Ryzen is No.2 most popular CPUs at Amazon now

See I told you to just wait, we're actually winning.

File: AM4 mobo chipsets chart.jpg (38KB, 620x257px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 620x257px

>>61275344
Excellent

>>61275357

And how many years did that take?

Jesting aside, it's great to see some good competition again. I'd like to consider a Ryzen 5 cpu sometime myself.

File: amadaexciteULTRA.png (210KB, 422x537px) Image search: [Google]

210KB, 422x537px

>>61275344

>>61275519
I'm excited about ryzen not because ill buy one, but because it'll force intel to make something good just in time for when I'm considering upgrading from a 4790k in a couple years

>>61275344
How's ignoring number one going?
PS AMD market share is still garbage.
Enjoy your "win"

File: 1499463213542.jpg (55KB, 297x365px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 297x365px

>>61275344

>>61276134
D A M A G E C O N T R O L

File: 1492855909643.png (944KB, 1228x1502px) Image search: [Google]

944KB, 1228x1502px

>>61275344
I HATE AMD SO FUCKING MUCH

>>61275932
Intel will never drop prices, cannonlake is mobile shit, 10nm will be slower than 14nm and basically you'll have to wait till 2021. And we're not even sure the new arch will even be good.

>>61275344
I'm gonna get an AMD CPU in the future, probably in 6-8 years or so. I don't see the point of upgrading from a 2013-2015 CPU other than getting a more power efficient one.

>>61276252
I was planning to hold out until 2021 if possible anyways, since I want to wait until HDMI 2.1 and DDR5 memory which should be standard then

>>61276259
Would you risk waiting till 2021 for Itanium 2.0?

>there are more poor people than rich people
wooooooooooow

second place is winning in delusional AYYYMDDDtard world

Who even buys from Amazon? Microcenter is the place to get your parts and i7s at a discount.

>>61276845
>Only two processor models are on sale today
LMAO nice damage control faggot :^)

>>61276875
because everyone has a microcenter within driving distance

>>61276781
You can always buy AMD if Intel's new uarch is Itanic 2.0: moar vectors boogaloo.

File: Screenshot_20170708-145542.png (517KB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

517KB, 1440x2560px

For the price of a Ryzen 5 1600, you can get a dual xeon x5650 Dell R710 system with 24GB of RAM.

You can have twice the threads and a full server system with drive bays and two PSUs for just the price of this processor.

"winning" my ass. I would like to see AMD win, but it's not happening with this particular processor.

>>61277203
This is some quality shitposting.

>>61277203
>LGA1366
try again

>>61276157
You're funny.

>>61277203
I had a dual 6-core Xeon system last year, but I got rid of it since it was too power hungry and the single-thread performance was lacking at best.

>>61275344
Heh, them stupid right wing nutjobs, giving a vicious savage a lethal injection is the same thing as killing fetuses! drumpf btfo!

>>61277231
>>61277234
>>61277307
>ryzen only has a 30watt TDP advantage and a meager 24% single core advantage over a 7 year old server processor

Guys, come on now.

File: 0bd.jpg (55KB, 440x522px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 440x522px

OYYYYYYYY VEY

>>61277382
That's x86 for you.

>>61277203
>Xeon
Nice server chip.

>look at list
>Skylake Pentium instead if Kaby Lake
>Celerons
Who the fuck buys those? I doubt HP and dell buy garbage bin CPU's from Amazon, but I can't imagine a system builder buying these either.

>>61275344
>AMDrones buying parts from website that charges tax

LOL

>>61277473
Pentium is still the best option for sub-$500 computers.

>>61277630
KL Pentiums have hyberthreading, while Skylake ones don't. It would be silly to buy old Penyiums new as they're completely obsolete, although maybe some people are unaware and think both are the same. I guess miners would explain the Celeries, since you don't need a good CPU, just a good motherboard.

>>61277382
>What is binning

>>61277419
>>61277407
>>61277899

Again, I want to see AMD win. I'm excited about their server chips and HEDT shit. But the Ryzen 5 1600 is a bad deal unless you have extraordinarily high electricity costs. Buying a couple old xeons gives you twice as many threads with a very small single core performance hit. It's way cheaper and has better results.

>>61277966
And what's the scaling like on that? Because it's definitely not going to be 1:1.

can Ryzen do GPU passthrough?

>>61277473
Celerons for mining rigs probably

>>61277419
There is a lot of arguments you could make against his statement. This is not one of them.

>>61278010
What do you mean? I don't understand the question.

>>61277675
Skylake Pentiums can be overclocked, KL can't.

>>61278214
It means if the 12-core 24-thread monster you have actually works as intended in multithreaded applications by a factor of 24 like Ryzen does by a factor of 12 since it scales almost perfectly. The answer btw is probably not for your dual Xeons

>>61277966
Buying anything earlier than Sandy Bridge in 2017 is completely pointless. Also DDR4 has a noticeable improvement over DDR3 in gaymes.

>>61278218
You need a Z170 board with an original BIOS, and even then it's only base clock overclocking and it disables all power saving features. You have to factor in buying a better PSU and cooler as well. And even then you're stuck with a 2C2T CPU that can't run any modern games. I never saw what all the hype was about, Pentium Anniversary Edition was already dead when Skylake overlclocking was discovered. I'd only recommend it for fun. not for a main desktop.

>>61278322
>Also DDR4 has noticeable improvement over DDR3 in gaymes.
not him but is that true? any benchmarks showing this difference?

>>61278519
>better psu
no. it's not like it's 500W x299