I need a cpu with 512 cores minimum. When will it happen?

2028

t. time traveler

>>61291186
http://www.adapteva.com/announcements/epiphany-v-a-1024-core-64-bit-risc-processor/

just use a gpu instead dumbass. they calculate faster.

you can't see more than 4 Cores anyway

>>61291251
>only 2 TFLOPS per GHz
for what purpose?

>>61291186
When 128bit CPU's become a thing.

File: Galactic-Ascension.jpg (108KB, 727x718px) Image search: [Google]

108KB, 727x718px

>>61291896
My filesystem is already 128 bit tho.

you can have a GPU with 4096 cores, its more or less the same
https://www.techpowerup.com/gpudb/2947/radeon-rx-550

>>61291259
But GPUGPU isn't very practical yet, since OS's don't like them and the easiest way to do GPGPU is with OpenCL and that's all AMD so good luck.

>>61293136
GPGPU* my bad

>>61292489
>a GPU with 4096 cores
no such thing exists

>>61293136
Isn't Nvidia working on some shit like that?

>>61291186
>implying human eyes can see past 8 cores

Why even bother?

>>61294253
/thread

>>61291371
>t. intel

>>61294218
Nvidia is working on CUDA.