Nightly has become fast as fuck and honestly, the change to WebExt

>>61318205
>Latest build enables you to seperate to let them run in a seperate process.
*enables you to let them run in a seperate process

sorry..

>>61318205
>>61318213
how does this thing work, will it be in the next beta build or is it reserved to nightly

>>61318234
seperate processes for webextension addons are reserved to nightly but seperate processes for tabs have already been implemented. Though, some old addons do not support multiprocess which means you should replace them by new alternatives and enable browser.tabs.remote.force-enable;false.

In case you don't know how it works:
1. Type "about:config" in your address bar
2. Search for "browser.tabs.remote.autostart" and set to true
3. same for the rest

>>61318258
yeah I know I've been using it since like v48
thanks for the heads-up though

Download the latest Nightly, even faster now

File: ss-2017-07-11-15-08-21.png (20KB, 1679x67px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 1679x67px

WHY IS THE FONT SO TINY

>>61319139
>being an eyelet
Y live

>guise it's fast now i swear
>meanwhile chromium runs circles around it on a fucking pentium 4

can't even play a fucking webm without choking

There's actually a lot more in the works for 57. Stylo hasn't even been enabled yet.

File: mumbaiheat.png (46KB, 406x351px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 406x351px

>>61319189
the test machine

File: ss-2017-07-11-15-16-52.png (112KB, 1610x487px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 1610x487px

WHOA CHROME BTFO

File: ss-2017-07-11-15-19-13.png (37KB, 609x642px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 609x642px

>>61319250
Gah ;)

>>61319272
that's most probably an addon causing the crash

>>61319297
or servo which I enabled. it happened after opening devtools

>>61318205
I can't go back to Firefox unless their Web Extensions support the Google Input Tools

It's the only sane way to input Cantonese Chinese on any operating system

>>61318205
does it work on linux too?

>>61319408
Yep, flawlessly.

>>61319272
>>61319297
>>61319362
yep. it doesn't crash with

layout.css.servo.enabled

set to false (which is the default)

>>61318205
Honestly I've been using Nightly if Chrome doesn't act up.

>>61319250
>Firefox having higher render score than Chromium
I don't believe it. Firefox is notorious for having slow ass graphics stack compared to both Chromium and IE.

why did they have to use rust

File: firefox_2017-07-11_09-36-47.png (82KB, 1920x504px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 1920x504px

>>61319250
can confirm... whoah...

>>61318205
Can I have Nightly and the stable release at the same time? I'd like to test it and fuck around but having my actual setup untouched.

>>61319589
sure

Ok, Nightly experts, how do I disable the god damned fucking scrollbar that swipes up from the bottom of the browser every fucking time I start this piece of shit?

Mozilla, what the fuck are you people doing?

>>61319589
Make a new profile and run Nightly there. You're supposed to do that in the first place because Nightly can modify/corrupt profiles and render them unusable in stable.

>>61318205
>SWJFox

Not even once.

>>61319659
>>>/pol/

Any gentooman know of a decent overlay with a live 9999 build?

>>61319663
>>>/lgbt/

>>61319659
>caring about the political beliefs of people who make a piece of software
>not caring about the actual quality of the software

>>>/pol/

Why use this over icecat

>get latest Nightly
>get Chrome 59
>run Octane 2.0 on both
>Chrome still stomps Firefox in that one

>>61319696
nice assumption but I'm a hetero and I dislike SJWs

File: 0124 - 9W1otGc.png (128KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 1024x1024px

>>61319760
but is the botnet worth it?

>>61319760
https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2017/04/google-deprecates-octane-javascript-benchmark-because-everyone-is-basically-cheating/
deprecated

>>61319641
Done. Already posting from it. Let's see how it goes.

>>61319715
In that case, I would pick Edge, it is 20x better than SJWFox.

>>61319770
>Says he is hetero
>Defends and encourages the use if SJWFox

Go play with your dildos, goy.

>>61319857
>preferring an actual botnet browser to one made by people with questionable political options

your priorities are messed up man.

>>61319881
what browser do you use? you know Google are also full of SJWs right?

File: 1499324383206.jpg (10KB, 200x210px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 200x210px

>>61319881

Not him, but you're a fucking ugly geek if you really care about the politics behind a fucking browser you dweeb, it works, and it isn't a botnet, at least to chromes level. I bet you're a real fun guy in real life.

>>61319887
You said politics dont count faggot, if politics count SJWFox is BTFO.

>>61319929
Politics don't count, only being a part of the botnet matters. Of course it's hard to expect a /pol/tard to know how to read.

