Speccy thread?

File: specccs.png (105KB, 808x633px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 808x633px

bump

File: Current Desktop Specs.png (73KB, 872x759px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 872x759px

This thread needs more storage devices

File: Dell optiplex GX270 specs.jpg (163KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

163KB, 1920x1080px

Shitposting machine

I seem to remember like 5 years ago people on /g/ saying not to use speccy for some reason. Does anyone remember what that reason was?

File: ss (2016-12-10 at 04.23.52).png (71KB, 787x523px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 787x523px

>>61397474
Ayy I remember you.

>>61397716
?

>>61397483
It's crap.

>>61396387
Summary
Operating System
Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
CPU
Intel Core i5 4670K @ 3.40GHz 56 °C
Haswell 22nm Technology
RAM
16.0GB Dual-Channel DDR3 @ 934MHz (11-13-13-33)
Motherboard
ASRock Z87M Extreme4 (CPUSocket) 43 °C
Graphics
SONY TV *00 (3840x2160@59Hz)
4096MB ATI Radeon RX 470 Graphics (ASUStek Computer Inc) 49 °C
Storage
119GB SAMSUNG MZ7LN128HCHP-000H1 (SSD) 39 °C
1863GB Hitachi HUA722020ALA330 45W6276 59Y1813IBM (SATA) 47 °C
1863GB Hitachi HUA722020ALA331 (SATA) 50 °C
1863GB Hitachi HUA722020ALA331 (SATA) 45 °C
931GB Western Digital WDC WD10 EZEX-08M2NA0 SCSI Disk Device (USB (SATA)) 35 °C
1863GB Hitachi HUA722020ALA331 USB Device (SSD) 39 °C
1863GB Hitachi HUA722020ALA331 USB Device (SSD) 39 °C
Optical Drives
No optical disk drives detected
Audio
AMD High Definition Audio Device

>>61398803
lol just post a pic

File: Screenshot_3.png (32KB, 736x465px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 736x465px

dddddd

File: IMG_3913.png (72KB, 772x594px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 772x594px

I freak out when it breaks 40c under load. Am I an autist?

>>61398829
wait where did my 8gb disappear

>>61397201
I was going to congrat you on passing the wincuck test.
But I saw AMD.

File: caapture.png (147KB, 1017x656px) Image search: [Google]

147KB, 1017x656px

>>61396387
h8

>>61398832
verifiably

>>61398832
You are a fucking pussy.
Average gamer wincuck who has to keep checking their temp even though the parts support up to 90 Degrees.

>>61398879
>>61398883
Good to know. I'll go back to my gayming now.

>>61398871
>>>/v/

File: drives.png (44KB, 742x577px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 742x577px

>>61397474
Why have several smaller drives when you can have fewer larger drives?

Also, please post your CrystalDiskInfo of those drives. Those seagates have to be near death.

File: 7deeabf05c[1].png (36KB, 650x555px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 650x555px

>>61396387
I use this mostly for shit posting... What a waste.

>>61397644
>16.0GB Single-Channel

?

>>61397561
Are you running the beta AGESA bios? That would help you with your ram speed. I've got a 3200 kit running at 3466 stable on my crosshair vi hero.

File: seagate 1.png (112KB, 994x852px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 994x852px

>>61399113
Here is one of the seagates info,i'll post the other in a bit, too lazy to get the other drive's info.

File: seagate 2.png (112KB, 1007x854px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 1007x854px

>>61399113
Here is the other one.

File: cdi.png (59KB, 674x532px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 674x532px

>>61399179
Thanks. Guess they really did improve.

File: Speccy.jpg (57KB, 660x474px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 660x474px

Here's mine. Gonna be swtiching to Vega as soon as its safe to do so.

File: murasame.png (41KB, 730x542px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 730x542px

>>61396387

>>61399234
>amd rig
>intel ssd

You dun goofed.

