Screenfetch / Neofetch Thread

File: screenFetch-2017-06-20_11-14-17.png (245KB, 1680x1050px) Image search: [Google]

245KB, 1680x1050px

>>61373126
r8 my autism

File: Screenshot_2017-07-14_00-29-29.png (1MB, 1680x1050px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1680x1050px

>>61373141
Stallman/10 very autismal

File: Bildschirmfoto vom 2017-07-14 19-04-50.png (79KB, 1023x570px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 1023x570px

Not as happy as with KDE Plasma. But gonna replace Budgie soon. Otherwise a great distro

File: 2017-07-14--17-58-32_1920x1080.png (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x1080px

hello

>>61373165
nice wp pls share

File: screenfetch.webm (557KB, 1280x800px) Image search: [Google]

557KB, 1280x800px

>>61373126
Hey!

>>61373359
Arch has the two usual problems: there's no clear policy about what software can be included, and nonfree blobs are shipped with their kernel, Linux. Arch also has no policy about not distributing nonfree software through their normal channels.
>>61373165
Ubuntu provides specific repositories of nonfree software, and Canonical expressly promotes and recommends nonfree software under the Ubuntu name in some of their distribution channels. Ubuntu offers the option to install only free packages, which means it also offers the option to install nonfree packages too. In addition, the version of Linux, the kernel, included in Ubuntu contains firmware blobs.

The “Ubuntu Software Center” lists proprietary programs and free programs jumbled together. It is hard to tell which ones are free since proprietary programs for download at no charge are labelled “free”.

Ubuntu appears to permit commercial redistribution of exact copies with the trademarks; removal of the trademarks is required only for modified versions. That is an acceptable policy for trademarks. The same page, further down, makes a vague and ominous statement about “Ubuntu patents,” without giving enough details to show whether that constitutes aggression or not.

That page spreads confusion by using the misleading term “intellectual property rights”, which falsely presumes that trademark law and patent law and several other laws belong in one single conceptual framework. Use of that term is harmful, without exception, so after making a reference to someone else's use of the term, we should always reject it. However, that is not a substantive issue about Ubuntu as a GNU/Linux distribution.
>>61373126
Mint does not have a policy against including nonfree software, it includes nonfree binary blobs in drivers packaged with the kernel, and it includes nonfree programs in its repositories. It even includes proprietary codecs.
>>61373308
Theres is nothing about solus but it promotes non-free software.

>>61373448
FreeBSD, NetBSD, and OpenBSD all include instructions for obtaining nonfree programs in their ports system. In addition, their kernels include nonfree firmware blobs.

Nonfree firmware programs used with Linux, the kernel, are called “blobs”, and that's how we use the term. In BSD parlance, the term “blob” means something else: a nonfree driver. OpenBSD and perhaps other BSD distributions (called “projects” by BSD developers) have the policy of not including those. That is the right policy, as regards drivers; but when the developers say these distributions “contain no blobs”, it causes a misunderstanding. They are not talking about firmware blobs.

No BSD distribution has policies against proprietary binary-only firmware that might be loaded even by free drivers.

File: lol.png (321KB, 608x370px) Image search: [Google]

321KB, 608x370px

>>61373487
I used the -h option muhhahahaha

File: lamo.png (348KB, 608x401px) Image search: [Google]

348KB, 608x401px

>>61373522
and then used the -D option

>>61373308
> fish
my nigguh

File: Desktop 03-02-2017 2.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

>>61373141
feels free man

>>61373359
man_of_culture.jpg

>>61373867
Fedora does have a clear policy about what can be included in the distribution, and it seems to be followed carefully. The policy requires that most software and all fonts be available under a free license, but makes an exception for certain kinds of nonfree firmware. Unfortunately, the decision to allow that firmware in the policy keeps Fedora from meeting the free system distribution guidelines.

>>61373873
what distro des meet the free system guidlines?

>>61373910
Trisquel, Parabola (>>61373141) and a few other small distros.

File: Screen Shot 2017-07-14 at 12.58.11 PM.png (39KB, 474x236px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 474x236px

>>61373126
Functionality > freedumbs

>>61373435
>you need to protect users from themselves in order to make sure they are free.
Sounds like a commie

File: screenFetch-2017-07-15_02-01-19.png (435KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

435KB, 1366x768px

just very recently switched to xfce, my goodness am i enlightened. mate on stretch is bloatfest. another good thing is they finally changed the default screensaver, god the jessie one was awful

>>61373997
You can still download non-free binarys and stuff but this just makes sure your distro doesn't promote them. Its like if you quit smoking and your freind says: "I'm not going to stop you from buying cigarettes but I won't give you a cigarettes or anything like that"

>>61374039
Debian's Social Contract states the goal of making Debian entirely free software, and Debian conscientiously keeps nonfree software out of the official Debian system. However, Debian also provides a repository of nonfree software. According to the project, this software is “not part of the Debian system,” but the repository is hosted on many of the project's main servers, and people can readily find these nonfree packages by browsing Debian's online package database and its wiki.