>>61319918
Of course I care, and I told all the people I know to stop using SJWFox and what they did to Brendan, all agreed with me, no more SJWFox among my relatived and friends.

>>61319659
Still the least evil browser my chrome shill friend.

>>61319948
I'm more confident using a botnet than using a browser full of unstable and intolerant people.

>>61319659
>>61319881
Mozilla is apolitical, they don't exclude anyone. You not liking some of the people they include does not mean that they're taking their side.

>>61319881
i guess you use edge or opera since jewgle is full of them
>giving a shit about devs political views

>>61319970
>The doxed their own CEO
>Not evil

Sure thing goy.

>>61319987
>Apollitical
>Fires its CEO for his political views.

Eww lad.

>>61318205
>the change to WebExt made a huge difference in performance.
it also killed the reason why firefox was firefox
have fun going down

>>61319997
Still not as evil as google who tried to rig the entire election chrome shill.

>>61319992
>Not giving a shit about SJWZilla doxing its own CEO.

Can't do much for you there.

>>61320010
He stepped down. The Mozilla board is the one that put him there in the first place and they publicly stated they would not have him step down. If they wanted him to step down they would have publicly done so.

>>61320015
Evil is evil lad.

All my addons are legacy tho

>>61320034
I know you can't read, but least evil means I'm admitting they're evil they're just the least evil option available.

>>61320032
>He stepped down

Sure thing lad, he "stepped down"

>>61320055
Is your personal opinion, firing its own CEO for its pollitical views is a lot evil in my book.

>>61320032
(((stepped down)))

>>61320048
Some addons aren't completely legacy. Hybrid addons get marked as legacy when they're really partly of almost fully compatible with webextensions APIs. Addon devs are using hybrid addons to transfer settings and configuration over to webextensions and to gradually port older code over to the new APIs

>>61320067
He stepped down.

>>61320067
And in my personal opinion, pulling a ministry of truth to give hillary more positive results compared to other search engines is far more evil. Mozilla has nowhere the level of power google has, they can rewrite history if they wanted to.

>>61319881
a piece of software that retrieves and renders webpages is apolitical unless it blocks arbitrary content which it doesn't
fuck off to /pol/ or better yet seek psychological treatment you brainwashed ideologue

Wait for servo

>>61320090
I don't use Chrome. So, I dont give a fuck.

>>61318205
how big is the difference? last time i used like 2-3 months ago it was the worst shit in existence

>>61320094
Not caring about the agenda of the company behind is browser

You need to work for a better world, anon.

>>61320127
It's noticeably faster than stable. I don't know what kind of hardware you have but you might want to consider refreshing your profile

>>61319189
Chromium has the shittiest interface ever designed

Firefox/Nightly gets slow as fuck if I leave it open overnight

>>61320115
Excellent, those untruths and unpersons will be corrected by the our big brother google. Remember, we were always at war with oceania and hillary never committed war crimes.

>>61319435
webkit based browsers has css issues that's been put aside for the past decade

like this for example:

https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17205

>>61320133
as far as I can see their agenda is to maintain a viable alternative to google chrome and a platform to share knowledge about web technologies

>>61318205
I am a Nightly user and I am fucking annoyed by Mozillas shit. Just today I got an update that makes the new tab page look exactly like chromes and wastes so much fucking space.

Also forcing WebExtensions in its current state is such a bad decision, it is buggy and lacks tons of features.

Everytime I use Chrome it is noticeable that it is 1000% faster. I just don't use it because of muh botnet and because I host my own firefox sync server and Firefox for Android which has proper plugin support (uBlock etc).

Also Google shouldn't have a monopoly on browsers.

/blog

>>61320223
>Also forcing WebExtensions in its current state is such a bad decision, it is buggy and lacks tons of features.
look at the calendar. it's july and the webextensions update is scheduled for november

>>61320255
For stable, but nightly update in august it's mandatory.

>>61320255
Still a bad decision imo because there is no way that it will even have 10% of the features the old API has by then.
And customization was always one of Firefox' strong points...

>>61319139
Works on Linux!

>>61319189
>>61319239
Nothing is usable on a potato PC.

>>61319272
You'll never see this screen unless you bloat ff with a shit ton of useless addons which would crash it. I haven't seen a single crash in the last 3 years of using firefox and 6 months of using nightly.

>>61319408
Yes. They don't provide installers. They instead give you an archive which you unpack into a folder with firefox installed. Then you'll have to make a custom laucher for the run file (for convenience). This is easy if you use XFCE or KDE. I haven't tried on GNOME but Unity was shit and couldn't into custom launchers/shortcuts which is why I moved from vanilla Ubuntu.

