In WHAT situation would you need 144 virtual desktops!?

>>61516655
>"640 kB ought to be enough for anybody"
In what situation would you *ever* need more than 640k of RAM?

>>61516809
Even the most hardcore user can only make effective use of so many virtual desktops. The hardware could be there, the human brain would still struggle to keep up. Diminishing returns man.

>>61516809
to hold all these desktops

Occasionally, limited options are designed in such a way that the limit is way above what the average or any human is going to need or want. This is good, because it makes sure that most or all people are satisfied, while you don't necessarily have to create a complicated functionality for handling a no-limit scenario (here dynamically loading and unloading an infinite amount of virtual desktops).

File: 2017-03-29 22-59-35.webm (3MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1920x1080px

>>61516655
Running 144 instances of Runescape using the random.dat trick.

2 words, Indian Scammers

>>61516970
Just because you cant think of the situation doesnt mean its not a possibility.

>>61518434
If you're running 144 instances of RS then you're botting and making absolute bank.

showroom streams.

>>61516655
in case of severe autism

>>61516809
To fit the entirety of this WebM
>>61518434
into main memory.

File: a.webm (527KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

527KB, 1920x1080px

>>61520108

>>61516655
>144 virtual desktops
>not running 144 concurrent Virtual Machines

The same reason why I apparently need to have 10000 tabs open. Because I can

>>61519750
RuneScape botting isn't very profitable.

RS3 gold is 15 cents/mil.
OSRS has fallen below $1/m.