Which init should replace systemd, and why?
Sound off!
Systemd fags please GTFO.
none, systemd is just perfect
>>61232771
meh
I don't have much experience with OpenRC but runit is fast. Like booting in 30 seconds on a 5400rpm HDD with almost no cache fast.
>>61232771
t. Pöttering
There's a reason why OpenRC is the default init system of Gentoo.
>and it's not because it's shit
>>61232840
Yes it is called "autism"
>>61232771
fuck off poettering
>>61232845
I like the idea behind Gentoo and the Unix philosophy, but I'm too lazy to migrate. So, only a person with autism could be dedicated enough to actually do it.
sysv + openrc
systemd is superior
>>61232859
openrc in its description literally states that its interoperable between any distro
the gentoo team wants it to be shared because they are cool :]
>>61232892
Yeah I looked at systemd-free.org. Still not autistic enough to care though.
>>61232859
>>61232929
"First they came for the Communists . . . "
>>61232747
Systemd already pretty much replaced them both, Mr. Backwardsman.
>>61233374
First they came for the socialists.
>>61232840
Is it the same reason gentoo uses gcc 3.7?
>>61232747
OpenRC and runit are not the only one, Source Mage actually uses a third one which is not SysVinit but also based on scripts.
>>61232771
>>61233757
Fuck off poettering
>>61233881
> locked conversation
My fucking sides... what an insufferable faggot.
>>61233826
Gentoo uses whatever gcc you decide to update to, but it ships with a much older one because the latest autobuild was compiled last year
>fast, stable, and works on most, if not all, computers
>REEEEEEEEEEEEEEE MUH OBFUSCATION MUH OPEN SORES REEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>w-w-w-why aren't normies using Linux guys? Linux desktop never ;_;
>>61233881
a new openRC user is born....
>>61233881
christ what an absolutely massive faggot
>>61233881
To be honest, Poettering has probably closed this issue only because there was a bunch of people about to start a flame war.
This bug has been fixed since
>>61234380
Test on your own system.
Please report results.
runit is pretty good
>>61233787
Please see:
http://www.history.ucsb.edu/faculty/marcuse/niem.htm
>>61232747
Runit is as simple and straightforward as you can get.
>>61234495
Bu-but the narration!
ksh
.kshrc contents:
your shit
&
Isn't SysVinit abandoned now?
>>61234698
Interesting. I though the "carved in stone" version was the correct version.
>But the author himself used several versions.
Comes down to original vs popular, I guess.
runit is better. Try Void Linux to see a working implementation.
>>61235591
He actually said:
"First they came for the init . . . "
>>61235402
No that's just what the systemd shills say.