>>61319659
Fuck off, /pol/tard

>>61319760
>Octane
The benchmark is pretty shit. Even Google said they no longer see it as a valid benchmarking tool.

>>61320014
No it didn't.

>>61320048
Addons usually follow stable or beta builds. All important/useful ones will be supported soon™.

>>61320127
Pretty big, honestly.

>>61320163
Works on my machine™! I'm currently keeping it open for 3 days and it still uses less than 2GB RAM on 20 tabs and hasn't slowed down at all.

>>61320223
>Chrome is 1000% faster
Doubt it, shill.

>>61320292
and do you know why do we have distinction between "stable builds" and "nightly builds" in the first place?

How do I get a sane scrollbar? Nothing in about:config

>>61320173
Chrome being shitty is not excuse to use SJWFox

>>61320312
I can understand that, but in my view cutting legacy bloat to improve maintainability and performance is worth the cost of breaking workflow of 1% of users.

>>61320207
You are to uninformed lad, their agenda is to promote SJW anti-values.

>>61320317
>Fuck off, /pol/tard
Same site, alt-lite.

>>61320032
>stepped down
Yeah, why don't you step down off your chair after putting a noose around your neck, see how it feels ;)

>>61320317
>Fuck off

Not an argument

How do I get the dolphin filepicker working on firefox? so far only had luck with chromium

>>61320317
>Doubt it, shill.
I'm a firefox user and not a shill and I don't know/care about benchmark performance, but the perceived performance with JS heavy websites (e.g. Maps) is much better in Chromium. I still won't use it because of the reasons stated in the other post.

>>61320361
Have fun in your Google botnet

>>61320364
Yes I know but just as an example:
There is currently no way to get video hardware decoding in Firefox on Linux without using some obscure addons that will stop working / already stopped working in Nightly.

>>61320361
You have to be a google shill, nobody can be okay with this level of thought control. The way they use google search and YouTube to try to manipulate public opinion is disgusting. They're even starting to do fact checking where google gets to decide what's fact now. What mozilla did to their CEO wasn't cool, but it pales in comparison to what google is capable of.

>>61320393
You know you have a containment board for a reason

>>61320431
>Implying that I use chrome.

>>61320431
>Google's sites are slow on browsers not made by Google
Who would have guessed. There have been incidents where Google loaded sites faster for firefox if it spoofed the useragent to chrome, but this was later "fixed".

>>61320436
I don't use Google products anon.

>>61320448
>>61320480
I severely doubt it since you brush off google like it's no big deal.

>>61320448
What do you use then?

>>61320470
I guess Google """"optimizing"""" their sites for their own browser also plays a role, but the increased performance is also noticeable on other sites (for me, on Linux, YMMV).

It's only been getting better in performance which really doesn't matter when your whole appeal is customization and extensability, but they're trading that for perf. Mozilla themselves have turned into the devil while having a SUN like budget plan (bleed money as fast as you can on nothing important).

This shit is so backwards, why does every browser have to be barebones and stock only now? Why even cater to the people who don't care, are they going to see a benefit from all these performance enhancements with their 2 tabs. What's up with all the rust integration too, are they planning on dropping support for non x86 platforms? The state of web browsers right now is abyssal, Firefox is the best choice and I obviously hate what it's become, so what does that show. Good thing I can just move to Opera, oh wait.

>>61320383
well, then they're doing pretty shit job of iy because I don't see any "SJW anti-values" in any of their flagship products. or you're just a brainwashed ideologue who blows things out of proportions

>>61320494
Not as big as SJWZilla.

I'm glad these threads will be gone once Firefox 57 becomes Chrome.

>>61320548
Any open source browser that is not related to Google nor SJWZilla.

>>61320645
I'm not a rust expert, but they say it also runs on other platforms?
https://forge.rust-lang.org/platform-support.html

Personally I like that they swap out some old code with more modern and robust code.

>>61320724
You need to lurk more anon, start wuth the part they donated money to replace the words "master" and "slave"

>>61320745
Doesn't answer my question.

>>61320749
Man that page looks like bullshit with their checkmarks, last I heard nothing in tier2 passes tests, what's the point of showing that the compiler built when it either doesn't generate working code or the runtime is faulty, or both.

>>61320769
Google: "Open source browsers not related to SJWZILLA and Google", I cant do averything for you, anon.