There is also a “contrib” repository; its packages are free, but some of them exist to load separately distributed proprietary programs. This too is not thoroughly separated from the main Debian distribution.

Previous releases of Debian included nonfree blobs with Linux, the kernel. With the release of Debian 6.0 (“squeeze”) in February 2011, these blobs have been moved out of the main distribution to separate packages in the nonfree repository. However, the problem partly remains: the installer in some cases recommends these nonfree firmware files for the peripherals on the machine.

Debian's wiki includes pages about installing nonfree firmware.

>>61373938
>Trisquel
so which distro doesen't promote non-free software? As I am aware of there is no free wifi driver for my wlan card. Its an iwlwifi

File: 1493658402135.jpg (95KB, 365x1009px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 365x1009px

>>61374061
>>Debian's Social Contract states the goal of making Debian entirely free software, and Debian conscientiously keeps nonfree software out of the official Debian system. However, Debian also provides a repository of nonfree software. According to the project, this software is “not part of the Debian system,” but the repository is hosted on many of the project's main servers, and people can readily find these nonfree packages by browsing Debian's online package database and its wiki.
>
>There is also a “contrib” repository; its packages are free, but some of them exist to load separately distributed proprietary programs. This too is not thoroughly separated from the main Debian distribution.
>
>Previous releases of Debian included nonfree blobs with Linux, the kernel. With the release of Debian 6.0 (“squeeze”) in February 2011, these blobs have been moved out of the main distribution to separate packages in the nonfree repository. However, the problem partly remains: the installer in some cases recommends these nonfree firmware files for the peripherals on the machine.
>
>Debian's wiki includes pages about installing nonfree firmware.
what did he mean by this ??? ??

>>61374069
Buy an atheros card

>>61374069
These one's don't have any non-free software and don't promote non-free software. However most of them are shit.
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-distros.html

>>61374243
>cancerscript

>>61373867
eroidesu

File: eazy-breezy-covergirl (male).png (296KB, 1556x962px) Image search: [Google]

296KB, 1556x962px

>>61373981
I'm like you but big

File: wall2.jpg (532KB, 1680x1050px) Image search: [Google]

532KB, 1680x1050px

>>61373376
Late reply, but here. My apologies!

>>61373435
Ubuntu derivatives like Ubuntu and Xubuntu have the option to only install free software upon install, and software from the software center takes a second to look up the license of if the software center itself is being dubious about it.

>>61373867
What's your fps in dota?

File: Zrzut ekranu 2017-07-14 o 19.30.42 (2).jpg (3MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3840x2160px

4K mustard rice

>>61374559
comfy

File: xyz.png (122KB, 1600x900px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 1600x900px

>>61373126

>>61374039
wallpaper pls

File: 1500033776268.png (370KB, 570x1000px) Image search: [Google]

370KB, 570x1000px

>>61374983
give me something of equal value first

File: fetch.png (65KB, 711x343px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 711x343px

>>61373126

File: scrot2.png (803KB, 1280x800px) Image search: [Google]

803KB, 1280x800px

>>61373981
>tfw you have both
Feels good

File: 4_5953997571989962947.png (2MB, 1680x1050px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1680x1050px

Hai!!

>>61375283
You fucked up your fonts m8

>>61375283
what awful font choice

>>61375283
Disgusting font desu

File: Screenshot_20170714_214343.png (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x1080px

does this count as severe autism?

>>61375310
how did u display anime girl instead of distro logo in your screenfetch

>>61375462
>how do i read neofetch wiki

File: clean.png (1MB, 2880x1800px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2880x1800px

i quite like having borders, i dont get the obsession with removing them

>>61375462
I recompiled the whole distro to replace the logo

>>61374104
>one's

File: scrot3.png (831KB, 1280x800px) Image search: [Google]

831KB, 1280x800px

>>61375318
>>61375321
>>61375333
o-okay

>>61375605
thx anon

>>61375605
with gratitude!

File: crop-2017-07-14-22:01:36_1920x1080_scrot.png (440KB, 1536x864px) Image search: [Google]

440KB, 1536x864px

Not even screenfetch needed for filler

>>61375373
OwO

File: screenfetch_14_7_17.jpg (1MB, 1440x858px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1440x858px

P-Please no bully

File: illya 36.png (2MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3840x2160px

>>61375036
Here.

>>61375785
nice pape, mind sharing?

