The perfect web browser doesn't exsi...

t.

>>61222925
HAHA I get is so edgy

give me a few reasons besides "muh sjws" why i should use this over regular firefox

>>61223000

It has a better icon.

>>61223000
Keeping XUL addons

File: Firefox nightly.png (33KB, 800x498px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 800x498px

thats not correct faggot, also waterfox gave me a pitiful 53.4

File: serveimage.png (1018KB, 2485x2340px) Image search: [Google]

1018KB, 2485x2340px

>>61223041
Firefox nightly has a better one.

>>61223102
i can easily re-enable them by setting extensions.allow-non-mpc-extensions to true in about:config

>>61223102
>wanting shitty abandonware
Currently all good and important addons work on legacy mode.

>>61222901
Firefox was the perfect browser around 2006-2008, I remember spending days searching and installing for my favorite 60 addons at the time, I used to open 100+ in 5 or 6 tab lines on a 512MB PC

>>61223134
Beautiful.

>>61223000
Pocket is removed

>>61222901
Is this bait? This better be bait

File: firefox-256.e2c1fc556816.jpg (19KB, 256x256px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 256x256px

>>61222901
what extensions? other than Ublock and HttpsEverywhere

File: ss+(2017-07-05+at+01.45.10).jpg (12KB, 227x118px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 227x118px

>>61223449
You tell me.

>>61223449
vimperator/pentadactyl

>>61223134
What's with the downie globe? What earth is that supposed to represent?

>>61223131
Firefox 381.66 397.06 387.28 - Avg: 388.66
Waterfox 407.91 423.26 370.56 - Avg: 400.79

Ran three passes in Basemark Web 3.0, seems marginal but Waterfox beats out Firefox in general. Firefox is x86 though, so I don't know how much that plays into it.

Epic browser. Hands down .

>>61223494
my FF nightly is x64 though so thats why its faster, plus i enabled e10s, but I refuse to use a 32-bit browser at all

>>61222901
I've been looking for a new browser and this addresses all my issues with Firefox. Thank you.

>>61222901
>doesn't exsi...

As much as I love Waterfox, cut this garbage out.

>>61223511
Jetstream:
Waterfox x64 (Speedometer:44.9 ± 1.0)
193.45 ± 0.80650
Latency - 99.136 ± 0.87387
Throughput - 324.27 ± 1.6893
Geometric - 193.45 ± 0.80650

Firefox x86 (Speedometer: 49.0 ± 1.5)
201.14 ± 4.0654
Latency - 100.78 ± 1.9342
Throughput - 343.09 ± 7.2086
Geometry - 201.14 ± 4.0654

I haven't played with Nightly at all but apparently it's bretty good all things considered.

>>61223725
FF nightly gave me 82 on speedometer, and most x64 forks (pale moon, waterfox) gave me way lower scores of 40's to 60's

>>61223404
"browser.pocket.enabled" to False in about:config.

>>61223449
Self Destructing Cookies

>>61222925
>exsit

File: hogananananan_carat_ayy.jpg (35KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 500x500px

>>61223340
>not netscape in the 90s

>no AppImage

dropped

>>61223493

The one not being lit by the sun?

>>61223505
Piss off, pajeet.

>>61222901
>le ebin reddit me--

kill yourself back to /r/waterfox

>>61222901
Well if it does exist it certainly isn't a derivative of Firefox, that's for sure.

>>61223494
Firefox has been x64 for years retard

>>61223725

Why are you comparing Waterfox x64 to Firefox x86? You should compare it to Firefox x64.