>>61320792
I asked what browser *you* specifically use. I doubt Google can find that.

also
>SJWzilla
nice meme

>>61320761
>they spent 0.0000375 of their annual revenue to change words in documentations
oh gee, they really are pushing sjw with full power. at last I can see. I'm truly ""red pilled"" now. brb installing netrunner

File: google.jpg (193KB, 1287x1072px) Image search: [Google]

193KB, 1287x1072px

>>61319659

>>61319392
>bothering to use chinese

>>61320985
>being a mandarinlet

>>61320840
https://www.google.com.mx/amp/s/itsfoss.com/open-source-browsers-linux/amp/

It is literally the first ocurrence.

SJWZilla is not a meme, the do push the SJW agenda

>>61320849
>Sarcasm is not an argument
>Cant arge with a SJWZombie

Is time to end the duscussion with you anon.

>>61321027
Do you not speak English or are you actually retarded? Maybe read the question again.
A list with 7 browsers is not an answer.

And if you are so anti Google and anti """SJWzilla""" why the fuck do you link me to an AMP search result?
That is literally the cancer of the internet.

>>61321089
>You ask for one alternative
>I gave you seven

Some people are never happy, no matter what.

>>61321125
Just for reference, the question I asked:
>What do you use then?
>I asked what browser *you* specifically use. I doubt Google can find that.

How hard is that to understand?

>>61321054
>a person not possed by my ideology must be possesed by the other ideology I fight against
pretty sad to see first-hand that people unironically think like this

>>61321172
*possessed

>>61321165
Straigh answer, any of those.

>>61321172
Kinda like that, but in a good way.

>>61321165
He probably uses Google Chrome.

>>61321233
>Implying

>>61318205
Is it as fast as Chromium? I tried Nightly a few months ago and it was as slow as the regular Firefox build. I continue to use Firefox though...

>>61321258
then why don't you stop making these vague answers and just fucking tell which browser you are using right now?

>>61321277
I gave you an answer, if you don't it, is your problem.

>>61321324
Alright, so you use 7 browsers at the same time.
Congratulations, you are even more retarded than Chrome users.

anyone got the link to that about:config optimization/security github page?

shit was cache ;)

File: google.gay.rights.jpg (32KB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 640x360px

>all these kids crying about muh sjwfox
as if thats a argument when the alternitive is google the sjw cucklord

>>61321459
Implying I use Chrome

I wonder when Amazon will release a web browser?

>>61321528
Chromium is just as bad fag

>>61321680
6 years ago

>>61321720
Implying I use Chromium

File: google.2017.coexist.png (304KB, 1085x629px) Image search: [Google]

304KB, 1085x629px

>>61321863
take a screenshot of ur browser then faggot

>inb4 its chromecuck of sjws

File: Lynx-wikipedia.png (16KB, 1100x799px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 1100x799px

>>61322065
One of my
choices.

>>61318205
Get a decent haircut Mitchell Baker and fuck off.
Will the shilling ever end?
Just let it DIE.

>>61318205
kek, it's faster than Chrome
finally

>>61322196
You don't use Lynx browser anon.
C'mon , Don't need to look all hip and techy infront of us /g/uys

>>61322349
>You don't use Lynx
>Implying

File: keklynxscreenie.png (38KB, 1593x870px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 1593x870px

>>61322412
>anon asks to take a screenshot of his browser
>produces something from the lynx browser wikipedia

A For effort anon

>>61322471
Cant take screenshot, I'm out using my phone.

I'm liking a lot this version. Will actual stable release be like this? Could I keep this nightly forever?

>>61322509
What browser for phone then?

>>61322660
Opera

>>61319659
>>>/pol/
Which is basically
>>>/r/the_donald/

>WebExt
What's the point in using firefox without XUL addons? Might as well switch to Chromium

>>61322509
Fucking phonefags

>>61322722

Go to
>>>lgtb please

>>61322784
nice linking newfag

>>61322722
Not an argument

>>61319659
Spot the only Pale Moon user on the planet

>>61318258
>Search for "browser.tabs.remote.autostart" and set to true
I have this option in Firefox Beta too

>>61318205
waiting on servo

>needing a seperate browser for browing just at nightime

lel you mozilla mongrels never cease to fail

I don't really care on the political opinions of developers. As long as they create good software I don't care about political firings and stuff like that. Unless of course their political ideaology starts to fuck with me. Then I start to care.

funny it still doesn't feel as snappy as Opera.
till the next update

File: 1365134608228.jpg (100KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 1280x720px

>>61318205
Alright you fucking faggots, I fell for the Nightly meme. It's actually fast this time, almost as fast as Chromium. It's just a little bit slower, almost not noticeable and on some websites it's actually faster than Chromium. Nightly also comes with codecs so videos on normie websites work. I'm impressed.
Posted from Chromium because I'm watching a stream on Nightly which was previously impossible to do on stable Firefox and won't play on Chromium because it doesn't have stupid codecs.

