Camera General

>went to costco to get my 35mm developed
>"sorry we don't do that anymore"
>go to cvs
>have to drop it in an envelope and wait to be called two weeks later to pick it up
>$15 for prints and a cd and you don't even get your negatives back
what has the world come to
I know digital is just as good as film now but it costs thousands to get to that level of fidelity with digital when a you can get a good film camera on ebay for $100
why is everyone abandoning such good tech?

>>61567385
It seems like there is a market for some kind of 35mm color film that can be scanned on a typical home flatbed scanner.

>>61567548
Addendum: by that I mean film which can be developed without a darkroom or needing to be sent off somewhere.

photography is a hobby for bugmen

Is the DSCHX90 any good? looking for a hiking camera so things influencing my choice are
>compact
>zoom
>mini sun proof lens thing (viewfinder?)
>price (under £350)

planning on nature shots and some astro shots also can you turn off metadata in the options is that standard or will I have to strip it myself before uploading and archiving?
also

What're some websites to upload pictures to? the more privacy the better not imgur though

>>61566110
i'll stick my dick in a sony nex sensor if someone tells me how to convert the footage to webm in lonix

>>61568568
FFMPEG

File: Info53.png (128KB, 1446x1165px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 1446x1165px

>>61568568
use this >>61568597

>>61568628
yo hol up fammo, just got distracted

>>61568415
it's a point and shoot with a 7% larger sensor than phones, you will suffer from huge noise problems in low light and taking astro photos would take longer than what's it's worth.

>>61567548
>>61567597
That would be genius because negative scanners are pretty cheap on amazon and skipping the development step would be huge.

>>61567385
Develop the film yourself, it's not that hard.

>>61569214
it's expensive

>>61569186
It almost like thing like that, already exists
https://www.aliexpress.com/item/2015-Hot-High-Resolution-Scanner-Digital-Converts-Negatives-Slides-Photo-Scan-Film/32549562150.html

>>61569219
The development itself is not expensive. I'm currently paying less than 0.20€ per roll for bw.
Color costs about 1,50€ when diy, but only 1€ + ~2€ for prints if I give it to the lab.

>>61569235
can you even read

>>61569260
Yea but because I'm not a retard and know how flatbed scanners work, I know it's impossible, what I know is that people have made a simple negative scanner for people like you.

>>61569152
anything better at that size and price point?

>>61569354
that's some fucking technology right there pal

>>61569274
the post you quoted literally said negative scanners

>>61569378
and I gave you link to a negative scanner.

>>61569356
all I could find was DMC-LX100, sensor is 4/3 and it's about 61% larger than your smartphone, it's not as big as APS-C but finding any reasonably priced APS-C camera with zoom is just impossible.

>>61569503
Any entry level DLSR with kit lens can produce good results if you know what you're doing. Also, don't forget the GR.

>>61569356
get this >>61569354
nex 5 is great, the 16-50mm kit lens is great too and you can pick them up turbo cheap

I'm still using a fucking Canon G2 limited combined with vintage Russian lenses I got on eBay

>>61569597
I searched nex 5 on amazon, nothing came up :(

>>61569611
The later models are alpha 6XXX.

>>61569535
I did check GR2 and it seemed more limited than DMC-LX100
>Any entry level DLSR
Well, tried to avoid any DLSR or Mirrorless, amusing point and shoot is desired format.

>>61569611
they are around
https://www.amazon.com/Sony-Compact-Interchangeable-Touchscreen-18-55mm/dp/B005IHAIJ8
>>61569629
the a6xxx ones are great too but if you on a budget the nex series are still nice

Film is still greater than Digital

>>61567597
Pajeet detected

>>61569635
The GR has snap focus, but I love the shutterspeed dial of the LX100 and Fuji X.

File: ohnardigitalslidecopier.jpg (77KB, 508x421px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 508x421px

>>61569186

There are adapters that let you "scan" negatives with dslr.

Yet to find some good chink one.

File: 1000-Panasonic-Lumix-LX100-Black-7_1412597824.jpg (129KB, 1000x753px) Image search: [Google]

129KB, 1000x753px

What's the best small form factor digital camera with full physical controls? I'm thinking of the Lumix LX100.

>>61570557
Fuji X-E series if you want interchangeable lenses.

If I even wanted an entry level one which would I buy considering I know nothing about photography and probably wont even buy one just hypothetically speaking