Photobucket Schaudenfreude

>>61400700
>imageshack from 2007 still work.
I highly doubt it because they sent me notification of that they are deleteing all my pics if I am not paying them.

>>61400700
I couldn't believe how many people actually made a free-tier third party image host an essential part of their own business, e.g. an independent online shop/ebay.
This is just stupid and short-sighted imho.

>>61400700
>not using your own colo server or VPS or even cellar-dweller server

Pleb tier.

>>61400851
amen sister.

>>61400851
>using your own resources like a cuck

all these super smart people at private trackers that use imgur etc will be FUMING when they go down.

Should've used an internal image service instead

>>61400851
Unless you're dug into your living situation like a tick, a good free hosting site will outlast a cellar dweller. The other two options cost money.

>>61400894
That said, images are really quite unnecessary for a private tracker, aren't they?

>>61400916
except they aren't dipshit

I browse private trackers through a GUI, not fucking Terminal

>>61401047
>I browse private trackers through a GUI, not fucking Terminal

AOL: the post

>not using tinypic
My pics from 2007 are all still there

>>61403545

Photobucket owns Tinypic you dipshit.

imgur is shit too, dumbass.

This is what plebs get for using a "free" image hosting service instead of having your own server to host images on.

>>61400906
What is a domain name for $500? Even a free no-ip? My server has moved twice in the last 10 years and all my images are still hosted at the same domain.