Firefox botnet

>>61334628
If you do something you need to hide, maybe you shouldn't do it

File: phishing.png (46KB, 470x543px)

46KB, 470x543px

Oh, it also refuses to fix a phishing issue for SJW reasons:

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1332714

>> We want every script and language to be treated equally on the Internet.

>>61334628
This is the last straw, swithcing browser right naw!
The only thing why i use firefox its because the skin app right now, the privacy meme died long ago and now this fsssss

>>61334628

>If we start putting restrictions on scripts which happen to look like Latin, such as Cyrillic, we are making that script a second-class citizen because not as much can be represented using it. If the Internet had started as a Russian invention, and Latin was late to the party, I think we'd be pretty annoyed at being treated that way. So I don't think we should treat Cyrillic that way.

>Gerv


Plis tell this is not the true status of Mozilla and he was expresing himself using a very conplex form of sarcasm

Glad I switched to Chromium.

>>61334628
>and disables addons so Privacy Badger or uMatrix can't block it.
uBlock works just fine on that page for me mate.

>>61334840
Hmm, looks like that indeed works. Weird. uMatrix and privacy badger don't seem to work for me.

>>61334910
Probably because those are shit normie-tier add-ons.

>>61334677
Then maybe you should post your bank account info. Since you have nothing to hide.

>>61334922
>umatrix
>more normie than ublock
wot

>>61334936
I don't invest in jews. I have everything in cash

>>61335104
Then why don't you tell me where you live? Surely you don't mind if someone visits.

File: 36363636546.png (40KB, 753x342px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 753x342px

>>61334910
umatrix works fine

File: Screen Shot 2017-07-12 at 7.14.21 AM.png (419KB, 3360x1940px) Image search: [Google]

419KB, 3360x1940px

>>61334628
It does a lot more than that, pic related is just from 1 hour from 1 device. Firefox constantly tries to ping home. And if you're not using a L7 firewall to block shit, you're doing it wrong.

>>61335117
Just ignore them it's probably just a bored /g/entleman being a contrarianfag for (you)s.

>>61335128
I don't see any google analytics there, despite seeing the network request to there in the inspector.

>>61335142
https://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/104628/what-is-the-purpose-of-getting-this-external-file

network.captive-portal-service.enabled set to false

>>61335117
Until around 1998, my office at MIT was also my residence. I was even registered to vote from there. Nowadays I have a separate residence in Cambridge not far from MIT. However, I am rarely there, since I am nearly always travelling out of town.

>>61335191
it only connects to g analytics after you enable the inline script

>>61335182
Of course:
>>61335203

File: Screen Shot 2017-07-12 at 7.23.34 AM.png (1018KB, 3360x2020px) Image search: [Google]

1018KB, 3360x2020px

>>61335192
Or I could just block it and all the other telemetry like telemetry.incoming.mozilla.org at my firewall

>>61335182
No, no, I wanna see how this fucker explains not telling me his address if he's got nothing to hide.
>>61335203
>living at Cambridge and MIT
>doesn't have a bank account
>constantly travelling
>and paying everything in cash
How the fuck do you get your paychecks.

>>61335225
How retarded are you? He is quoting

https://stallman.org/rms-lifestyle.html

>>61334734
>swithcing browser right naw!
to what browser?

>>61335245
Do you really expect me to memorize everything RMS has ever written? Especially after he went full SJW?

>>61334797
which? Opera?

>>61334628

You can block it.

>>61334703
>not using network.IDN_show_punycode:true

>>61335261
>Do you really expect me to memorize everything RMS has ever written?
No. But who the fuck else has lived out of their office at MIT?

>>61334628
NoScript blocks it perfectly fine.

>>61335283
Fair.

>>61335142

That look really interresting could you explain a little bit more ?

i'm retarded i know.

>>61335305
>That look really interresting could you explain a little bit more ?
Cisco Firepower Threat Defense. If you want to play with it, I posted a crack to certcollection. It needs at least 8 CPU cores and 16GB RAM though.

>>61334677

>If you do something you need to hide, maybe you shouldn't do it

I agree. So, when can we expect the live stream from your 24/7 body camera to be up and running?

>>61334703
>Oh, it also refuses to fix a phishing issue for SJW reasons:https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1332714>> We want every script and language to be treated equally on the Internet.

Leftists really are completely mentally ill.
I'm glad I made the right choice and switched to Iridium.

