Macs don't get viru.....................HAHAHAHAHA HAHA

>>61549289
Fuck off android shill

>>61549289
>Macs don't get viru
I can't remember the last time someone said that unironically.

>>61549336
I unfortunately can. Fortunately, this cult-tier mactard could be safely written off as a retard.

>>61549289
That was bad. All those files lost, all those accounts compromised, all those ransoms paid.

Oh, wait...

>>61549411
Just a guys archiving you masturvating nbd

File: 1495984615961.jpg (11KB, 251x239px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 251x239px

>>61549466
As long as he liked it.

>>61549483
As long as that entity doesn't feel the need to blackmail you , or worse , just post it online for shits and giggles .

>Wardle suspects it involves tricking users into clicking on malicious links, as opposed to exploiting vulnerabilities in apps or in macOS.

it's going to be another "please install this app and disable Gatekeeper first". Hence the low infection numbers.

File: 1500868501402.jpg (285KB, 1125x1252px) Image search: [Google]

285KB, 1125x1252px

>>61549289
>1 virus in 5 years

lol you seem like a butthurt faggot Wangshaft users who runs an anti-virus 24/7 that eats up 10% of his CPU power.

Stay mad, Bill Gates.

>>61549706
Avast can idle with 9kb of memory just fine.

>>61550924
try doing something advanced with your computer.

>>61549289
You realize this is nothing significant right? 400 infections? Mirai is 300,000. BedoLabs was 30 MILLION Windows infections. Apple sells literally more Macs in 20 minutes (About 800 FYI) than this shitty trojan managed to infect in 5 fucking years.

>>61551466
Most Mac users I know lead more productive workdays using their computers than the average /g/ autist accomplishes in their entire life. Hell the only reason I come to this shithole anymore is for /dpt/, or when my code is compiling, so I kill some time trolling the spergs on here.

This here is nothing. Altough if macs had a significant marketshare it would be a security desaster. Security on OSX was never a focus and all the FreeBSD code is insecure as shit. The only thing security wise Apple got right was IOS. But of course it's locked down like shit, so you are at the mercy of their censorship system to hopefully allow things you might want to run.

>>61551698
The FreeBSD portions are actually relatively alright. The biggest escalation problems are where the mach and BSD portions meet. I would say the second biggest is userspace vulnerabilities, followed by misconfigured sandbox profiles. The market share meme is bullshit, and the kind of attacks targeting Linux servers prove it. Notice how rarely the attacks target the kernel or core utils? It's almost always targeting a misconfiguration, or vulnerability in a network aware application like Apache or Drupal.