>>61320645
I think I remember seeing some Mozilla docs showing that they wanted to get rid of customization to preserve "brand identity" and keep retards from being confused about themes or skins in screenshots being different browsers.

all I care about is if my privacy add-ons like Adblock, no script and privacy Badger will still work and if it will break VimFX.
>>61327900
Is this why Firefox can't use my native gtk theme? It pisses me off that Firefox has to look different from the rest of my programs. I try to set up a vaporwave rice and Firefox ruins it with a modern Chrome rip off look.

>>61320645
Mozilla's appeal is backing free open source software and resisting stagnation on the web. XUL addons are FOSS but they're not portable and no one wants to embed Gecko in their application so XUL addons being FOSS is damn near useless. Gecko is damn near useless as-is because it's huge and has outstanding bugs that no one can address because XUL addons get in the way. Both XUL addons and Gecko are causing Mozilla to become stagnant.

This is not sustainable there's other solution here except cutting XUL addons loose and FINALLY fixing the problems with Gecko that have been set aside all this time.

File: 1499711266799.png (1MB, 1165x659px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1165x659px

>>61319659
>>61319881
But SJW hate Israel...

Are nightly builds more secure than stable builds?

>>61328312
It might have stricter sandboxing levels but otherwise no.

>>61319392
I realize its not remotely the same thing, but couldn't you use Bopomofo as an input method? Or would that not work for Cantonese?

To Be Honestly

Moz:\\a finally getting on board with the multithreading might be its saving grace

I use Pale Meme right now, but I hate it when Facebook's Pajeet-Tier JS abomination gets stuck AND THE WHOLE BROWSER LOCKS UP BECAUSE IT'S FUCKING SINGLETHREADED. EVEN MICROSOFT EDGE LETS YOU BROWSE TABS WHEN ONE ISN'T RESPONDING FFS

but I tried Firefox fifty-something recently and it looks like it might actually be worth it to use

Cannot fucking stand that they got rid of toolbars. Roboform is fucking useless now and I have to find a different password manager.

>sjw hurr durr
make a better browser, /pol/

Oh, sorry, I forgot you faggots can only shitpost from moms basement.
Maybe if you take those poojeet java courses, one day you, too, can write a computer program :^)

Is there an alternative to No Enumerable Extensions that works with Nightly?

File: untitled.png (139KB, 1360x768px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 1360x768px

>>61320317
>Nothing is usable on a potato PC.
Apologize.

>>61319987
WEW LAD

>Alsa is fucked
>Adwaita Dark theme is fucked
>font rendering is fucked
>download manager is fucked
I really tried senpaitachi, I really did...

Any reason why I'm getting a little bit of lag(like loading or opening some tabs)?

fuck you mozilla
give me my addons you faggots

File: 1496897996431.gif (2MB, 420x262px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 420x262px

>>61319659
look at all these triggered fucking faggots excellent bait post my friend

File: 1497812989236.jpg (27KB, 615x456px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 615x456px

>>61331752
>Oh, sorry, I forgot you faggots can only shitpost from moms basement.
>Maybe if you take those poojeet java courses, one day you, too, can write a computer program :^)

how far behind is Developer Edition from nightly?

File: ss-2017-07-12-14-40-14.png (17KB, 838x188px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 838x188px

>>61320317
>Works on Linux!
I am on linux you dumbass

>>61320328
Are you seriously asking why we have test builds of software before it's made stable?

>>61335410
no, the anon I was responding to doesn't seem to know that because he bitched about an unfinished feature being "forced" in nightly

>>61335138
Developer edition is going away. But it is one version behind nightly, and beta is one version behind dev edition.

>>61335477
Ah ok.

>>61319625
Follow the tutorial that comes within the bar popup

Can I use Nightly with my Chromecast?

>>61335138
1 version so ~6-8 weeks.

But will my firefox stylish theme work tho?

>>61335479
>Developer edition is going away.
Aurora is going away. Developer Edition will be based on Beta going forward. Developer edition is still 1 version behind Nightly, Beta has been moved one version up. Nothing else changed.

>>61338348
Put it in a file called userChrome.css and place it in your profile folder and it should continue to work even without stylish

When will Firefox support kdialog on KDE and have option for tabs in titlebar on Linux?

>>61338602
never, kde a shit

>>61332956
The other guy had 1GB RAM.

>>61335370
Works on my machine :^)

>>61338812
I am on your machine you dumbass. you're ip is 127.0.0.1

>>61338879
How the fuck do you know that??? Wtf.