>>61335315

I see 8 CPU cores damn. I have 16 GB RAM but only got an I5 4570.

>>61335346

Even if Firefox is shit, it's still the best browser in terms of privacy.

>>61335350
It needs 2 VMs with 4 cores and 8GB RAM each so technically you could run it. It could have some contention problems though. You can also run it without Firepower Management Console but you lose a lot of functionality.

File: Spectacle.d12746.png (87KB, 896x149px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 896x149px

>>61335346
>The Iridium Browser is based on the Chromium code base.
99% botnet
>All modifications enhance the privacy of the user and make sure that the latest and best secure technologies are used. Automatic transmission of partial queries, keywords, metrics to central services is prevented and only occurs with the approval of the user.
Do you understand that it's almost impossible? Chromium source code is huge and it's quite a mess. I heard that they wrote it in c++ like java coders and used libraries for only one function instead of writing it themselves or something like that.

>>61335315
>It needs at least 8 CPU cores and 16GB RAM though.

>>61334703
>>61335346
>because that would make all non-Latin domain names show as gibberish. That's not really a good thing for people, countries and languages which don't use Latin letters. We want every script and language to be treated equally on the Internet.

Is this the SJW boogeyman you're all so scared of?

File: Untitled.jpg (165KB, 932x386px) Image search: [Google]

165KB, 932x386px

>>61335266
This one.

>>61335388
>99% botnet

It's basically ungoogled chromium but hardened. So no bother. You do realize chromium was an open source project right? Google has no final power over it's direction.

>Chromium source code is huge and it's quite a mess

You could say that about most programs out there. Linux, OPNsense, FF etc., are all in the millions of loc and you need a huge documentation to get around them. I'm all for supple bare bones code but unfortunately I have no power over how others make software. The situation is what it is. Iridium and Brave are best security/privacy wise atm so that's where I'm going. And no, in case you're wondering, Netrunner will never amount to anything, like every other /g/ project.

>>61335393
why don't subhumans that use non-English letters just make their own browser, or their own firefox fork?

>>61335424
...yeah I'll stick with Opera. Chromium64 looks janky as hell, I'll probably use it when I'm looking up tranny porn.

mozilla just doesnt know what to do anymore, it wont take long till it crashes completely
fucking sad...
i blame the sjw crew that got in there

ITT
google shills

>>61335641
Firefox makes all their income through Google.

>>61335653
That explains why it's soooo fucking lame!

Firefox OS - Seriously? They already tried that bucket of flame bait and total failure it was called Internet Explorer!

>>61335489
Respect, you know that Burns there fucking analytics eyeballs having to look in your browser history to see, chick's with dick's!

>>61335471
>You do realize chromium was an open source project right? Google has no final power over it's direction.
The Steam Browser is based on chromium and it pings go.google.com constantly.

>>61335802
Because fucking Steam is so concerned about privacy....

>>61335802
>The Steam Browser is based on chromium and it pings go.google.com constantly.

>if I take an open source software and make a fork with malware in it that makes the original software malware to.

The mods should ban people for posts like these. Not even kidding here, this level of tech illiteracy should not be allowed on /g/.

File: 1499203649728.png (506KB, 2545x1335px) Image search: [Google]

506KB, 2545x1335px

>>61334628

FUCKING NORMIES REEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

File: Screen Shot 2017-07-12 at 8.38.33 AM.png (534KB, 3360x2100px) Image search: [Google]

534KB, 3360x2100px

>>61335802
>go.google.com
dl.google.com

>>61335859
Stop bitching that you're too retarded to monitor what URLs your computer is accessing, and that chromium is botnet.

>this level of tech illiteracy should not be allowed on /g/.
dat projection

>ff thread again

PALE MOON
>try it b4 ad hominem

File: wp_ss_20170712_0001.png (69KB, 800x480px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 800x480px

>>61335928

You have a big mouth for a little slut like you that doesn't even know how open source works.
FYI, Iridium doesn't even let you sign into Google.

https://iridiumbrowser.de/faq.html

>>61335471
>You do realize chromium was an open source project right? Google has no final power over it's direction.

that's like saying that mozilla has no say on firefox because ff is an open source project that takes some queues from the community

chromium is developed by google/google developers, the only differences outside of the name/license/trademark issues is that chromium lacks the auto-updater, lacks google specific telemetry, lacks proprietary flash, lacks proprietary codecs and up until very recently lacked a pdf viewer

>>61335653

stopped being true years ago

>>61335993
>moving the goalposts
stay btfo anon

>>61334677
I think in usa they should ban non fat people.

