>this is the future of Amerifats internet

>this is what redditors unironically believe

>>61351470
Propaganda at its best.

>>61351431
Still better then the government censoring the internet.

Netneutrality is a scam, if you care about freedom you have to reject it.

>>61351431
>Amerifats

Annnnd number of fucks given = 0.

>>61351431
>burgers will defend this

File: onsokumaru_and_shinobu_by_usvax1-d583lua.png (47KB, 220x221px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 220x221px

>>61351487

>>61351431
Good. The more retarded burgers this keeps off the internet the better. God I hope they'll charge a fuckton for Twitter access.

>>61351487
here is the way to freedumb
>>>/pol/

>>61351431
No, this isn't.
What will likely happen is near-uncapped data for Facebook and a few select paying companies, but a cap of 5GB for every non-paying website.

>>61351673
that would be a pr disaster you know?

First no competition, now no more internet for the poor, it was nice chatting to you murica, hope you get your everything together.

>>61351431
Most of them are likely too dumb to understand they're being fucked over.

>america
who cares

File: 1499207243599.png (483KB, 555x1191px) Image search: [Google]

483KB, 555x1191px

The majority of the world does not and has never had any net neutrality laws

Yet no website-package type things like that have ever existed anywhere, ever

Quality of service type traffic-prioritizing is an important part of any large network, especially an ISP, there is no actual legitimate reason why ISPs should be forced to treat all traffic equally

Net neutrality is basically just a leddit meme with no basis in reality, if you unironically support it you need to go back there

>>61351431
Why do you weeaboos insist on posting on a tech board?

>>61352679
>anime website
>complaining about anime

>>61352430
this
they hate any kind of freedom anyway

>>61351431
>Social media package
>$24/mo

>implying it's a bad thing

>>61352690
T E C H N O L O /G/ Y
B O A R D

>>61351431
Nothing wrong with capitalism. Don't like it? Don't buy it.

>>61351673
yes. Vodafone is testing this in europe

>>61351705
it's working

>>61352769
Eat shit.

File: 4chan.png (56KB, 1152x400px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 1152x400px

>>61352726
>t. newfag

>>61352767
>have to spending 6 trillion dollars to get into market
>people would pick old one than new

It's really a fair game, isn't it?

>>61352769
>yes. Vodafone is testing this in europe
It has been illegal in the European Union since last year

>>61351705
doesn't matter when you have a captive market

>>61352791
>t. Weeaboo paedophile

Social media is going to become a paid service?
How is this a bad thing?

>>61352855
Anime grills aren't illegal in my country :^)

>social media costs more
Sounds good to me.
Though this is over-exaggerated, like all the other alarmist net neutrality memes

>>61352461
net neutrality is one of the biggest issues of our time, and as an ameriburger you'd think you'd be supportive of a free and competitive market.

>>61351673
Making it even harder to break a market monopoly .
You know the thing that you should be able to do under capitalism.

>>61352701
>>61352430
Most sites are based in america.

Pretty sure you do not want them to die.

>>61352726
> implying lolis aren't technology

>>61352954
Most Muslims are too dumb to know.

>>61352954
Like Facebook and Google?

A man can only dream.

>>61352769
>vodafone
Nobody likes the brits

>>61352947
Uh, no? Capitalism is about the freedom of the free market. The invisible hand of God I mean money. If the free market allows you to become larger than most governments of the world, giving you enough money to strong-arm competitors out of the market and pay-off politicians to legislate against new competition arising, then that's just the free market at work. God bless capitalism, God bless Jesus, God bless Trump, Rest in peace Ronald Reagan and Richard Nixon, fuck Obama for putting fluoride in our water to control our minds and chemicals in the air to turn frogs into homosexuals, and nothing was fishy about 9/11 whatsoever.

>>61352826
well I guess vodafone is above the law I guess

>>61351431
thank fucking god, I don't want my 4yo posting dick pics on Facebook because somebody told him all the popular kids do it

>>61351491
amerifat detected

>>61352924
>not even a thing until 2010
>not even a normie issue until 2016
It's a false problem.

>>61351487
net neutrality is the government literally not being allowed to censor the internet you fool it means all data must get to its destination without being fucked with or slowed down

god does anyone actually look something up before bitching about it?

