ITS GLUE
GLUEEEEE
GLEUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUAVASBUGFSAZUFAS
>Intel getting wrecked by mere glue
>>61369684
Glue bathed in blood.
>mfw Intel gets rekt by poo in loo's
>mfw Intel gets rekt by a woman CEO
>mfw Intel gets rekt by Super-Glue
>mfw Intel gets rekt by CONTRACT KELLER
>mfw Intel gets rekt by 260 million Dollars R&D vs 12B from Intel
>mfw Intel gets rekt by price/performance ratio
>mfw Intel gets rekt by performance/watt ration
>mfw Intel gets rekt by ARM/Microsoft threatens to sue them too
>mfw Intel gets rekt by THEIR OWN FUCKING MAYO-TIM
also: very nice Die Shot
>>61369684
>not using silicon interposer for mcms in 2017
>no 8 socket EPYC motherboards (phyiscal space isn't free)
>still no support for transactional memory
>>61370527
>not using silicon interposer for mcms in 2017
would fuck with thermals and give marginal latency improvements
>no 8 socket EPYC motherboards (phyiscal space isn't free)
>unironically caring about something that comprises less than 1% of the market
>>61369684
Never thought that Google maps had night vision mode
>>61369684
>>61369715
you know i find it pretty ironic that intel is complaining about glue when they, themselves, were the first to glue cpu's together. the first dual cores from intel, the pentium d's, where just two pentium 4 house fire editions glued together.
with the core series, all the core 2 quads where two quads cores glued together. intel too faced the same latency problem as amd as well when those glued cpu's went to talk to each other. granted amd's infinity fabric provides much more bandwidth for that crosstalk.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=112&v=ZlklE7_Vv2A
BOY TR SUPPORTS EVEN LR-DIMMS.
>>61373517
POWER5 was even earlier.
>>61369684