Only policeman should be able to run and be under 30 BMI. You dont need to run if you have nothing to hide, do you?

>>61334628
Chome is worse – every time I try to visit

chrome://inducebrowsercrashforrealz

it crashes.

File: 1496964400960.jpg (193KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

193KB, 500x500px

>>61336052
>I think in usa they should ban non fat people.
I got news for you, they already have. Pic related.

>>61334628
Oh no, they want to know which addons people install in their browser :(

>>61336017
>that's like saying that mozilla has no say on firefox because ff is an open source project that takes some queues from the community

False analogy, Mozilla has no power over who forks FF.

>>61336050

How old are you? Serious question.

>>61336243
>False analogy, Mozilla has no power over who forks FF.

I misread what you said, that was reply under the assumption you were talking about chromium not iridium, but you're right

>>61336243
In my 30s

File: muhbotnet.png (108KB, 1788x579px) Image search: [Google]

108KB, 1788x579px

>>61336188
>Oh no, they want to know which addons people install in their browser :(

even worse, it's only on the "Get Add-ons" page which embeds a version of https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/ but it only starts to load this if you click away from "Get Add-ons" then click back to it, it doesn't have any analytics the first time you open the addons panel

>>61336337

also something something discovery telemetry, I'm well aware

>>61334677
>nothing to hide nothing to fear meme.
Nice shitpost desu

File: Firefox.full.835466.jpg (1MB, 1200x1149px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1200x1149px

>>61334628
They are getting BTFO on github:

https://github.com/mozilla/addons-frontend/issues/2785


As I mentioned in #1107: we will not be removing analytics support entirely. It is extremely useful to us and we have already weighed the cost/benefit of using tracking.

That said, I think we should only be enabling tracking for users who have opted-in to sharing their data usage in Firefox. I'd guess respecting the Telemetry checkbox would work. Or maybe having a new checkbox if piggy-backing on that one is problematic from a legal perspective.


Go and express your concerns there, I doubt FX devs read /g/

>>61337763
I don't get the obsession with Google Analytics.
As if interfaces improved after the devs got all the usage stats.

>>61336337
Doesn't matter that it's harmless, if you opt-out you should be left alone. I have full telemetry enabled on my moms PC and zero on mine. I want this to be respected. If clueless people who try or use Firefox would still give them data, why piss off /g/entoomen?

>>61337794
the sjws want pretty graphs to play with in between just-sjw-things. that and they are completely out of sane ideas

>>61337763
>I doubt FX devs read /g/
oh buy, you have no idea...

File: 7b2.jpg (12KB, 320x337px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 320x337px

>>61337763
>It is extremely useful to us and we have already weighed the cost/benefit of using tracking.
What a fucking jew, I hope he gets cancer and dies painfully. I'm glad I haven't updated since FF46.

What other browser is there that doesn't pull this shit?

>inb4 chrome/chromium/other botnet-sponsored software
No.

>inb4 vivaldi shill
No.

>using firefags

wew

>>61335993
That argument is fucking stupid considering you can specify a local passphrase that encrypts all the sync content locally before upload.

File: AintTrackinShit.png (114KB, 1303x678px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 1303x678px

Yeah, right, they're tracking me.

NOT

>>61335993

>FYI, Iridium doesn't even let you sign into Google.

THEN WHERE IS MY GOD DAMNED FREEDOM TO DO WHAT I WANT THEN, YOU FUCK?!?!

Fuckin' open source maggots, free software fools, fuck all of you.

>>61334628
And there's still no reasonable alternative to FF

File: 1493790781645.jpg (152KB, 866x441px) Image search: [Google]

152KB, 866x441px

I find it fascinating Firefox has been absolute cancer for the past number of years and still /g/'s asshole is still lubed for more. First, it was a slow piece of shit. Then it went full SJTumblr. Now it's privacy issues blown wide open. Do you guys like taking it up the ass? Serious question.

what's all this shit

>>61343322
see >>61342836
FF became shit but other browsers are still worse

It's only on the "get addons" tab. I think I clicked on it once when I installed firefox. People love being outraged though I guess.