worst and best distros

>>61436913
Worst: Gentoo
Best: Solus
>inb4: muh memes

>>61436928
And yes, I cannot count from 1 to 5.
t. Gentoo user

>>61436913
I expect you'll be gathering this data to create a /g/-approved distro ranking

Worst: *
Best: Gentoo

>>61436942
that will be depending on you guys. give me enough info as of why that or this distro is the best/worst and i may do a little tier list.

>>61436913
>Sourcemage

>>61436913
worst: manjaro
best: linux from scratch

install gentoo

>>61436913
worst:
ubuntu
mandrake
fedora core 2-5 (didn't use any newer versions)
suse 8, 9, 10 (didn't use any newer versions)

best:
rhel 9
centos 5-7
debian 3.1-9

File: 1500324935950.gif (2MB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 300x300px

>>61437526
>worst: manjaro

w-why ;_;

>>61436913
worst :
1. gentoo
2. *buntu
3. deepin
4. zorin
5. elementary

best: my distribution
worst: your distribution

>>61436913
>patrician tier
Slackware, Gentoo

>pretty damn good at what they do tier
Tails, Puppy, Lubuntu, Tomato by Shibby, Qubes, Lakka

>usable enough tier
Fedora, Ubuntu (minimal), Debian

>getting less usable
OpenSUSE, Trisquel

>pleb tier
Ubuntu

>should not have been left without parents' or tard wranglers' supervision
Arch, Mint

Worst: All GNUmale/Lincuck distros
Best: ChromeOS