give me legitimate reasons why you would need more than this

>>61411310
No.

>>61411310
you aren't a manchild and use your CPU for non-gaymen reasons such as compilation and virtualization

File: 1413922106750.jpg (109KB, 800x1000px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 800x1000px

>>61411310
because more coars
especially since you can actually make use of them these days

wherein OP defines "legitimate" to mean "only what I personally approve of"

and is also a faggot

Thats not the one you're looking for it's the 2500 model you need.

File: Screenshot_20170716_192359.png (64KB, 317x149px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 317x149px

What did they mean by this?

File: AMD_Athlon_XP_2800.jpg (1MB, 2816x2112px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2816x2112px

give me legitimate reasons why you would need more than this

>muh games
fuck off kiddos

>muh rendering
>muh data analysis
>muh CAD
outsource that shit to the cloud nigger

>muh multitasking
your brain can't process more than 24FPS or more than two programs

>>61411511
guaranteed (You)

>>61411310
—More cores
—More efficient cores
—New feature extensions
—Support for faster RAM
—Support for newer chipsets

Need I go on?

Machine "learning" memery cause I'm too stupid to use cuda/opencl, but smart enough to use a threadpool.

>>61411310
CPU's always get better.

That said, I have that chip with a closed loop watercooler and it has been running at 4.4 pretty much nonstop since >2011 with no issues

>>61411511
wow that thing has like 11 cores

File: jogando fallout na excelencia.jpg (72KB, 960x720px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 960x720px

>before AMD Ryzen
No.
>after AMD Ryzen
Yes.

>>61411310
Matlab

File: unity-icon-big.jpg (9KB, 300x195px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 300x195px

>>61411310
because programmers are going to keep getting lazier and software is going to keep getting more poorly optimized forever.

File: 1483501085976.jpg (21KB, 400x300px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 400x300px

>>61411511

>>61411384
I don't get this picture, hyperthreading was a legitimately good development for Intel and Nehelem and Westmere were very competitive against the Phenom II. Not to mention Sandy Bridge of course BTFOing Bulldozer.

>>61414351
Bulldozer wasn't a bad product, but AMD needed a LOT more marketshare before throwing their weight around, creating a crazy novel architecture and telling the community to "optimize for this, bitch!"

because its 6 years old and I need cores for virtualization

>>61411310
So I don't have to close one application to run another to prevent unwanted performance hits.

>>61411310
Because the chipset is fucking ancient.

>>61411310
Because the R5 1600 exists