File: 1493493877571.png (453KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

453KB, 1920x1080px

>>61375871

File: 1486748863250.jpg (300KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

300KB, 1920x1080px

>>61375894
Here have the orginal or you want my gimped version

File: IMG_2699.png (4MB, 1536x2048px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 1536x2048px

I'm on my iPad right now

>>61375927
gimped please

File: 2017-07-08-215448_1365x744_scrot.png (460KB, 1365x744px) Image search: [Google]

460KB, 1365x744px

>screenfetch
>neofetch

File: comfyfetch.png (90KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 1366x768px

I once saw someone rice his desktop like this and thought it was autism.

Now I have never been /comfy/er

File: 1486748863250.jpg (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x1080px

>>61375933

>>61375953
how long did it take to rice?

File: 1486748800119.png (547KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

547KB, 1920x1080px

>>61375933
I also have this

>>61375969
Maybe an hour or so, counting the shitposting. I just used Chicago95, then spent some time making the start menu work half-decently and trying to get the panel mostly right.

>>61375953
Just ditch those remaining disgusting FOSS fonts for the real ones and it'll be perfect.

>>61376012
The shell font is a recreation of the real one, do you mean the other UI fonts?

File: Screen.png (378KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

378KB, 1920x1080px

>>61376054

Whoops I think Wayland ate Scrot

File: BlackTwo.png (778KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

778KB, 1920x1080px

>>61375985
http://kuvshinov-ilya.tumblr.com/archive

how can 4chan even compete with tumblr

File: neofetch-2017-07-14-01-47-40-22285.png (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x1080px

What's a good small/tiny terminal size to make it look good without taking up so much space?

>>61376271

Pls give wallpaper

File: neofetch-2017-07-15-04-52-09-24973.png (467KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

467KB, 1366x768px

i had some trouble with thumbnails but i am officially part of the cool desktopers now

>>61376356
>61376271

HURRY UP...when did 4chan get so slow

File: for_the_flying_types_by_lynxgriffin-d61i0pz-200x110.jpg (8KB, 200x110px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 200x110px

>>61376420

>>61376434

Finally...thanks

>>61376434
>>61376444

HEY WAIT A SEC

File: screenFetch-2017-07-14_23-02-52.png (3MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1920x1080px

>>61373126
haters gonna hate

File: low.screenFetch-2017-07-13_13-38-02.png.jpg (335KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

335KB, 1920x1080px

like this

>>61374331
owo>>61375263
nice
>>61375373
uwu>>61375953
owo

File: isac's fourth pc.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

>>61373126

>>61373141
Zenburn?

>>61374049
No. It's like your friend won't say shit.

File: 1499944360010.png (224KB, 782x639px) Image search: [Google]

224KB, 782x639px

>>61376506
>see a you
>it's literally "owo"

File: egoist_fallen.png (2MB, 1024x1280px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1024x1280px

>>61374406
Pretty good. I haven't actually measured it but it stays >60 with everything on max settings. I think its actually better than Windows.

File: Naganohara Mio Third Folder 124.jpg (74KB, 600x800px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 600x800px

>>61376696
don't expect any free (You)'s in the future

>>61373359
did you cat /dev/urandom to make it seem like you're doing something? just use dmesg or something my nigga

File: 1496404935780.jpg (231KB, 640x1920px) Image search: [Google]

231KB, 640x1920px

>>61376742
>he says as he gives me a free (You)

File: qt saber.png (555KB, 635x560px) Image search: [Google]

555KB, 635x560px

>>61374276
>eroidesu
ty

File: grill.png (554KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

554KB, 1920x1080px

>>61375927
>original
no

File: Screen Shot 2017-06-14 at 4.08.02 AM.png (2MB, 1440x900px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1440x900px

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TrOv7qHgo3k

>>61376782
Cute saber

>>61376907
Made me want to do some clogging bud.

File: screenfet.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

Rate my garbage

>>61377076
Post wallpaper

>>61377076
CPU temperature is impressively low

>>61377076
>fish

File: 2017-07-14-165700_3840x2160_scrot.png (2MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3840x2160px

Hi is this the desktop thread?

>>61377076
This >>61377298 anon is right. Absolutely disgusting.

File: Screenshot at 2017-07-15 01-15-07.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

r8 my shit taste

File: download.png (1KB, 211x140px) Image search: [Google]

1KB, 211x140px

>>61375931
Good for you, faggot

>>61376769

head -c3000 /dev/urandom

is much cooler and represents a thorough understanding of the GNU+Linux environment

>>61378028
also the slice of window space i had left after the amine pics was to small to fit a general code file comfortably

File: Screenshot_20170714_175335.png (373KB, 3120x1050px) Image search: [Google]

373KB, 3120x1050px

Fucking akregator doesn't work when I have the menu bar moved to a panel so I had to disable it, if you're wondering what that warning triangle was

File: botnet.png (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x1080px

fite me freetards