File: 2017-07-16-013741_1680x1050_scrot.png (148KB, 1319x993px) Image search: [Google]

148KB, 1319x993px

>>61396387
r8

>>61399250
kek. i got this ssd new off craigslist for $40 back in early 2015.

>>61399252
grep/10

>>61399149
Wanna sell me your GPU then?

File: AA78_by_Zdzislaw_Beksinski_1978.jpg (1MB, 1327x1333px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1327x1333px

>>61397474
what on earth does your setup look like with all of those damn monitors?

>>61397482
that's a lot of ram for a pentium 4 what configuration is it? vram is big too. nice.

>>61397531
good set of parts

>>61397541
modern games don't run too well for you, do they?

>>61397561
>1600X with a 4GB R9
I hope that was just an old component you had around

>>61397634
I bet this build wasn't cheap

>>61397644
>16GB single channel
>7700HQ paired with a GTX 1050
is this a prebuilt or something? what's up?

>>61397716
old server desktop off of ebay?

>>61397807
respect

>>61397886
I bet this machine is still pretty quick

>>61398775
how are you SLIing a 1060 3GB with a 1080 ti???? I don't even think 1060's can SLI.

>>61398829
what is this build for? nice dual cpu.

>>61398832
40c is fine. when your game starts to stutter, that would be a sign of the cpu throttling to keep itself from getting too hot. if you are not thermal throttling, your temperatures are ok.

>>61398871
quick machine, but at a high dolla

>>61399113
>R9 with ryzen 1700
you're hoeing that 1700 with that video card. Consider saving up and pick up a GTX 1080 Ti

>>61399227
did you just pick up that 1060? if you already spent the money on that card, at least use it for another two years or something.
>hurr durr gotta stay with the expensive trends

>>61399234
that video card is bottlenecking hard, consider an upgrade!

>>61399252
core 2 quad respect
1680x1050 respect
I feel like this is the 2007 machine of the year

>>61399495
>>R9 with ryzen 1700
>you're hoeing that 1700 with that video card. Consider saving up and pick up a GTX 1080 Ti


1. You spelled RX Vega wrong
2. R9 fury (x/nano) are amd's best flagships atm.

>>61399495
Nope, not thermal throttling, just went full autist and filled all fan ports with 140mms and set a straight through cooling option.

>>61399495
I've had the 1060 for about a year. My brother wants to buy it and I have reason to get a card more suited to my resolution.

>>61399581
>unironically thinking RX Vega will come close to the 1080 ti
dreaming

>>61399802
Don't mind if I borrow your cystal ball?

File: speccyforpc.png (38KB, 760x544px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 760x544px

>>61396387
Does the job. Want a gpu upgrade but prices at the moment are massively inflated due to mining. GTX 1060 alone is around 500 dollars here in Australia. CPU is also starting to bottleneck, but am only running it at 3.7 ghz currently so have some headroom.

File: nice.png (36KB, 828x510px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 828x510px

neat they fixed memory and ryzen reporting in the new spooky.

File: sysinfo-capture-2017-7-16_@_10.51.png (32KB, 584x601px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 584x601px

Nothing too fancy desu family.

>>61400357
what r9 has 2 gb of vram ?

>>61400420
270x

>>61400433
that's a good card

>>61400440
Not anymore, you need at least 4gigs to keep up with modern games. It's still worth its money, but you won't be playing games past 2015 on high or ultra.

>>61400455
at least it's better than this:
https://www.techpowerup.com/gpudb/1865/firemv-2260-pcie-x1

File: SPECCY 2017-07.jpg (58KB, 756x561px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 756x561px

>>61396387
Summer temps

>>61400787
twtf is up with that Vram rating its so fucked up lol
bloody 32bit software sucks so much lol.

>>61400864
Yeah maybe piriform will update speccy at some point to fix this

>>61399495
No I do not SLI the 1060 with the 1080Ti. As you said, 1060 can't SLI. It's for PhysX and folding at home and other things.