>>61351431
lying to push an agenda is never justified

go fuck yourself

>>61352679
>>61352726
>>61352855

SUPER FUCKING LATE TO THE PARTY. Holy shit this fucking cycle has restarted again.

READ THIS SummerFags: >>61352791

I support net neutrality

however I am against it if they will charge money for social media & nothing else

>>61352791
tfw I came here august 2004

>>61356483
It only prevents providers from discriminating

>>61356527

2 things

4chan is considered social media

chances they will charge per website are incredibly slim this is more about being able to charge netflix and the like to not be throttled this woulds be a non issue if IPSs where not allowed to hold a monopoly over an area even if one did people would just swap to the one that didnt unfortunately many are stuck with the choice of only one

I see this meme all the time but the reality would be a bit more sinister. You wouldn't get charged like this. ISP would get money from various websites. You will feel like you are paying the same for internet from ISPs but Netflix will have to ramp up it's prices. The evil money-grubbers will seem like the websites and not the ISPs

>Service you sell uses so much bandwidth it comprises a third of ALL internet traffic
>ISPs want you to pay them something to compensate for that
>WAAAAAAAAAH FACISTS FASCISTS YOU'RE ALL FASCISTS! IF WE DON'T PASS THIS BILL YOU'LL BAN EVERYTHING! ALL OF IT WILL GET BANNED WAAAAAH!
Netflix can go fuck itself.

>>61356483
>net neutrality is the government literally not being allowed to censor the internet
>I am fucking retarded
Net neutrality is about being able to classify ISPs as Title II communications carriers, which gives the government direct authority over what they can and cannot do, say, or show.
It's the same reason you cant swear on the radio, show tits on TV, or print obscenities in the paper.

>>61356635
this is incorrect net neutrality is about not letting the ISP charge netflix and similar companies more in order to access their customers the ISP is essentially trying to force netflix to charge cable prices so that more people will go back to cable TV we cannot allow this on demand is the future

>>61356635
It's already classed under Title 2, this whole bid of NN activism is to prevent it from being reclassed under Title 1, afaik.
To justify reclassification under Title 2, the internet had to be redesignated as a telecomms service.
> The term “telecommunications” means the transmission, between or among points specified by the user, of information of the user’s choosing, without change in the form or content of the information as sent and received.
>The term “telecommunications service” means the offering of telecommunications for a fee directly to the public, or to such classes of users as to be effectively available directly to the public, regardless of the facilities used
Now compare this to what it was designated as under Title 1, an information service.
>The term “information service” means the offering of a capability for generating, acquiring, storing, transforming, processing, retrieving, utilizing, or making available information via telecommunications, and includes electronic publishing, but does not include any use of any such capability for the management, control, or operation of a telecommunications system or the management of a telecommunications service
Now which one of these can you directly argue for things legal or consumer expectations of not throttling a web service (eg, DNS, netflix,...)? Hell, the telecomms layer of the internet is already secured under existing telecomms regulation.

>>61356619
>don't want people to pirate
>don't want people to netflix
Make up your damn mind, I want to watch a movie

>>61356787
want watch movie? buy cable piggu

>>61356829
I want to watch a movie, not 10 minutes of a movie and then 15 minutes of advertisement.

>>61356619
Suppose Nexflix doesn't exist and that all Internet traffic is diverse. Then won't the ISPs not have to support the same volume of traffic but be unable to charge any one entity in particular? What would they do?

>>61356926
to bad you buy cable or you no watch movie

>>61356705
Net neutrality isn't a thing, it's just a silly buzzword. What the government actually implemented is very different and is so dense you wouldn't sit down and read it all.

File: bbafter.png (127KB, 541x296px) Image search: [Google]

127KB, 541x296px

>>61356619
But the customers are already paying for the bandwidth dumbtard. Enjoy getting double-dipped

File: google.jpg (356KB, 1002x563px) Image search: [Google]

356KB, 1002x563px

>>61351482
>Net neutrality is propaganda

Why would anyone push an anti net neutrality agenda unless they worked for an IP? why would a consumer assume net neutrality is bad?

Not being rude just asking why you're so fucking stupid.

>>61357026
That's policy in general.

