Intel Atom Processors

>>61512873
Everything.

>>61512939

Explain.

>>61512873
ARM ate them.

Intel out-jewed themselves with their market segmentation

>>61512873
Nothing, the latest ones were great.

My z3735f netbook gives me competitive battery life to a macbook or any other high end laptop with a big battery while being thinner and more portable. And it's only a bay trail. Cherry trail was even better.

Good enough for studying, watching movies, web browsing, etc, light multitasking. It was the perfect uni laptop for me.

>>61512873
what is wrong with trash?
oh i dont know anon
why dont you tell me?

>>61512873
Is laptop Pentium like a high wattage dual core?

>>61512873
CISC

>>61513452
Pentium was the shit back in the day.

I think Intel missed a design flaw in the c2000 line and it is dying in the field. I heard Intel fired the entire department responsible for validating it. So the c3000 is late.

Atoms look great imho. Want to get my hands on a fast x86 raspberry pi scale machine with ecc and passive cooling.

>>61513238

It wasn't until a few years ago that they actually had out-of-order execution, even...

>>61515741
It is/was an open question of how do you actually make a power efficient x86. Pure in order is a logical first guess.

>>61512873
its intel but slower than usual.

File: Intel_Atom_Shitposting Station.png (19KB, 468x479px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 468x479px

>>61512873

There's nothing wrong with them desu. They make excellent little shitposting stations. I got pic related for $78 on ebay and it's going strong for Netflix, 4chan, online shopping, and even some light exel. Battery life even on a heavily used 2+ yr old machine is still about 7 hrs.

Why are you hating on the processor?

File: IMG_20170722_203924.jpg (2MB, 4160x3120px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4160x3120px

>>61515862

>pic related for $78

>>61512873

qualcucked

>>61512873
>What went wrong?
Mostly 2g of ram and some in 32bits when mostly was 64bits

>>61515862
>x86 Windows on a x64 machine.

WHY DO FUCKING RETARDED MANUFACTURES DO THIS SHIT?

>>61517698
Cause atom lacks few instructions to support x64 WindowsTM

>>61517698
Do you mean 32bit Windows on a 64 bit machine.

Yeah my first laptop I bought with my own money was an asus and it had 32bit Windows pre installed. I only found out when I upped the ram

It had something to do with the video card drivers desu

I installed win7 64 and literally the video card drivers for win 64 did not exist nor were the win 32 ones compatible - yeah it's a fuck - no problems with 64bit Linux though ! It's what pushed me to give kubuntu a go 10 years ago...