ZFS root

how is this gonna actually improve your computer usage in any tangible way dude, you're just bored.

File: a014d0492e54d9ac60530400487b6ba730235a63253341c8e987d565b776920d.jpg (61KB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 640x360px

>>61299182
I will never again experience data loss.

>>61299198
It's just your root partition. All the data you actually care about is on your /home, so it really doesn't matter.

In all seriousness, OP, why not btrfs? Are you seriously trusting ZFS ported to GNU/Linux over a (somewhat) comparable filesystem native to GNU/Linux?

>using ZFS

enjoy your shitty, unrecoverable performance losses once you exceed like 70% disk usage.

>>61299529
>btrfs
I'm not op and I actually use xfs but seriously btrfs is a fucking trainwreck and has had so many bugs and data loss problrms.

>>61299529
I want this server to last.
Never need to touch it to run X or Y ever again after just doing it once.
ZFS is entirely designed for low maintenance, no write hole, used it for about a year previous and dicked around on a few BTRFS laptops. I don't trust it with my main stuff.

It's clear who the winner is and having the entire system config backed this strongly has been my main goal.

zfs on linux for years in prod, pretty great, snapshots were a game changer

>>61299166
why are translations for this so slow? i need more kengan.