Lisp on the innernette

nobody here has used lisp with http?

You won't get any real programming advice on this board friend

File: seinfeld1.jpg (15KB, 118x128px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 118x128px

>>61327154
you're right, I'm the idiot here for asking /g/

>asking serious programming questions on a chinese basket weaving forum
Wew lad

>>61325944

I use picolisp for a local server, I like it, its ok.

why not hunchentoot? I honestly have no idea which is most performant, im still trying to learn lisp itself.

also take these
http://vito.sdf.org/lispweb3.html
http://adamtornhill.com/articles/lispweb.htm
https://leanpub.com/lispwebtales

>>61328951
>hunchentoot
thanks for this, Woo looks nice but hunchentoot looks like a more mature project

File: racket.png (4KB, 225x225px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 225x225px

>>61325944
Common Lisp is for oldfarts, you should move to Racket:
http://docs.racket-lang.org/web-server-internal/index.html

>>61329010
>meme scheme with its own nonstandard extensions
>over standard common lisp
wew

>>61329010
racket is slow

>>61328951
>use scroller on leanpub link
Pay author 10$!
Author gets 7$!
Cause gets 0$!
>change cause to 10$
AUTHOR GETS 111$!!!
etc

>>61329010
Racket is a very nice language I have no problem with it. I'm using Lisp because side from being a great language as is, SBCL is an amazing implementation. I could be mistaken but I'm pretty sure SBCL out-performs Racket in most operations.

>>61329041
Yet, it's faster than most scripting languages. Also, there is a new official branch of Racket being develop right now that uses Chez Scheme, and this will make Racket faster than SBCL in one or two years.

Seriously, learn typed racket now.

>>61329400
it's not an issue of speed, it's an issue of ecosystem for me. CL has a plethora of libraries with industry application. Scheme is a very nice variant of Lisp with genuine academic appeal if you want my shitty opinion.