What kind of overclock are you running, /g/?

>that single and multi thread performance
girlslaughing.jpg

>>61510062
Q6600 at 3.2, 1600mhz FSB
i7 4790k, 4.750GHZ not a great overclocker compared to my 4770k but it has vt-d

File: 1422128641005.jpg (222KB, 1278x1181px) Image search: [Google]

222KB, 1278x1181px

>>61510062
>1.48v

File: CPU-Z.png (60KB, 417x414px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 417x414px

it's a modest OC, sadly, I can't do much more without a large increase in voltage. Oh, and temps. On 4.5GHz it easily spiked into 100+ celsius.

I may have lost the silicon lottery but I'm not complaining about this CPU.

>>61510239
The 4790K I had wouldn't do anything over 4.6 fully stable, so at least it's better than that.

>>61510350
Six years and we still here, nigga.

>>61510511
Kind of a dud. Most 3770Ks can do around 4.5GHz before temperatures get out of control. You should delid it.

File: cpuz_2017-07-22_16-15-00.png (29KB, 403x407px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 403x407px

>>61510062

>>61510062
>Intel
>1.48V

You like to live dangerously don't you?
Show temps under lead

>>61510062
There's no way that's stable

>>61510566
>You should delid it.
kinda scared to do that, but everytime I attemped to do so, my motivation withered away the moment I opened the case and remembered that I'd have to dissasemble cooling. Too much bother when all I do with it is shitposting, listening to music and playing a gaym on occasion.

>>61510694
Voltage seems kinda high for 4.4. I can do 4.6 at that voltage.

>>61510711
I'm phoneposting at the moment, but mid-70s under 100% non-AVX load. Maybe it'd explode instantly with AVX, but I don't care because nothing I use uses it. Sandy Bridge can handle a bit more voltage than newer Intel chips. Intel's own max recommended voltage for the 2600K is 1.52V.

>>61510735
Fair enough. You should do it one day though, just for funsies.

>>61510511
You think its worth me upgrading my 3570k to a 3770k, just for general use?

>>61511156
if you were to pay a typical amount of money for it then not really. You're only missing out on some cache and HT.

you better invest into some ryzen 5 instead of getting a gimped 4 core from 2012.

>>61510062
um.. there must be something wrong with the scores

even my bulldozer makes 1200 single thread

>>61511222
that is the old CPU-Z the new one gimps AMD CPU's because they were winning,

4670k @ 4.6 dh14 cooler. I just set the auto oc function on. No idea about volt but the cpu runs in the 60s when I gaym. So it's all good.

>>61511222
what version CPU-Z are you running?

>>61511241
Your single thread performance seems lower than it should be. I get 457 with a 2600K at 4.6GHz. A 3770K with higher IPC and clocked 100MHz higher shouldn't be scoring lower.

Should I even touch the clocks on my i5 750 with the stock cooler? Just cleaned out my case and reapplied some thermal paste. It was due for a cleaning and now isn't throttling anymore, but the stock clocks are like 2.66ghz.

>>61512096
You should be able to get it to about 3.5GHz on the stock cooler. They had a copper slug in those days, so were better than the absolute trash stock coolers Intel provides today.

>>61511156
Absolutely not unless you get it for almost nothing.

>>61511156
If its under $100, otherwise, Ryzen would be better investment. 3770K route is a deadend. Ryzen IPC already surpasses 3XXXK

>>61510062
i5 4670k at 4.0GHZ also got my 2560x1440 running at 80Hz and 1920x1080 at 100Hz, RX 480 is 1500mhz core clock and 2200 memory clock.

i7-920 at 3.85ghz with 1.375v.

Pretty lame, I need more single thread performance if I ever want to emulate PS3 or WiiU.

Might pick up a 32nm Westmere Xeon from China and overclock that to 4.2ghz+, probably still not going to be enough though.

i7 2700K 5.2GHz
i5 4690K 4.6GHz
i5 i5 3317U downclocked to 800MHz-1700MHz (used to OC itself to 2.6GHz but it got hot and it's fast enough for what I use it for at the stock and bellow.

File: 1483670126214.gif (649KB, 540x300px) Image search: [Google]

649KB, 540x300px

>>61511241
>100C on some cores

File: 1485199115282.jpg (55KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 1280x720px

>>61511241
For god's sake, man just delid this

File: core2quad a cute.png (25KB, 402x376px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 402x376px

Sadly it becomes unstable at 3.6Ghz, but it still does everything I need it to.

>>61512839
Get a Xeon in there bruz, ebay/china.

File: turnip.png (34KB, 417x413px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 417x413px

Only thing changed here is the multiplier.

>>61513014
That was plan A, but there were no $20 xeons being sold when I upgraded, so I decided to cheap out. Don't really need a bigger cache so I don't much care either.

File: specc.png (72KB, 1002x769px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 1002x769px

Wasn't able to get this stable at 4.7 before with speedstep/c-states, but I saw that one of the recent bios updates made some adjustments to vcore, so I gave it a shot and sure enough I can do it now.

File: 1488205548819.jpg (100KB, 873x700px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 873x700px

Is Lga 2011 v-3 worth it ? Or should I get ryzen/ 7700k?

>all these retarded overclocks
I bet they don't even pass FMA3/AVX2 burns, or they downclock while you stress test them with those instructions sets.

File: cpu list.png (144KB, 1574x404px) Image search: [Google]

144KB, 1574x404px

My builds across a decade.
Q9400 ran to a wall with board having no PCI locks and lost SATA devices after 400MHz BCLK
3570K with basic "tightening the nut&screws" type OC.
6300HQ is undervolted by 140mV since it is a laptop with locked chip
Current 1600X ran at around 3.975GHz 1.375V, but bios updates caused unstability (propably due to better hardware ulitization) and I lowered the OC multiplier to 3.95GHz. Ram is G.Skill Ripjaws V Black 3200MHz (Hynix chips) at 2933MHz 15-15-15-35 1T

R8 H8 Mastrub8.

>>61514171
For pure gaming i7 7700K is the best, but Ryzen 5 1600 is the best value for gaming with 1400 1500X for lower budgets and 1600X if discounted.

LGA 2011 v-3 is good only if you want it for production workloads but you can get AMD system cheaper for that with a Ryzen 5 1600 or Ryzen 7 1700 and get better bang for your buck.

Generally speaking, going with AMD platform lets you spend more money on videocard which is most likely the limiting factor in videogames, and I would rather get something like 1500X and a GTX 1070 than 7700K and
GTX 1060

>>61514379
Why would anybody give a shit if it's stable in their actual workloads?

>Lower your performance in the real world so you can pass six weeks of this pointless artificial stress test!

No thanks.

>>61514386
Damn, too bad about that q9400. I had mine at 3.6 stable. Great CPU.

>>61510511
name of the skin you are using please

What is this disgusting Intel thread?

Get off my board you normies. REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!

>>61510062
7700k @5.1ghz

File: newcpuz.png (48KB, 803x398px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 803x398px

>>61510062
>>61510511
>>61510694
>>61511241
>>61513802
>>61514386
whadap 1155