Which one?

>The QT license

Fucking kikes if I ever saw it.

Qt for c++
Gtk for c

They both kinda suck though

>>61531555
Qt is good but looks terrible on non-Qt DE's
GTK is 'ight but looks like shit on Windows and macOS

Qt 4.8

qt5 = gtk2 > gtk3

Gtk since it supports Emacs keybindings in text boxes.

>>61531555
While GTK is generally easier to use and has more widespread language support, it tries to force some sort of pseudo-object oriented syntax into it's C codebase that is absolutely disgusting. The licencing of Qt can be a bit of a problem, but if you're using it professionally just pay the damn licence fee. If you know how to program well enough to use it, you capable of making enough money to purchase it.

File: 1452364212791.jpg (8KB, 215x234px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 215x234px

>>61532496
>qt5 = gtk2

>>61533261
I've always heard Qt is easier to use