why is this browser so perfect

File: Untitled.png (27KB, 418x398px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 418x398px

why bother with all that fuckery?

You can do the same in the nightly/beta(?) of firefox

>>61538837
>scrot

also converters are god tier

>>61538889
>save link to (((pocket)))

Can't be perfect if it's not open source.

File: Dev48_Ruble.png (622KB, 1280x800px) Image search: [Google]

622KB, 1280x800px

>>61538921

>>61538889
you don't get it

Why is that a browser feature? Any decent OS has this built in.

>>61538837

>Closed source chrome reskin

You're joking right? RIGHT!??!

Screengrab does this in FF (well until they remove addons).

>>61538974
you're wasting your life posting awful baits on the internet

>>61538889
YES the tomfuckery is strong with this Opera shill.

Sjitt, this look boodyful

It was shit the last time you posted it Mr.Shill. I doubt it is any better now.

>>61538986

You're selling your life running proprietary software

>>61538950
This
Spectacle does the same and so much more

>>61538921
isn't there a chrome or firefox addon for that?

>>61538837
lol wtf is this slow shit? macOS has a shortcut for screenshots. Shift+Option+Command+4 lets you select whatever area you want and it automatically puts it on your clipboard so you can just paste the screenshot wherever you want.

>>61540187
I meant Shift+Control+Command+4

File: 200_s.gif (48KB, 354x200px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 354x200px

>>61538837
taking a screenshot of a picture KEK

so op, this webm shows me that it can take screenshots in a worse and less efficient way than I already can.
Why?