https://www.techspot.com/review/1450-core-i7-vs-ryzen-5-hexa-core/
Something must be wrong here. Is Intel just out of their minds? Isn't Skylake-X supposed to be great at gaming? How can a $400 CPU lose to one that's $220?
Maybe I'm comparing apples to oranges here, but as far as I know, that CPU is supposed to be for high-end gaming. I don't know.
>>61608065
Buy Intel if u wanna be taken serious!
>>61608065
It's because of their changes to the cache and uncore. Coffee Lake is coming, which won't have those changes, and will have six cores along with 7700K-esque clock speeds. It's going to destroy both of these things for gaming.
>>61608065
>ryzen 5 running at 4.0ghz
>stock 7800x runs at 3.5
>>61608065
I CANT' TAKE THIS ANYMORE
>>61608133
Are you blind or just retarded?
seems like the game is bottlenecked.
are there more games tested?
>>61608065
>>61608126
I thought /g/ didn't care about gaming
>>61608149
basically this
>not running games at the 2017 standard: 240x135
Fuck off, amdrone
>>61608210
>not playing games in 600x480 on a 4k screen
wtf is wrong with you?
>>61608210
>>61608224
800x600
640x480
320x240
160x120
80x60
40x30
20x15 = the only valid benchmark
>>61608238
disgusting but true.
>>61608126
Just oc the fucking mesh.
It will just perform same
>>61608238
>>61608275
>not 4x3
Hello sir, I ask that you please delete this post
If you will we here at Intel have a special offer for you.
Email us at [email protected]
>>61608298
That's bullshit though. Overclocking the bingmesh does little to nothing for its gaming performance.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mTQ6ymQIY64
>>61608210
>Running games at all
Come on now, its 2017
>>61608126
>Coffee Lake is coming, which won't have those changes, and will have six cores along with 7700K-esque clock speeds.
Unless 14nm+ to 14nm++ is some sort of miracle, not happening. They already milked that cow once. Diminishing returns will have kicked in already.
Also, the chances of it coming out this year are slim to none. We haven't even seen motherboards yet and the supposed leaked release date is in August.
>>61608843
It's already happening, friend. Skylake-X is a very good overclocker when you keep the heat and temperatures under control. People are getting their 7800Xs to 4.8GHz quite easily, which puts it very much in 7700K territory. It still doesn't perform in games at that speed due to other factors, but those won't be in place for Coffee Lake.
There's no reason to think that it won't overclock AT LEAST as well as Skylake-X. In fact, it'll almost certainly be better on that front, being based on Kaby Lake and not having the huge heat and power draw increases that were down to the architectural changes Intel made. It's just a 7700K with two more cores.
Leaks are starting to pick up pace as well, so I wouldn't be too worried about the release date.
>>61608946
7700K is already a pain to OC w/o delid and watercooling so I don't see many people hitting 5 GHz on these at all.
>>61608946
>that voltage
>jew jizz
>smoll 1151 IHS size
How do you cool that?
>>61609010
You run it for long enough to get your cinebench result and avoid meltdown. Then hide the temperature readings.
>>61609029
there is a reason as to why they test them at iceland...
the only country with big enough heat exchangers
>>61608981
>>61609010
The 7700K certainly IS a massive pain to keep cool at 5GHz without delidding, which is why I find it dumb when people talk about it as the "standard" overclock for it, but they do anyway. In reality, 4.8GHz is more achievable on every chip, on air, with no delidding. Matching that should be no issue for Coffee Lake, given that hexa core Skylake-X parts are already doing it, despite their inherent heat and power disadvantages.
>>61609062
>hexa core Skylake-X parts are already doing it
While being housefires and having a bigger IHS.
>>61608065
>Even when clocked at 4.7 GHz it is still slower than R5 1600 at stock
>R5 1600, not even XFR enabled
>R5 also consumes half the power
top fucking kek, intel dun goofed real hard this time.
Those new CPUs are rewriting the definition of housefire.
>>61609082
>While being housefires
It's like you didn't even read my posts in your rush to meme.
>a bigger IHS
Irrelevant. We're talking a tiny increase in surface area, and Intel's thermal paste does a piss poor job of transferring heat from the cores to the IHS anyway.
>>61609062
That's assuming Intel is even binning these for higher clockspeeds.
>>61608065
that game is capped at 120hz you colossal lying mongoloid
>>61609149
>>61608177
nu/g/ is infested with /r/amd, so they force feed gpu bottlenecked, or other gaymin benchmarks when it makes an amd cpu look decent while downplaying the other more popular games.
Benchmarks with games that shit on amd =
>go back to /v/
Benchmarks that where amd can keep up =
> look at dis guise
>>61610459
>1080Ti
>m-muh bottleneck
>fucking amdfags!
>>61608133
>Different architecture
>Different clock speeds
Found the retard.
>>61608177
If something /g/ likes is good at gaming, gaming is important. If something /g/ doesn't like is good at gaming, gaming doesn't matter and they'll tell you to go to /v/. This board is just shills arguing with shills forever.
>>61613802
/g/aming
>>61610459
>nu/g/ is infested with /r/amd
yeah because nvidiots and intel shills don't shit up the board every time they have a major launch, just how new are you
>>61608065
OY VEYYY STOP THIS NOW GOYIM!
WE NEED TO SUPPORT ISRAEL BUY MORE INTEL CPUS
SHREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
What the fuck was Intel doing all this time, too busy focusing of Diversity Hirers?
>>61609204
That does not inspire any confidence that you'll be able to easily OC Coffee Lake.
>>61614362
Maybe if you're retarded I guess. 4GHz all core turbo out of the box compared to the 7800X's 4GHz single core turbo, and the latter can reach 4.7-4.8GHz easily.
>>61614332
Yes
>>61614410
They aren't binning mainstream CPUs the same way.
>>61614476
They literally didn't fund feminist frequency though, what are those fake news writers at breitbart even doing?
They did waste 300m on diversity hiring, but they did not fund femenist frequency. Literally fake news.
>>61608065
7800X w/ 4000C17 > 1800X w/ 3600C16
>>61615962
proof_chicken.png
>>61608065
Can you post a more retarded benchmark?
>>61608312
Is it the straffinik?
>>61608441
Why does thou insult thy main reason you're not still on a pentium 4?
Is the desktop market even really that big of a deal? AMD isn't going to make mad money until they launch mobile CPUs, right? EPYC looks amazing, but it'll be at least a year before they start selling those in volume because security reasons.
>>61608133
>>61614578
Is the Breitbart
>>61614203
>SHREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
my sides
>>61608149
Hey he is a visually impaired mentally challenged person
>>61608065
I HATE AMD I HATE AMD I HATE AMD
>>61617356
Kys urself >>61611211
>>61608092
Listen to this go- I mean boy
>>61608946
>bus speed 99.98MHz
>core speed 5000.00MHz
HMMMMMMMMMMMM
REALLY MAKES YOU THINK
>>61608946
One thing I notice here is that I'd expect the CB score to be more like 1694 at 5 GHz. That's a whole 100 points off. Probably whoever got this sample couldn't cool it properly and it was throttling thus the lower score.