>>61352767
Oh yes, I love all the options I get where I live!
>AT&T DSL @ 12 mbit/s with a 300 gb data cap
>Cox Cable @ 30 mbit/s with a 1 tb data cap

Oh, and did I mention that neither of these had data caps last year, and Cox added their datacap a mere 3 months after AT&T added theirs?

>>61357071
You may be able to get DSL Extreme, without a data cap (they sell re-sold U-verse).

File: Flag_of_Canada.svg.png (18KB, 1280x640px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 1280x640px

Why not move to Canada?
>But, low data caps
Canada has real net neutrality. What's the point of higher data caps if you can't use the Internet for anything?

>>61351431

>social media

and nothing of value was lost.

>>61357071
Can't you just use 4G?

>>61356619
Yes, yes, Master I'll just buy the movie on Xfinity my apologies

>>61357246
Which is even more capped.

>>61357026
/thred
spam it relentlessly via psy op shill campaigns though, that'll show how stupid the sheeple really are.

>>61356962
Good point.

>>61357063
Because they read something on reddit that was saying net neutrality is good.
They are act like they are still in puberty: Against everything certain people say without a second thought.

>>61351431
I hope amerifats don't go that way.
Stay strong.

>>61357063
Because it gives more control to the federal government that they'll never let go of.

>>61356464
>problem is new so it's not a serious issue

Is this bait?

>>61357287

How did this meme start?
Is it just MSM propaganda?

>>61357246
Oh yes, I'd love to have a 10gb data cap with 8mbit/s!

And it's also more expensive!

>>61357367
>4G
>8 Mbps

I easily get 70, and 100+ in some areas.

Also no data cap (*), but then I am a European so I have evil evil net neutrality...


(* I do have to "buy" extra GB's after burning through 5GB in 24 hours, but they are completely free and just a measure to avoid abuse)

>>61357287
>It gives the government the ability to prevent IPs from fucking with connection speeds to specific addresses

What a crime.

>>61352461
>current state of /g/

>>61352461
india you pleb
has facebook for free but nout else wifi

>>61353103
Jesus this is some seriously repressed autism. You're a passive aggressive bitch, and in real life I'd slap you a few times just to watch you cry. Grow a fucking pair and argue actual points you fat piece of shit.

have the spam bots and shills actually managed to trick people into thinking net neutrality is some sort of trick and not a safeguard to protect the online free market from being controlled completely by isp's.

without net neutrality its pretty much a mafia demanding protecting money from sites or they will suffer a "bandwidth accident"

>>61357287
The government already has all these powers. We're not talking about giving anyone additional powers here.

File: americlap.jpg (164KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

164KB, 900x900px

br here
some months ago, our shitty ass government was colluding with isps (twice) to try to put retarded caps on our interwebs. we rioted and told them to get the fuck out. but, in the process of the whole thing, i remember muricans laughing and saying they were happy brs would be gone

to that, i say, get fucked, amerilards

>>61351705
Comcast, TWC and AT&T are already consistently ranked among the worst companies in America by public opinion and they don't give a fuck. When over 50% of America has no choice of ISP, why would they?

>>61352461
>The majority of the world does not and has never had any net neutrality laws

The majority of the world doesn't have ISP monopoly.

You fucking amerisharts ruined the internet. I'd take a leaf over an amerishart any day of the week.

>>61358165
except they do. anyone who is lucky to have more than one isp available where they live, even in big cities, is part of a lucky minority

Good I dont want stinky poo poo poor people on the internet

>>61357787
>wah wah i'll hit you!!!

Fucking americans.

>>61358260
t. 60%

>>61356483
>He thinks the FCC doesn't censor anything

>>61352690
If you are mature enough to post on /g/ you should have grown out of anime. Video games are bat enough, but at least they relate to technology.

Anime is always lagging behind in technology, the last anime i saw used worse CG than the last star fighter. Literally the first ever movie to use CG.

>>61353103
I love seeing a new copypasta in the wild

File: tumblr_oi6m7yXk5S1qav3uso1_540.gif (2MB, 540x304px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 540x304px

>>61358464
>what are Vocaloids
>what is Gatebox

>>61358844
>what is gatebox
BOTNET

>>61357522
>He trust idiots who can be lobbied into taxing the ever-loving fuck out of anything and everything
Why don't people just go through the courts to protect net-neutrality, not through our obviously corrupt Congress?