>read test
What test?
Test done by Tesla?
Test done by some retarded American agency?
>>61619795
it only scored a 6/10 in style though
who cares. Botnet car
>>61619861
>>61619919
>>61619935
>not making the entire car a crumple zone
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_r5UJrxcck
>>61620291
i worry about this, even now most cars use electronics to ignite, then "smart" features like auto park, inbuilt gps, mics, etc are becoming more common. It only takes one exploit or one privy government
>>61619795
Lol, slower than a GT86/BRZ